Mercury Systems Company Insiders
MRCY Stock | USD 39.98 1.06 2.72% |
Slightly above 67% of Mercury Systems' corporate insiders are selling. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that many Mercury Systems insiders are, at present, alarmed. Mercury Systems employs about 2.4 K people. The company is managed by 21 executives with a total tenure of roughly 36 years, averaging almost 1.0 years of service per executive, having 112.57 employees per reported executive.
Mark Aslett CEO CEO and President and Director |
Michelle McCarthy President Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller |
Mercury Systems' Insider Buying Vs Selling
33
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-11-18 | Charles Roger Iv Wells | Disposed 1527 @ 38.8 | View | ||
2024-09-16 | Douglas Munro | Disposed 69 @ 37.6 | View | ||
2024-08-30 | Debora A Plunkett | Disposed 1843 @ 38.07 | View | ||
2024-08-27 | Jana Partners Management, Lp | Acquired 13600 @ 37.25 | View | ||
2024-08-21 | Steven Ratner | Disposed 3891 @ 38.41 | View | ||
2024-08-19 | William L Ballhaus | Disposed 6549 @ 39.49 | View | ||
2024-02-20 | Steven Ratner | Disposed 129 @ 28.75 | View | ||
2024-02-16 | Stephanie Georges | Disposed 1409 @ 29.57 | View | ||
2024-02-12 | William L Ballhaus | Acquired 3413 @ 29.3 | View | ||
2024-02-09 | William L Ballhaus | Acquired 3653 @ 28.22 | View | ||
2023-12-19 | Michelle M Mccarthy | Disposed 231 @ 36.9 | View | ||
2023-11-30 | Jana Partners Management, Lp | Acquired 63648 @ 34.22 | View |
Monitoring Mercury Systems' insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Mercury |
Mercury Systems' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Mercury Systems' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Mercury will maintain a workforce of slightly above 2360 employees by December 2024.Mercury Systems Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0265) % which means that it has lost $0.0265 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of (0.079) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Mercury Systems' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Mercury Systems manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to rise to -0.02 in 2024. Return On Capital Employed is likely to rise to -0.01 in 2024. At this time, Mercury Systems' Total Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Non Current Assets Total is likely to rise to about 1.7 B in 2024, whereas Other Current Assets are likely to drop slightly above 14.9 M in 2024.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 36.4 M in 2024. Net Loss is likely to rise to about (31 M) in 2024
Mercury Systems Workforce Comparison
Mercury Systems is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Industrials industry is now estimated at about 50,562. Mercury Systems holds roughly 2,364 in number of employees claiming about 5% of equities under Industrials industry.
Mercury Systems Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of (0.14) %, which may suggest that it does not properly executes on its current pricing strategies or is unable to control all of the operational costs. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.12 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.12.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.33 | 0.2345 |
|
|
Mercury Systems Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Mercury Systems insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Mercury Systems' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Mercury Systems insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-12-01 | 4.0 | 8 | 2 | 38,656 | 16,920 |
2024-09-01 | 0.6364 | 7 | 11 | 164,950 | 28,223 |
2024-03-01 | 2.0 | 14 | 7 | 1,804,755 | 5,405 |
2023-12-01 | 3.0 | 15 | 5 | 573,660 | 6,393 |
2023-09-01 | 2.0 | 26 | 13 | 1,557,755 | 5,036 |
2023-03-01 | 0.1364 | 3 | 22 | 34,226 | 27,463 |
2022-12-01 | 9.0 | 9 | 1 | 34,522 | 1,691 |
2022-09-01 | 0.0417 | 1 | 24 | 5,000 | 46,934 |
2022-06-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 7,534 | 0.00 |
2022-03-01 | 15.0 | 15 | 1 | 468,600 | 764.00 |
2021-12-01 | 13.0 | 13 | 1 | 101,803 | 1,506 |
2021-09-01 | 0.4231 | 11 | 26 | 153,913 | 84,079 |
2020-12-01 | 0.5 | 8 | 16 | 15,600 | 25,300 |
2020-09-01 | 0.5 | 10 | 20 | 92,995 | 98,081 |
2020-03-01 | 0.0909 | 1 | 11 | 3,128 | 69,662 |
2019-12-01 | 1.0 | 7 | 7 | 13,727 | 41,000 |
2019-09-01 | 0.6 | 9 | 15 | 88,460 | 212,944 |
2018-12-01 | 1.0 | 8 | 8 | 24,828 | 35,490 |
2018-09-01 | 0.3462 | 9 | 26 | 110,250 | 153,358 |
2018-06-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 3,100 | 3,500 |
2018-03-01 | 0.1765 | 3 | 17 | 25,513 | 64,400 |
2017-12-01 | 0.4211 | 8 | 19 | 40,634 | 93,547 |
2017-09-01 | 0.4359 | 17 | 39 | 211,018 | 235,927 |
2017-06-01 | 0.25 | 3 | 12 | 47,683 | 117,606 |
2016-12-01 | 0.4348 | 10 | 23 | 86,116 | 291,897 |
2016-09-01 | 1.0833 | 13 | 12 | 377,500 | 155,786 |
2016-06-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 277,000 | 514,066 |
2015-12-01 | 2.0 | 8 | 4 | 107,125 | 55,518 |
2015-09-01 | 0.5714 | 8 | 14 | 159,064 | 160,349 |
2015-06-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 42,831 | 62,322 |
2014-12-01 | 1.6 | 8 | 5 | 147,051 | 208,039 |
2014-09-01 | 0.75 | 12 | 16 | 234,000 | 231,968 |
2013-09-01 | 0.4545 | 5 | 11 | 299,349 | 133,307 |
2012-09-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 609,954 | 50,719 |
2012-03-01 | 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 58,500 | 0.00 |
2011-12-01 | 2.3333 | 7 | 3 | 50,470 | 43,047 |
2011-09-01 | 0.875 | 7 | 8 | 76,000 | 51,042 |
2011-06-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 82,774 | 175,548 |
2010-12-01 | 4.0 | 12 | 3 | 103,332 | 12,741 |
2010-09-01 | 1.0 | 7 | 7 | 225,500 | 27,796 |
2009-12-01 | 14.0 | 14 | 1 | 93,331 | 9,072 |
2009-09-01 | 0.8333 | 5 | 6 | 284,500 | 6,313 |
2008-12-01 | 0.4706 | 8 | 17 | 108,000 | 49,072 |
2008-09-01 | 0.25 | 3 | 12 | 185,650 | 16,857 |
2008-06-01 | 0.1818 | 6 | 33 | 125,600 | 49,774 |
2008-03-01 | 0.7105 | 54 | 76 | 82,800 | 200,134 |
2007-12-01 | 1.375 | 11 | 8 | 467,285 | 6,300 |
2007-09-01 | 0.1579 | 3 | 19 | 18,000 | 29,819 |
2007-06-01 | 2.6667 | 16 | 6 | 173,541 | 28,223 |
2006-12-01 | 1.0 | 5 | 5 | 69,000 | 35,311 |
2006-09-01 | 0.5 | 8 | 16 | 56,313 | 153,673 |
2006-06-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 205,000 | 10,000 |
2006-03-01 | 2.0 | 14 | 7 | 109,230 | 30,134 |
2005-12-01 | 0.3846 | 5 | 13 | 20,674 | 37,574 |
2005-09-01 | 0.7368 | 14 | 19 | 50,367 | 82,600 |
2005-06-01 | 0.4737 | 9 | 19 | 27,636 | 68,586 |
2005-03-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 11,601 | 24,202 |
2004-12-01 | 0.125 | 1 | 8 | 4,000 | 8,000 |
2004-09-01 | 0.6471 | 11 | 17 | 154,812 | 29,124 |
2004-06-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 15,000 | 0.00 |
2003-09-01 | 10.0 | 10 | 1 | 138,568 | 40,568 |
Mercury Systems Notable Stakeholders
A Mercury Systems stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Mercury Systems often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Mercury Systems' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Mercury Systems' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
William Ballhaus | CEO President | Profile | |
Mark Aslett | CEO and President and Director | Profile | |
Michelle McCarthy | Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | Profile | |
Christopher Cambria | Senior Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
Michael Ruppert | CFO, Executive Vice President Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer | Profile | |
David Farnsworth | Executive CFO | Profile | |
Charles IV | Executive COO | Profile | |
Douglas Munro | VP Officer | Profile | |
Tod Brindlinger | Senior Operations | Profile | |
Stephanie Georges | Executive Officer | Profile | |
Imtiaz Iqbal | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Steven Ratner | Executive Officer | Profile | |
Stuart Kupinsky | Executive Officer | Profile | |
Allen Couture | Executive Excellence | Profile | |
Jeffrey Eason | VP Officer | Profile | |
Shanna Owens | Senior Growth | Profile | |
Thomas Huber | Ex Officer | Profile | |
Steve Ratner | Executive Officer | Profile | |
William Conley | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Robert McGrail | Director Communications | Profile | |
James Stevison | Ex Division | Profile |
About Mercury Systems Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Mercury Systems often depends on how effective the management is. Mercury Systems management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Mercury management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Mercury management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | (0.10) | (0.02) | |
Return On Capital Employed | (0.06) | (0.01) | |
Return On Assets | (0.05) | (0.01) | |
Return On Equity | (0.09) | (0.02) |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Mercury Systems' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Mercury Systems. Check Mercury Systems' Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Mercury Systems' management manipulating its earnings.
Mercury Systems Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Mercury Systems use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Mercury Systems within its industry.Mercury Systems Manpower Efficiency
Return on Mercury Systems Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 353.3K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 39.8M | |
Net Loss Per Employee | 58.2K | |
Net Loss Per Executive | 6.6M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 304.3K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 34.3M |
Additional Tools for Mercury Stock Analysis
When running Mercury Systems' price analysis, check to measure Mercury Systems' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Mercury Systems is operating at the current time. Most of Mercury Systems' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Mercury Systems' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Mercury Systems' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Mercury Systems to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.