Mind Technology Correlations
MIND Stock | USD 7.79 0.30 4.01% |
The current 90-days correlation between Mind Technology and Sono Tek Corp is -0.31 (i.e., Very good diversification). The correlation of Mind Technology is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Mind Technology Correlation With Market
Good diversification
The correlation between Mind Technology and DJI is -0.18 (i.e., Good diversification) for selected investment horizon. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mind Technology and DJI in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed.
Mind |
Moving together with Mind Stock
Moving against Mind Stock
0.93 | GNSS | Genasys | PairCorr |
0.8 | ST | Sensata Technologies | PairCorr |
0.8 | WATT | Energous | PairCorr |
0.63 | KNW | Know Labs | PairCorr |
0.34 | SVREW | SaverOne 2014 | PairCorr |
0.76 | NOVT | Novanta | PairCorr |
0.76 | CGNX | Cognex | PairCorr |
0.75 | SOBR | Sobr Safe | PairCorr |
0.65 | CPTNW | Cepton Inc | PairCorr |
0.45 | SVRE | SaverOne 2014 Buyout Trend | PairCorr |
0.36 | ASTC | Astrotech Corp | PairCorr |
0.81 | DZSI | DZS Inc | PairCorr |
0.81 | XELAP | Exela Technologies | PairCorr |
0.57 | SBIGW | SpringBig Holdings | PairCorr |
0.52 | EACO | Eaco Corp | PairCorr |
Related Correlations Analysis
Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Mind Stock performing well and Mind Technology Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Mind Technology's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEPJF | 2.24 | (0.17) | 0.00 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 5.16 | 12.94 | |||
ELSE | 1.65 | 0.44 | 0.17 | (1.35) | 1.71 | 3.66 | 12.02 | |||
SOTK | 2.09 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 2.94 | 3.94 | 18.96 | |||
VPG | 1.73 | 0.01 | (0.01) | (0.01) | 2.18 | 3.56 | 11.08 | |||
NSCIF | 3.73 | (0.27) | 0.00 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 21.64 | |||
SRMX | 24.92 | 5.51 | 0.14 | 3.68 | 20.21 | 100.00 | 150.00 | |||
GNSS | 2.57 | (0.38) | 0.00 | (0.44) | 0.00 | 4.53 | 25.63 | |||
ST | 1.46 | (0.36) | 0.00 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 3.30 | 10.42 | |||
SVREW | 22.18 | 2.02 | 0.07 | (1.10) | 21.71 | 71.43 | 143.18 | |||
MINDP | 1.76 | (0.05) | 0.00 | (0.33) | 0.00 | 3.20 | 22.57 |
Mind Technology Corporate Executives
Elected by the shareholders, the Mind Technology's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Mind Technology inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Mind. The board's role is to monitor Mind Technology's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Mind Technology's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Mind Technology's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.