Correlation Between Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cohen Steers Global and Goldman Sachs Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cohen Steers with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cohen and Goldman is 0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cohen Steers Global and Goldman Sachs Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Technology and Cohen Steers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cohen Steers Global are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Technology has no effect on the direction of Cohen Steers i.e., Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Cohen Steers is expected to generate 2.19 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Cohen Steers Global is 1.77 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Technology is currently generating about 0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,449  in Goldman Sachs Technology on May 10, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  469.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Technology or generate 13.6% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cohen Steers Global  vs.  Goldman Sachs Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cohen Steers Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Fair

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cohen Steers Global are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Technology are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cohen Steers and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cohen Steers position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Cohen Steers Global and Goldman Sachs Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets