Autoliv Net Worth
Autoliv Net Worth Breakdown | ALV |
Autoliv Net Worth Analysis
Autoliv's net worth analysis, or its valuation, is the process of determining the total value of the company. This involves assessing a range of factors, including Autoliv's financial performance, assets, liabilities, and potential for growth. The ultimate goal is to provide a clear understanding of Autoliv's overall worth, which can help investors make informed investment decisions. There are several methods that can be used to perform Autoliv's net worth analysis. One common approach is to calculate Autoliv's market capitalization.Another approach is to use the price-to-earnings ratio (P/E ratio), which compares Autoliv's stock price to its earnings per share (EPS). Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis is another popular method for assessing Autoliv's net worth. This approach calculates the present value of Autoliv's future cash flows, taking into account factors such as growth rate, profitability, and risk. By comparing the present value of Autoliv's cash flows to its current stock price, investors can gain a better understanding of the company's overall value. Finally, investors may use comparable company analysis to evaluate Autoliv's net worth. This involves comparing Autoliv's financial metrics to similar companies in the same industry. By identifying companies with similar financial characteristics, investors can gain insight into Autoliv's net worth relative to its peers.
To determine if Autoliv is a good investment, evaluating the company's potential for future growth is also very important. This may include expanding into new markets, launching new products or services, or improving operational efficiency. Companies with strong growth prospects can be more attractive investments. This aspect of the research should be conducted in the context of the overall market and industry in which the company operates and should include an analysis of growth potential, competitive landscape, and any regulatory or economic factors that could impact the business. Some of the essential points regarding Autoliv's net worth research are outlined below:
Autoliv has a strong financial position based on the latest SEC filings | |
About 72.0% of the company shares are held by institutions such as insurance companies | |
On 10th of June 2025 Autoliv paid $ 0.7 per share dividend to its current shareholders | |
Latest headline from gurufocus.com: Autoliv Faces Challenges Despite Record Q2 Performance |
Autoliv Quarterly Good Will |
|
Autoliv uses earnings reports to provide investors with an update of all three financial statements, including the income statement, the balance sheet, and the cash flow statement. Therefore, it is also crucial when considering investing in Autoliv. Every quarterly earnings report provides investors with an overview of sales, expenses, and net income for the most recent period. It also may provide a comparison to Autoliv's previous reporting period. The quarterly earnings reports are usually disseminated to the public via Form 10-Q, which is a legal document filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission every quarter.
26th of January 2024 Upcoming Quarterly Report | View | |
19th of April 2024 Next Financial Report | View | |
31st of December 2023 Next Fiscal Quarter End | View | |
26th of January 2024 Next Fiscal Year End | View | |
30th of September 2023 Last Quarter Report | View | |
31st of December 2022 Last Financial Announcement | View |
Autoliv Target Price Consensus
Autoliv target price is determined by taking all analyst projections and averaging them out. There is no one specific way to measure analysts' performance other than comparing it to past results via a very sophisticated attribution analysis. Autoliv's target price projections below should be used in combination with other traditional price prediction techniques such as stock price forecasting, investor sentiment analysis, technical analysis, earnings estimate, and various momentum models.
18 | Buy |
Most Autoliv analysts issue ratings four times a year, at intervals of three months. Ratings are usually accompanied by a target price to help potential investors understand Autoliv stock's fair price compared to its market value. Analysts arrive at stock ratings after researching the public financial statements of Autoliv, talking to its executives and customers, or listening to those companies' conference calls.
Macroaxis Advice Exposure ValuationAutoliv Target Price Projection
Autoliv's current and average target prices are 112.08 and 109.39, respectively. The current price of Autoliv is the price at which Autoliv is currently trading. On the other hand, Autoliv's target price is what analysts think the stock is worth or could sell for in the future. The more significant the discrepancy between the two prices, the more it stimulates investors to act.Target Price
Analyst Consensus On Autoliv Target Price
Know Autoliv's Top Institutional Investors
Have you ever been surprised when a price of an equity instrument such as Autoliv is soaring high without any particular reason? This is usually happening because many institutional investors are aggressively trading Autoliv backward and forwards among themselves. Autoliv's institutional investor refers to the entity that pools money to purchase Autoliv's securities or originate loans. Institutional investors include commercial and private banks, credit unions, insurance companies, pension funds, hedge funds, endowments, and mutual funds. Operating companies that invest excess capital in these types of assets may also be included in the term and may influence corporate governance by exercising voting rights in their investments.
Shares | Wellington Management Company Llp | 2025-03-31 | 1 M | Lancaster Investment Management Llp | 2025-03-31 | 903.5 K | Massachusetts Financial Services Company | 2025-03-31 | 793.3 K | Public Sector Pension Investment Board | 2025-03-31 | 684.8 K | Morgan Stanley - Brokerage Accounts | 2025-03-31 | 573.4 K | Lsv Asset Management | 2025-03-31 | 556.6 K | Park West Asset Management Llc | 2025-03-31 | 541.3 K | Northern Trust Corp | 2025-03-31 | 501.4 K | Tweedy, Browne Co Llc | 2025-03-31 | 433.7 K | Cevian Capital Ii Gp Limited | 2025-03-31 | 6.3 M | Fmr Inc | 2025-03-31 | 5.2 M |
Follow Autoliv's market capitalization trends
The company currently falls under 'Mid-Cap' category with a total capitalization of 8.66 B.Market Cap |
|
Project Autoliv's profitablity
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.10 | 0.05 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.23 | 0.25 | |
Return On Assets | 0.08 | 0.09 | |
Return On Equity | 0.28 | 0.30 |
When accessing Autoliv's net worth, it's important to look at multiple sources and consider different scenarios. For example, gross profit margin measures Autoliv's profitability after accounting for the cost of goods sold, while net profit margin measures profitability after accounting for all expenses. Other important metrics include return on assets, return on equity, and free cash flow. By reviewing multiple sources and metrics, you can gain a complete picture of Autoliv's profitability and make more informed investment decisions.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Autoliv's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Autoliv. Check Autoliv's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Autoliv's management manipulating its earnings.
Evaluate Autoliv's management efficiency
Autoliv has Return on Asset of 0.0791 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0791 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.2866 %, implying that it generated $0.2866 on every 100 dollars invested. Autoliv's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Autoliv manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Autoliv's Return On Capital Employed is fairly stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to climb to 0.09 in 2025, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.05 in 2025. At this time, Autoliv's Non Currrent Assets Other are fairly stable compared to the past year. Net Tangible Assets is likely to climb to about 1.2 B in 2025, whereas Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 3.6 B in 2025.Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Book Value Per Share | 28.49 | 23.85 | |
Tangible Book Value Per Share | 11.35 | 9.67 | |
Enterprise Value Over EBITDA | 6.76 | 4.98 | |
Price Book Value Ratio | 3.30 | 3.47 | |
Enterprise Value Multiple | 6.76 | 4.98 | |
Price Fair Value | 3.30 | 3.47 | |
Enterprise Value | 7.6 B | 6.7 B |
The decision-making processes within Autoliv are key to its success in a competitive market. By evaluating these processes, we assess the stock's potential for future gains.
Enterprise Value Revenue 1.0173 | Revenue | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.01) | Revenue Per Share | Return On Equity |
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Autoliv insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Autoliv's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases Autoliv insiders are required to file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Leif Johansson over a month ago Acquisition by Leif Johansson of tradable shares of Autoliv subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Fredrik Westin over two months ago Acquisition by Fredrik Westin of 4920 shares of Autoliv subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Yih Sng over three months ago Acquisition by Yih Sng of 687 shares of Autoliv subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Anthony Nellis over six months ago Acquisition by Anthony Nellis of tradable shares of Autoliv subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Fabien Dumont over six months ago Insider Trading | ||
Fabien Dumont over six months ago Insider Trading | ||
Fabien Dumont over six months ago Insider Trading | ||
Fabien Dumont over six months ago Insider Trading | ||
Fabien Dumont over six months ago Insider Trading | ||
Fabien Dumont over six months ago Insider Trading | ||
Fabien Dumont over six months ago Insider Trading | ||
Fabien Dumont over six months ago Insider Trading |
Autoliv Corporate Filings
8K | 18th of July 2025 Report filed with the SEC to announce major events that shareholders should know about | ViewVerify |
F4 | 12th of June 2025 The report filed by a party regarding the acquisition or disposition of a company's common stock, as well as derivative securities such as options, warrants, and convertible securities | ViewVerify |
2nd of June 2025 Other Reports | ViewVerify | |
25th of March 2025 Other Reports | ViewVerify |
Autoliv Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The calculation of Autoliv's earning per share is based on the data from the past 12 consecutive months, used for reporting the company's financial figures. The next projected EPS of Autoliv is estimated to be 1.97 with the future projection ranging from a low of 1.679 to a high of 2.3958. Please be aware that this consensus of annual earnings estimates for Autoliv is based on EPS before non-recurring items and includes expenses related to employee stock options.Last Reported EPS
1.68 Lowest | Expected EPS | 2.40 Highest |
Autoliv Earnings Projection Consensus
Suppose the current estimates of Autoliv's value are higher than the current market price of the Autoliv stock. In this case, investors may conclude that Autoliv is overpriced and will exhibit bullish sentiment. On the other hand, if the present value is lower than the stock price, analysts may conclude that the market undervalues the equity. These scenarios may suggest that the market is not as efficient as it should be at the estimation time, and Autoliv's stock will quickly adjusts to the new information provided by the consensus estimate.
Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 30th of June 2025 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
18 | 81.72% | 2.15 | 1.97 | 9.12 |
Autoliv Earnings History
Earnings estimate consensus by Autoliv analysts from Wall Street is used by the market to judge Autoliv's stock performance. Investors also use these earnings estimates to evaluate and project the stock performance into the future in order to make their investment decisions. However, we recommend analyzing not only Autoliv's upcoming profit reports and earnings-per-share forecasts but also comparing them to our different valuation methods.Autoliv Quarterly Gross Profit |
|
Autoliv Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earning per Share of Autoliv refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Autoliv predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Autoliv, the better is its profitability. While calculating the Earning per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Autoliv Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For an investor who is primarily interested in generating an income out of investing in entities such as Autoliv, the EPS ratio can tell if the company is intending to increase its current dividend. Although EPS is an essential tool for investors, it should not be used in isolation. EPS of Autoliv should always be considered in relation to other companies to make a more educated investment decision.Autoliv Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises can significantly impact Autoliv's stock price both in the short term and over time. Negative earnings surprises usually result in a price decline. However, it has been seen that positive earnings surprises lead to an immediate rise in a stock's price and a gradual increase over time. This is why we often hear news about some companies beating earning projections. Financial analysts spend a large amount of time predicting earnings per share (EPS) along with other important future indicators. Many analysts use forecasting models, management guidance, and additional fundamental information to derive an EPS estimate.
Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | null | null | null | 0 | ||
2025-04-24 | 2025-03-31 | 1.6708 | 2.15 | 0.4792 | 28 | ||
2025-01-24 | 2024-12-31 | 2.84 | 3.05 | 0.21 | 7 | ||
2024-10-18 | 2024-09-30 | 1.95 | 1.84 | -0.11 | 5 | ||
2024-07-19 | 2024-06-30 | 2.23 | 1.87 | -0.36 | 16 | ||
2024-04-26 | 2024-03-31 | 1.42 | 1.58 | 0.16 | 11 | ||
2024-01-26 | 2023-12-31 | 3.27 | 3.74 | 0.47 | 14 | ||
2023-10-20 | 2023-09-30 | 1.85 | 1.66 | -0.19 | 10 | ||
2023-07-21 | 2023-06-30 | 1.44 | 1.93 | 0.49 | 34 | ||
2023-04-21 | 2023-03-31 | 0.96 | 0.9 | -0.06 | 6 | ||
2023-01-27 | 2022-12-31 | 1.76 | 1.83 | 0.07 | 3 | ||
2022-10-21 | 2022-09-30 | 1.27 | 1.23 | -0.04 | 3 | ||
2022-07-22 | 2022-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.9 | 0.54 | 150 | ||
2022-04-22 | 2022-03-31 | 1.11 | 0.45 | -0.66 | 59 | ||
2022-01-28 | 2021-12-31 | 1.18 | 1.3 | 0.12 | 10 | ||
2021-10-22 | 2021-09-30 | 0.84 | 0.73 | -0.11 | 13 | ||
2021-07-16 | 2021-06-30 | 1.42 | 1.2 | -0.22 | 15 | ||
2021-04-23 | 2021-03-31 | 1.42 | 1.79 | 0.37 | 26 | ||
2021-01-26 | 2020-12-31 | 1.93 | 2.19 | 0.26 | 13 | ||
2020-10-23 | 2020-09-30 | 1.13 | 1.48 | 0.35 | 30 | ||
2020-07-17 | 2020-06-30 | -1.03 | -1.4 | -0.37 | 35 | ||
2020-04-24 | 2020-03-31 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2020-01-28 | 2019-12-31 | 1.76 | 1.84 | 0.08 | 4 | ||
2019-10-25 | 2019-09-30 | 1.42 | 1.3 | -0.12 | 8 | ||
2019-07-19 | 2019-06-30 | 1.45 | 1.38 | -0.07 | 4 | ||
2019-04-26 | 2019-03-31 | 1.62 | 1.2 | -0.42 | 25 | ||
2019-01-29 | 2018-12-31 | 1.75 | 1.42 | -0.33 | 18 | ||
2018-10-26 | 2018-09-30 | 1.68 | 1.35 | -0.33 | 19 | ||
2018-07-27 | 2018-06-30 | 1.77 | 2.22 | 0.45 | 25 | ||
2018-04-27 | 2018-03-31 | 1.8 | 1.66 | -0.14 | 7 | ||
2018-01-30 | 2017-12-31 | 1.73 | 2.03 | 0.3 | 17 | ||
2017-10-26 | 2017-09-30 | 1.34 | 1.47 | 0.13 | 9 | ||
2017-07-21 | 2017-06-30 | 1.5 | 1.44 | -0.06 | 4 | ||
2017-04-28 | 2017-03-31 | 1.55 | 1.65 | 0.1 | 6 | ||
2017-02-02 | 2016-12-31 | 1.84 | 1.71 | -0.13 | 7 | ||
2016-10-27 | 2016-09-30 | 1.38 | 1.62 | 0.24 | 17 | ||
2016-07-22 | 2016-06-30 | 1.71 | 1.75 | 0.04 | 2 | ||
2016-04-29 | 2016-03-31 | 1.51 | 1.66 | 0.15 | 9 | ||
2016-01-29 | 2015-12-31 | 1.91 | 2.08 | 0.17 | 8 | ||
2015-10-23 | 2015-09-30 | 1.44 | 1.53 | 0.09 | 6 | ||
2015-07-17 | 2015-06-30 | 1.54 | 1.62 | 0.08 | 5 | ||
2015-04-22 | 2015-03-31 | 1.31 | 1.42 | 0.11 | 8 | ||
2015-01-29 | 2014-12-31 | 1.63 | 1.81 | 0.18 | 11 | ||
2014-10-23 | 2014-09-30 | 1.41 | 1.25 | -0.16 | 11 | ||
2014-07-18 | 2014-06-30 | 1.55 | 1.45 | -0.1 | 6 | ||
2014-04-25 | 2014-03-31 | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2014-01-31 | 2013-12-31 | 1.53 | 1.7 | 0.17 | 11 | ||
2013-10-24 | 2013-09-30 | 1.35 | 1.31 | -0.04 | 2 | ||
2013-07-19 | 2013-06-30 | 1.38 | 1.48 | 0.1 | 7 | ||
2013-04-26 | 2013-03-31 | 1.23 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 7 | ||
2013-01-31 | 2012-12-31 | 1.32 | 1.58 | 0.26 | 19 | ||
2012-10-23 | 2012-09-30 | 1.45 | 1.3 | -0.15 | 10 | ||
2012-07-20 | 2012-06-30 | 1.42 | 1.39 | -0.03 | 2 | ||
2012-04-27 | 2012-03-31 | 1.6 | 1.56 | -0.04 | 2 | ||
2012-02-08 | 2011-12-31 | 1.69 | 1.7 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2011-10-25 | 2011-09-30 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2011-07-21 | 2011-06-30 | 1.28 | 1.54 | 0.26 | 20 | ||
2011-04-20 | 2011-03-31 | 1.76 | 1.93 | 0.17 | 9 | ||
2011-02-01 | 2010-12-31 | 1.73 | 1.89 | 0.16 | 9 | ||
2010-10-26 | 2010-09-30 | 1.26 | 1.51 | 0.25 | 19 | ||
2010-07-23 | 2010-06-30 | 1.36 | 1.6 | 0.24 | 17 | ||
2010-04-27 | 2010-03-31 | 1.32 | 1.39 | 0.07 | 5 | ||
2010-01-29 | 2009-12-31 | 0.8 | 1.39 | 0.59 | 73 | ||
2009-10-20 | 2009-09-30 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.08 | 28 | ||
2009-07-21 | 2009-06-30 | -0.42 | 0.02 | 0.44 | 104 | ||
2009-04-21 | 2009-03-31 | -0.9 | -0.75 | 0.15 | 16 | ||
2009-01-29 | 2008-12-31 | -0.05 | -0.17 | -0.12 | 240 | ||
2008-10-21 | 2008-09-30 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.14 | 22 | ||
2008-07-22 | 2008-06-30 | 1.23 | 1.24 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2008-04-22 | 2008-03-31 | 0.98 | 1.11 | 0.13 | 13 | ||
2008-01-31 | 2007-12-31 | 1.22 | 1.36 | 0.14 | 11 | ||
2007-10-25 | 2007-09-30 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.04 | 5 | ||
2007-07-26 | 2007-06-30 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2007-04-26 | 2007-03-31 | 0.96 | 0.91 | -0.05 | 5 | ||
2007-02-08 | 2006-12-31 | 0.98 | 0.97 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2006-10-26 | 2006-09-30 | 0.85 | 0.68 | -0.17 | 20 | ||
2006-07-26 | 2006-06-30 | 0.97 | 1.0 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2006-04-27 | 2006-03-31 | 0.97 | 1.13 | 0.16 | 16 | ||
2006-02-09 | 2005-12-31 | 0.94 | 0.81 | -0.13 | 13 | ||
2005-10-20 | 2005-09-30 | 0.67 | 0.66 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2005-07-21 | 2005-06-30 | 0.98 | 0.94 | -0.04 | 4 | ||
2005-04-21 | 2005-03-31 | 0.9 | 0.93 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2005-01-27 | 2004-12-31 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2004-10-21 | 2004-09-30 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.05 | 7 | ||
2004-07-22 | 2004-06-30 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.06 | 6 | ||
2004-04-22 | 2004-03-31 | 0.74 | 0.8 | 0.06 | 8 | ||
2004-01-22 | 2003-12-31 | 0.64 | 0.78 | 0.14 | 21 | ||
2003-10-16 | 2003-09-30 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.04 | 8 | ||
2003-07-17 | 2003-06-30 | 0.56 | 0.75 | 0.19 | 33 | ||
2003-01-23 | 2002-12-31 | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.04 | 8 | ||
2002-07-18 | 2002-06-30 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.06 | 12 | ||
2002-04-18 | 2002-03-31 | 0.33 | 0.4 | 0.07 | 21 | ||
2002-01-25 | 2001-12-31 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 28 | ||
2001-11-01 | 2001-09-30 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 50 | ||
2001-07-26 | 2001-06-30 | 0.42 | 0.31 | -0.11 | 26 | ||
2000-07-20 | 2000-06-30 | 0.59 | 0.54 | -0.05 | 8 | ||
2000-04-19 | 2000-03-31 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-01-27 | 1999-12-31 | 0.58 | 0.6 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
1999-10-21 | 1999-09-30 | 0.45 | 0.42 | -0.03 | 6 | ||
1999-07-22 | 1999-06-30 | 0.47 | 0.5 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
1999-04-22 | 1999-03-31 | 0.5 | 0.43 | -0.07 | 14 | ||
1999-01-28 | 1998-12-31 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
1998-10-22 | 1998-09-30 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
1998-07-23 | 1998-06-30 | 0.44 | 0.5 | 0.06 | 13 | ||
1998-04-22 | 1998-03-31 | 0.43 | 0.41 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
1998-02-02 | 1997-12-31 | 0.47 | 0.45 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
1997-10-22 | 1997-09-30 | 0.35 | 0.34 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
1997-08-05 | 1997-06-30 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.0 | 0 |
Autoliv Corporate Directors
FranzJosef Kortuem | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
David Kepler | Independent Director | Profile | |
Leif Johansson | Independent Director | Profile | |
James Ringler | Lead Independent Director | Profile |
Already Invested in Autoliv?
The danger of trading Autoliv is mainly related to its market volatility and Company specific events. As an investor, you must understand the concept of risk-adjusted return before you start trading. The most common way to measure the risk of Autoliv is by using the Sharpe ratio. The ratio expresses how much excess return you acquire for the extra volatility you endure for holding a more risker asset than Autoliv. The Sharpe ratio is calculated by using standard deviation and excess return to determine reward per unit of risk. To understand how volatile Autoliv is, you must compare it to a benchmark. Traditionally, the risk-free rate of return is the rate of return on the shortest-dated U.S. Treasury, such as a 3-year bond.
Additional Tools for Autoliv Stock Analysis
When running Autoliv's price analysis, check to measure Autoliv's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Autoliv is operating at the current time. Most of Autoliv's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Autoliv's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Autoliv's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Autoliv to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.