Correlation Between Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Firsthand Alternative Energy and Evaluator Moderate Rms, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Firsthand Alternative with a short position of Evaluator Moderate. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate.

Diversification Opportunities for Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate

0.97
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Firsthand and Evaluator is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Firsthand Alternative Energy and Evaluator Moderate Rms in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Evaluator Moderate Rms and Firsthand Alternative is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Firsthand Alternative Energy are associated (or correlated) with Evaluator Moderate. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Evaluator Moderate Rms has no effect on the direction of Firsthand Alternative i.e., Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate

Assuming the 90 days horizon Firsthand Alternative Energy is expected to generate 2.93 times more return on investment than Evaluator Moderate. However, Firsthand Alternative is 2.93 times more volatile than Evaluator Moderate Rms. It trades about 0.3 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Evaluator Moderate Rms is currently generating about 0.24 per unit of risk. If you would invest  810.00  in Firsthand Alternative Energy on May 8, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  244.00  from holding Firsthand Alternative Energy or generate 30.12% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Firsthand Alternative Energy  vs.  Evaluator Moderate Rms

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Firsthand Alternative 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Firsthand Alternative Energy are ranked lower than 23 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Firsthand Alternative showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Evaluator Moderate Rms 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Evaluator Moderate Rms are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak primary indicators, Evaluator Moderate may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.

Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate

The main advantage of trading using opposite Firsthand Alternative and Evaluator Moderate positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Firsthand Alternative position performs unexpectedly, Evaluator Moderate can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Evaluator Moderate will offset losses from the drop in Evaluator Moderate's long position.
The idea behind Firsthand Alternative Energy and Evaluator Moderate Rms pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.

Other Complementary Tools

Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance