Correlation Between Citigroup and SIMON
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and SIMON and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of SIMON. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and SIMON.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and SIMON
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and SIMON is -0.57. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SIMON PROPERTY GROUP and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with SIMON. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SIMON PROPERTY GROUP has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and SIMON go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and SIMON
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 2.21 times more return on investment than SIMON. However, Citigroup is 2.21 times more volatile than SIMON PROPERTY GROUP. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. SIMON PROPERTY GROUP is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest 9,208 in Citigroup on July 5, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 526.00 from holding Citigroup or generate 5.71% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 97.73% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. SIMON PROPERTY GROUP
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP |
Citigroup and SIMON Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and SIMON
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and SIMON positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, SIMON can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in SIMON will offset losses from the drop in SIMON's long position.Citigroup vs. Bank of America | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank |
SIMON vs. AEP TEX INC | SIMON vs. Scholar Rock Holding | SIMON vs. Ameren Illinois | SIMON vs. The Travelers Companies |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Global Markets Map Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes | |
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |