Correlation Between Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Colgate Palmolive with a short position of Energizer Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings

-0.7

Correlation Coefficient

Colgate Palmolive  Energizer Holdings

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Colgate and Energizer is -0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Energizer Holdings and Colgate Palmolive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Colgate Palmolive are associated (or correlated) with Energizer Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Energizer Holdings has no effect on the direction of Colgate Palmolive i.e., Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Colgate Palmolive is expected to under-perform the Energizer Holdings. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Colgate Palmolive is 3.99 times less risky than Energizer Holdings. The stock trades about -0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Energizer Holdings is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,136  in Energizer Holdings on July 2, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  353.00  from holding Energizer Holdings or generate 16.53% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Colgate Palmolive  vs.  Energizer Holdings

Colgate Palmolive

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weakest

Over the last 90 days Colgate Palmolive has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's essential indicators remain quite persistent which may send shares a bit higher in October 2025. The latest mess may also be a sign of long-standing up-swing for the company institutional investors.

Energizer Holdings

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Mild

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energizer Holdings are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively unsteady basic indicators, Energizer Holdings reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Colgate Palmolive position performs unexpectedly, Energizer Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energizer Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Energizer Holdings' long position.

The idea behind Colgate Palmolive and Energizer Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.