Correlation Between Columbia Pacific/asia and Infrastructure Fund

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Pacific/asia and Infrastructure Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Pacific/asia and Infrastructure Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Pacificasia Fund and Infrastructure Fund Institutional, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Pacific/asia and Infrastructure Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Pacific/asia with a short position of Infrastructure Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Pacific/asia and Infrastructure Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Pacific/asia and Infrastructure Fund

0.91

Correlation Coefficient

Columbia Pacific/asia  Infrastructure Fund

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and Infrastructure is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Pacificasia Fund and Infrastructure Fund Institutio in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Infrastructure Fund and Columbia Pacific/asia is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Pacificasia Fund are associated (or correlated) with Infrastructure Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Infrastructure Fund has no effect on the direction of Columbia Pacific/asia i.e., Columbia Pacific/asia and Infrastructure Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Pacific/asia and Infrastructure Fund

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Pacificasia Fund is expected to generate 2.81 times more return on investment than Infrastructure Fund. However, Columbia Pacific/asia is 2.81 times more volatile than Infrastructure Fund Institutional. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Infrastructure Fund Institutional is currently generating about 0.24 per unit of risk. If you would invest  854.00  in Columbia Pacificasia Fund on May 11, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  61.00  from holding Columbia Pacificasia Fund or generate 7.14% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Columbia Pacificasia Fund  vs.  Infrastructure Fund Institutio

Columbia Pacific/asia

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Pacificasia Fund are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Columbia Pacific/asia may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.

Infrastructure Fund

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Infrastructure Fund Institutional are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Infrastructure Fund is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Columbia Pacific/asia and Infrastructure Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Pacific/asia and Infrastructure Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Pacific/asia position performs unexpectedly, Infrastructure Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Infrastructure Fund will offset losses from the drop in Infrastructure Fund's long position.

The idea behind Columbia Pacificasia Fund and Infrastructure Fund Institutional pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.