Correlation Between Citigroup and FT Cboe
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and FT Cboe at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and FT Cboe into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and FT Cboe Vest, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and FT Cboe and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of FT Cboe. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and FT Cboe.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and FT Cboe
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and DJUN is 0.85. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and FT Cboe Vest in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FT Cboe Vest and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with FT Cboe. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FT Cboe Vest has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and FT Cboe go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and FT Cboe
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 4.75 times more return on investment than FT Cboe. However, Citigroup is 4.75 times more volatile than FT Cboe Vest. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. FT Cboe Vest is currently generating about 0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest 6,125 in Citigroup on August 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 859.00 from holding Citigroup or generate 14.02% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. FT Cboe Vest
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
FT Cboe Vest |
Citigroup and FT Cboe Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and FT Cboe
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and FT Cboe positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, FT Cboe can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FT Cboe will offset losses from the drop in FT Cboe's long position.Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings | Citigroup vs. HSBC Holdings PLC | Citigroup vs. Bank of Montreal |
FT Cboe vs. First Trust Cboe | FT Cboe vs. FT Cboe Vest | FT Cboe vs. Innovator SP 500 | FT Cboe vs. FT Cboe Vest |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Odds Of Bankruptcy module to get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years.
Other Complementary Tools
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |