Correlation Between Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ashmore Emerging Markets and Calvert Floating Rate Advantage, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ashmore Emerging with a short position of Calvert Floating-rate. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate.
Diversification Opportunities for Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate
0.87 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Ashmore and Calvert is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ashmore Emerging Markets and Calvert Floating Rate Advantag in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Calvert Floating Rate and Ashmore Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ashmore Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Calvert Floating-rate. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Calvert Floating Rate has no effect on the direction of Ashmore Emerging i.e., Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate
Assuming the 90 days horizon Ashmore Emerging Markets is expected to generate 1.55 times more return on investment than Calvert Floating-rate. However, Ashmore Emerging is 1.55 times more volatile than Calvert Floating Rate Advantage. It trades about 0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Calvert Floating Rate Advantage is currently generating about 0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest 534.00 in Ashmore Emerging Markets on May 10, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 17.00 from holding Ashmore Emerging Markets or generate 3.18% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Ashmore Emerging Markets vs. Calvert Floating Rate Advantag
Performance |
Timeline |
Ashmore Emerging Markets |
Calvert Floating Rate |
Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate
The main advantage of trading using opposite Ashmore Emerging and Calvert Floating-rate positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ashmore Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Calvert Floating-rate can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Calvert Floating-rate will offset losses from the drop in Calvert Floating-rate's long position.Ashmore Emerging vs. Franklin Equity Income | Ashmore Emerging vs. Balanced Fund Retail | Ashmore Emerging vs. Western Asset Diversified | Ashmore Emerging vs. Dodge International Stock |
Calvert Floating-rate vs. Rbb Fund | Calvert Floating-rate vs. Chase Growth Fund | Calvert Floating-rate vs. Qs Growth Fund | Calvert Floating-rate vs. Sound Shore Fund |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges |