Ranger Net Receivables vs Property Plant And Equipment Net Analysis
RNGR Stock | USD 15.81 0.27 1.74% |
Ranger Energy financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just breaking down Ranger Energy Services prevalent accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Ranger Energy Services is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Ranger Energy Net Receivables and its Property Plant And Equipment Net accounts. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Ranger Energy Services. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in price.
Net Receivables vs Property Plant And Equipment Net
Net Receivables vs Property Plant And Equipment Net Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Ranger Energy Services Net Receivables account and Property Plant And Equipment Net. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have very strong relationship.
The correlation between Ranger Energy's Net Receivables and Property Plant And Equipment Net is 0.88. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Net Receivables that can explain the historical movement of Property Plant And Equipment Net in the same time period over historical financial statements of Ranger Energy Services, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Ranger Energy's Net Receivables and Property Plant And Equipment Net is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Net Receivables of Ranger Energy Services are associated (or correlated) with its Property Plant And Equipment Net. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Property Plant And Equipment Net has no effect on the direction of Net Receivables i.e., Ranger Energy's Net Receivables and Property Plant And Equipment Net go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.88 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Strong |
Net Receivables
Property Plant And Equipment Net
The total value of a company's physical assets (such as land, buildings, and equipment) used in operations, net of depreciation. It reflects the company's investment in assets used for production.Most indicators from Ranger Energy's fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Ranger Energy Services current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Ranger Energy Services. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in price. At this time, Ranger Energy's Tax Provision is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/19/2024, Enterprise Value Over EBITDA is likely to grow to 3.81, while Issuance Of Capital Stock is likely to drop 0.00.
2023 | 2024 (projected) | Depreciation And Amortization | 39.9M | 30.3M | Interest Income | 6.7M | 3.7M |
Ranger Energy fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Ranger Energy Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Ranger Energy fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 293.5M | 240.6M | 393.1M | 381.6M | 378M | 298.1M | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 55.6M | 33.5M | 68.3M | 28M | 14.9M | 14.2M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 55.1M | 33M | 102.7M | 74.5M | 69M | 56.6M | |
Other Liab | 700K | 1.8M | 5M | 4.7M | 5.4M | 5.7M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 103.9M | 101.9M | 240.8M | 259.1M | 298.0M | 312.9M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 225.4M | 195.2M | 277.4M | 232.8M | 235.3M | 212.2M | |
Net Debt | 48.7M | 30.7M | 67.7M | 24.3M | (800K) | (760K) | |
Accounts Payable | 13.8M | 10.5M | 20.7M | 24.3M | 31.3M | 19.4M | |
Cash | 6.9M | 2.8M | 600K | 3.7M | 15.7M | 16.5M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 234.8M | 204.9M | 287.9M | 241.5M | 242.6M | 223.1M | |
Long Term Debt | 26.6M | 14.5M | 18.4M | 11.6M | 13.3M | 19.2M | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 6.9M | 2.8M | 600K | 3.7M | 15.7M | 16.5M | |
Net Receivables | 42.7M | 27M | 93.8M | 118.1M | 85.4M | 57.5M | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 8.6M | 8.5M | 13.6M | 23.4M | 25.0M | 13.4M | |
Long Term Debt Total | 7.3M | 51.3M | 30.2M | 11.6M | 13.3M | 21.8M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 293.5M | 240.6M | 393.1M | 381.6M | 378M | 298.1M | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 35.4M | 22.8M | 41.7M | 40.9M | 37.2M | 31.9M | |
Other Current Assets | 5.3M | 3.6M | 8.3M | 12.4M | 27.9M | 29.3M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | 121.1M | 120.1M | 256.4M | 258.8M | 243.1M | 178.8M | |
Total Liab | 90.5M | 55.8M | 144.4M | 115.4M | 106.2M | 88.4M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Gross | 225.4M | 189M | 277.4M | 232.8M | 431.9M | 235.5M | |
Total Current Assets | 58.7M | 35.7M | 105.2M | 140.1M | 135.4M | 75.0M | |
Short Term Debt | 20.9M | 12.5M | 46.3M | 14.1M | 8M | 7.6M | |
Property Plant Equipment | 225.4M | 195.2M | 277.4M | 232.8M | 267.7M | 206.4M | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 1M | 1.6M | 100K | 1.2M | 2.7M | 1.3M | |
Capital Lease Obligations | 13.2M | 9M | 5.8M | 9.6M | 33.8M | 35.5M | |
Inventory | 3.8M | 2.3M | 2.5M | 5.9M | 6.4M | 4.5M | |
Non Current Liabilities Other | 700K | 1.8M | 17.5M | 19.7M | 11M | 7.7M | |
Intangible Assets | 9.3M | 8.5M | 7.8M | 7.1M | 6.3M | 6.9M | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 18.4M | 9.3M | 30.3M | 1.7M | 2.0M | 1.9M | |
Retained Earnings | (8.1M) | (18.4M) | (8M) | 7.1M | 28.4M | 29.8M |
Pair Trading with Ranger Energy
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Ranger Energy position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ranger Energy will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Ranger Stock
Moving against Ranger Stock
0.67 | XPRO | Expro Group Holdings | PairCorr |
0.49 | DTI | Drilling Tools Inter | PairCorr |
0.33 | WFRD | Weatherford International | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Ranger Energy could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Ranger Energy when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Ranger Energy - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Ranger Energy Services to buy it.
The correlation of Ranger Energy is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Ranger Energy moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Ranger Energy Services moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Ranger Energy can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Ranger Stock Analysis
When running Ranger Energy's price analysis, check to measure Ranger Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Ranger Energy is operating at the current time. Most of Ranger Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Ranger Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Ranger Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Ranger Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.