Correlation Between City Holding and Penns Woods

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both City Holding and Penns Woods at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining City Holding and Penns Woods into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between City Holding and Penns Woods Bancorp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on City Holding and Penns Woods and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in City Holding with a short position of Penns Woods. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of City Holding and Penns Woods.

Diversification Opportunities for City Holding and Penns Woods

0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between City and Penns is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding City Holding and Penns Woods Bancorp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Penns Woods Bancorp and City Holding is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on City Holding are associated (or correlated) with Penns Woods. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Penns Woods Bancorp has no effect on the direction of City Holding i.e., City Holding and Penns Woods go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between City Holding and Penns Woods

Given the investment horizon of 90 days City Holding is expected to generate 1.07 times more return on investment than Penns Woods. However, City Holding is 1.07 times more volatile than Penns Woods Bancorp. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Penns Woods Bancorp is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11,600  in City Holding on May 7, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  490.00  from holding City Holding or generate 4.22% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy90.32%
ValuesDaily Returns

City Holding  vs.  Penns Woods Bancorp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
City Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Soft

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in City Holding are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy fundamental indicators, City Holding is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Penns Woods Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Soft

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Penns Woods Bancorp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, Penns Woods is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

City Holding and Penns Woods Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with City Holding and Penns Woods

The main advantage of trading using opposite City Holding and Penns Woods positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if City Holding position performs unexpectedly, Penns Woods can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Penns Woods will offset losses from the drop in Penns Woods' long position.
The idea behind City Holding and Penns Woods Bancorp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets