Correlation Between Calvert Large and Goldman Sachs

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Calvert Large and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Calvert Large and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Calvert Large Cap and Goldman Sachs Small, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Calvert Large and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Calvert Large with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Calvert Large and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Calvert Large and Goldman Sachs

0.87

Correlation Coefficient

Calvert Large  Goldman Sachs

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Calvert and Goldman is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Calvert Large Cap and Goldman Sachs Small in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Small and Calvert Large is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Calvert Large Cap are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Small has no effect on the direction of Calvert Large i.e., Calvert Large and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Calvert Large and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Calvert Large is expected to generate 6.72 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Calvert Large Cap is 12.11 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Small is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,656  in Goldman Sachs Small on May 20, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  258.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Small or generate 9.71% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Calvert Large Cap  vs.  Goldman Sachs Small

Calvert Large Cap

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Calvert Large Cap are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Calvert Large is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs Small

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Fair

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Small are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.

Pair Trading with Calvert Large and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Calvert Large and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Calvert Large position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.

The idea behind Calvert Large Cap and Goldman Sachs Small pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.