Correlation Between Citigroup and Global Engine

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Global Engine at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Global Engine into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Global Engine Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Global Engine and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Global Engine. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Global Engine.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Global Engine

0.43
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Global is 0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Global Engine Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Global Engine Group and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Global Engine. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Global Engine Group has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Global Engine go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Global Engine

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.12 times more return on investment than Global Engine. However, Citigroup is 8.62 times less risky than Global Engine. It trades about 0.38 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Global Engine Group is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,760  in Citigroup on May 1, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,821  from holding Citigroup or generate 41.73% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Global Engine Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Strong

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 30 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Global Engine Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Global Engine Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest weak performance, the Stock's essential indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.

Citigroup and Global Engine Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Global Engine

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Global Engine positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Global Engine can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global Engine will offset losses from the drop in Global Engine's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Global Engine Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas