Designer Brands (Germany) Performance
D9W Stock | EUR 2.78 0.06 2.11% |
On a scale of 0 to 100, Designer Brands holds a performance score of 4. The firm shows a Beta (market volatility) of 0.39, which means possible diversification benefits within a given portfolio. As returns on the market increase, Designer Brands' returns are expected to increase less than the market. However, during the bear market, the loss of holding Designer Brands is expected to be smaller as well. Please check Designer Brands' potential upside, skewness, and the relationship between the maximum drawdown and semi variance , to make a quick decision on whether Designer Brands' price patterns will revert.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Insignificant
Weak | Strong |
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Designer Brands are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Designer Brands reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point. ...more
Begin Period Cash Flow | 59.6 M | |
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities | -35 M |
Designer |
Designer Brands Relative Risk vs. Return Landscape
If you would invest 248.00 in Designer Brands on April 27, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 30.00 from holding Designer Brands or generate 12.1% return on investment over 90 days. Designer Brands is currently producing 0.3722% returns and takes up 6.2119% volatility of returns over 90 trading days. Put another way, 55% of traded stocks are less volatile than Designer, and 93% of all traded equity instruments are likely to generate higher returns over the next 90 trading days. Expected Return |
Risk |
Designer Brands Market Risk Analysis
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for Designer Brands' investment risk. Standard deviation is the most common way to measure market volatility of stocks, such as Designer Brands, and traders can use it to determine the average amount a Designer Brands' price has deviated from the expected return over a period of time. It is calculated by determining the expected price for the established period and then subtracting this figure from each price point. The differences are then squared, summed, and averaged to produce the variance.
Sharpe Ratio = 0.0599
Best Portfolio | Best Equity | |||
Good Returns | ||||
Average Returns | ||||
Small Returns | D9W | |||
Cash | Small Risk | Average Risk | High Risk | Huge Risk |
Negative Returns |
Estimated Market Risk
6.21 actual daily | 55 55% of assets are less volatile |
Expected Return
0.37 actual daily | 7 93% of assets have higher returns |
Risk-Adjusted Return
0.06 actual daily | 4 96% of assets perform better |
Based on monthly moving average Designer Brands is performing at about 4% of its full potential. If added to a well diversified portfolio the total return can be enhanced and market risk can be reduced. You can increase risk-adjusted return of Designer Brands by adding it to a well-diversified portfolio.
Designer Brands Fundamentals Growth
Designer Stock prices reflect investors' perceptions of the future prospects and financial health of Designer Brands, and Designer Brands fundamentals are critical determinants of its market performance. Overall, investors pay close attention to revenue and earnings growth, profit margins, and debt levels. These fundamentals can have a significant impact on Designer Stock performance.
Return On Equity | 0.34 | |||
Return On Asset | 0.059 | |||
Profit Margin | 0.04 % | |||
Operating Margin | 0.06 % | |||
Current Valuation | 1.72 B | |||
Shares Outstanding | 55.9 M | |||
Price To Earning | 4.21 X | |||
Price To Book | 1.69 X | |||
Price To Sales | 0.18 X | |||
Revenue | 3.2 B | |||
EBITDA | 205.15 M | |||
Cash And Equivalents | 49.3 M | |||
Cash Per Share | 0.68 X | |||
Total Debt | 225.54 M | |||
Debt To Equity | 4.57 % | |||
Book Value Per Share | 6.03 X | |||
Cash Flow From Operations | 171.43 M | |||
Earnings Per Share | 1.69 X | |||
Total Asset | 2.01 B | |||
About Designer Brands Performance
By analyzing Designer Brands' fundamental ratios, stakeholders can gain valuable insights into Designer Brands' financial health, operational efficiency, and overall profitability, helping them make informed investment and management decisions. For instance, if Designer Brands has a high ROA and ROE, it suggests that the company is efficiently using its assets and equity to generate substantial profits, making it an attractive investment. Conversely, if Designer Brands has a low ROA and ROE, it may indicate underlying issues in asset and equity management, signaling a need for operational improvements.
Designer Brands Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, and retails footwear and accessories for women, men, and kids primarily in North America. Designer Brands Inc. was founded in 1991 and is based in Columbus, Ohio. DESIGNER BRANDS operates under Apparel Retail classification in Germany and is traded on Frankfurt Stock Exchange. It employs 11400 people.Things to note about Designer Brands performance evaluation
Checking the ongoing alerts about Designer Brands for important developments is a great way to find new opportunities for your next move. Stock alerts and notifications screener for Designer Brands help investors to be notified of important events, changes in technical or fundamental conditions, and significant headlines that can affect investment decisions.Designer Brands had very high historical volatility over the last 90 days | |
Over 92.0% of the company shares are held by institutions such as insurance companies |
- Analyzing Designer Brands' financial statements, including its income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement, helps in understanding its overall financial health and growth potential.
- Getting a closer look at valuation ratios like price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, and price-to-book (P/B) ratio help in understanding whether Designer Brands' stock is overvalued or undervalued compared to its peers.
- Examining Designer Brands' industry or sector and how it is performing can give you an idea of its growth potential and how it is positioned relative to its competitors.
- Evaluating Designer Brands' management team can have a significant impact on its success or failure. Reviewing the track record and experience of Designer Brands' management team can help you assess the Company's leadership.
- Pay attention to analyst opinions and ratings of Designer Brands' stock. These opinions can provide insight into Designer Brands' potential for growth and whether the stock is currently undervalued or overvalued.
Complementary Tools for Designer Stock analysis
When running Designer Brands' price analysis, check to measure Designer Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Designer Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Designer Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Designer Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Designer Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Designer Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities |