Correlation Between Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Seligman Global and Calvert Mid Cap, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Seligman with a short position of Calvert Mid. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and Calvert is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Seligman Global and Calvert Mid Cap in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Calvert Mid Cap and Columbia Seligman is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Seligman Global are associated (or correlated) with Calvert Mid. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Calvert Mid Cap has no effect on the direction of Columbia Seligman i.e., Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Seligman Global is expected to generate 1.43 times more return on investment than Calvert Mid. However, Columbia Seligman is 1.43 times more volatile than Calvert Mid Cap. It trades about 0.28 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Calvert Mid Cap is currently generating about 0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  7,899  in Columbia Seligman Global on June 28, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,638  from holding Columbia Seligman Global or generate 20.74% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy98.41%
ValuesDaily Returns

Columbia Seligman Global  vs.  Calvert Mid Cap

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Columbia Seligman Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Seligman Global are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Columbia Seligman showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Calvert Mid Cap 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Mild

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Calvert Mid Cap are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Calvert Mid is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Seligman and Calvert Mid positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Seligman position performs unexpectedly, Calvert Mid can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Calvert Mid will offset losses from the drop in Calvert Mid's long position.
The idea behind Columbia Seligman Global and Calvert Mid Cap pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities