Correlation Between Designer Brands and Crocs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Designer Brands and Crocs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Designer Brands and Crocs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Designer Brands and Crocs Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Designer Brands and Crocs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Designer Brands with a short position of Crocs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Designer Brands and Crocs.

Diversification Opportunities for Designer Brands and Crocs

0.6
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Designer and Crocs is 0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Designer Brands and Crocs Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Crocs Inc and Designer Brands is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Designer Brands are associated (or correlated) with Crocs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Crocs Inc has no effect on the direction of Designer Brands i.e., Designer Brands and Crocs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Designer Brands and Crocs

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Designer Brands is expected to generate 2.21 times more return on investment than Crocs. However, Designer Brands is 2.21 times more volatile than Crocs Inc. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Crocs Inc is currently generating about 0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  261.00  in Designer Brands on April 22, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  32.00  from holding Designer Brands or generate 12.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Designer Brands  vs.  Crocs Inc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Designer Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Designer Brands are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly abnormal fundamental drivers, Designer Brands demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Crocs Inc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Crocs Inc are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly unfluctuating basic indicators, Crocs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

Designer Brands and Crocs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Designer Brands and Crocs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Designer Brands and Crocs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, Crocs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Crocs will offset losses from the drop in Crocs' long position.
The idea behind Designer Brands and Crocs Inc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals