Correlation Between Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Intermediate High and Calvert Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Intermediate with a short position of Calvert Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging

0.94
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mfs and Calvert is 0.94. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Intermediate High and Calvert Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Calvert Emerging Markets and Mfs Intermediate is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Intermediate High are associated (or correlated) with Calvert Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Calvert Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Mfs Intermediate i.e., Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Mfs Intermediate is expected to generate 1.02 times less return on investment than Calvert Emerging. In addition to that, Mfs Intermediate is 1.01 times more volatile than Calvert Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.18 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Calvert Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.19 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,094  in Calvert Emerging Markets on April 17, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  91.00  from holding Calvert Emerging Markets or generate 8.32% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs Intermediate High  vs.  Calvert Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs Intermediate High 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Intermediate High are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile forward indicators, Mfs Intermediate may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.
Calvert Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Calvert Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Calvert Emerging may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Intermediate and Calvert Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Intermediate position performs unexpectedly, Calvert Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Calvert Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Calvert Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Mfs Intermediate High and Calvert Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges