Correlation Between Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Applied Materials, with a short position of California Nanotechnologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies.
Diversification Opportunities for Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies
-0.03 | Correlation Coefficient |
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Applied and California is -0.03. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on California Nanotechnologies and Applied Materials, is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Applied Materials, are associated (or correlated) with California Nanotechnologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of California Nanotechnologies has no effect on the direction of Applied Materials, i.e., Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Applied Materials, is expected to generate 0.35 times more return on investment than California Nanotechnologies. However, Applied Materials, is 2.83 times less risky than California Nanotechnologies. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. California Nanotechnologies Corp is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,781 in Applied Materials, on May 5, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 265.00 from holding Applied Materials, or generate 14.88% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Applied Materials, vs. California Nanotechnologies Co
Performance |
Timeline |
Applied Materials, |
California Nanotechnologies |
Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies
The main advantage of trading using opposite Applied Materials, and California Nanotechnologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Applied Materials, position performs unexpectedly, California Nanotechnologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in California Nanotechnologies will offset losses from the drop in California Nanotechnologies' long position.Applied Materials, vs. Uniserve Communications Corp | Applied Materials, vs. Summa Silver Corp | Applied Materials, vs. Computer Modelling Group | Applied Materials, vs. American Hotel Income |
California Nanotechnologies vs. MTY Food Group | California Nanotechnologies vs. Mako Mining Corp | California Nanotechnologies vs. Blackrock Silver Corp | California Nanotechnologies vs. Capstone Mining Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.
Other Complementary Tools
Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities |