Restaurant Brands International Stock Working Capital

QSR Stock  USD 65.54  0.30  0.46%   
Restaurant Brands International fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Restaurant Brands' financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Restaurant Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Restaurant Brands' intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Restaurant Brands stock.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Net Working Capital29 M27.6 M
Change In Working Capital-291 M-276.4 M
As of 12/29/2024, Net Working Capital is likely to drop to about 27.6 M. In addition to that, Change In Working Capital is likely to grow to about (276.4 M).
  
This module does not cover all equities due to inconsistencies in global equity categorizations. Continue to Equity Screeners to view more equity screening tools.

Restaurant Brands International Company Working Capital Analysis

Restaurant Brands' Working Capital is a measure of company efficiency and operating liquidity. The working capital is usually calculated by subtracting Current Liabilities from Current Assets. It is an important indicator of the firm ability to continue its normal operations without additional debt obligations. .

Working Capital

 = 

Current Assets

-

Current Liabilities

More About Working Capital | All Equity Analysis

Current Restaurant Brands Working Capital

    
  29 M  
Most of Restaurant Brands' fundamental indicators, such as Working Capital, are part of a valuation analysis module that helps investors searching for stocks that are currently trading at higher or lower prices than their real value. If the real value is higher than the market price, Restaurant Brands International is considered to be undervalued, and we provide a buy recommendation. Otherwise, we render a sell signal.

Restaurant Working Capital Driver Correlations

Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Restaurant Brands is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Restaurant Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Working Capital. Since Restaurant Brands' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Restaurant Brands' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Restaurant Brands' interrelated accounts and indicators.
0.560.550.730.971.0-0.820.980.990.980.910.950.90.84-0.930.890.910.01-0.920.320.64-0.350.30.170.53
0.560.060.170.360.53-0.350.370.550.550.440.360.390.63-0.380.520.720.53-0.520.51-0.170.150.0-0.04-0.05
0.550.060.930.610.53-0.680.60.530.510.610.740.820.56-0.660.780.54-0.22-0.660.00.85-0.690.85-0.130.29
0.730.170.930.780.72-0.830.780.710.720.740.870.910.65-0.810.840.7-0.19-0.830.010.85-0.630.75-0.030.46
0.970.360.610.780.98-0.851.00.970.950.90.970.910.76-0.940.870.83-0.12-0.90.190.76-0.460.340.160.58
1.00.530.530.720.98-0.830.981.00.980.890.950.890.82-0.940.880.910.0-0.930.290.64-0.380.260.160.51
-0.82-0.35-0.68-0.83-0.85-0.83-0.84-0.83-0.85-0.71-0.87-0.81-0.580.8-0.78-0.79-0.060.940.19-0.650.48-0.4-0.13-0.43
0.980.370.60.781.00.98-0.840.970.960.910.970.920.78-0.940.870.83-0.12-0.90.220.76-0.410.350.210.63
0.990.550.530.710.971.0-0.830.970.970.890.940.880.81-0.930.880.910.0-0.920.310.62-0.390.260.130.48
0.980.550.510.720.950.98-0.850.960.970.860.930.870.83-0.920.850.920.06-0.940.230.59-0.260.260.280.59
0.910.440.610.740.90.89-0.710.910.890.860.890.930.79-0.840.910.76-0.1-0.80.360.72-0.360.520.080.54
0.950.360.740.870.970.95-0.870.970.940.930.890.950.8-0.960.910.86-0.16-0.930.210.8-0.520.490.120.55
0.90.390.820.910.910.89-0.810.920.880.870.930.950.81-0.890.960.81-0.15-0.880.240.83-0.50.630.060.52
0.840.630.560.650.760.82-0.580.780.810.830.790.80.81-0.830.830.860.12-0.760.60.5-0.150.410.250.47
-0.93-0.38-0.66-0.81-0.94-0.940.8-0.94-0.93-0.92-0.84-0.96-0.89-0.83-0.87-0.890.160.92-0.33-0.730.53-0.4-0.13-0.47
0.890.520.780.840.870.88-0.780.870.880.850.910.910.960.83-0.870.870.0-0.880.320.73-0.530.59-0.070.33
0.910.720.540.70.830.91-0.790.830.910.920.760.860.810.86-0.890.870.16-0.940.380.44-0.340.270.110.29
0.010.53-0.22-0.19-0.120.0-0.06-0.120.00.06-0.1-0.16-0.150.120.160.00.16-0.07-0.05-0.460.28-0.26-0.07-0.26
-0.92-0.52-0.66-0.83-0.9-0.930.94-0.9-0.92-0.94-0.8-0.93-0.88-0.760.92-0.88-0.94-0.07-0.1-0.620.46-0.38-0.12-0.41
0.320.510.00.010.190.290.190.220.310.230.360.210.240.6-0.330.320.38-0.05-0.1-0.030.080.08-0.050.0
0.64-0.170.850.850.760.64-0.650.760.620.590.720.80.830.5-0.730.730.44-0.46-0.62-0.03-0.670.670.060.55
-0.350.15-0.69-0.63-0.46-0.380.48-0.41-0.39-0.26-0.36-0.52-0.5-0.150.53-0.53-0.340.280.460.08-0.67-0.450.540.18
0.30.00.850.750.340.26-0.40.350.260.260.520.490.630.41-0.40.590.27-0.26-0.380.080.67-0.45-0.220.28
0.17-0.04-0.13-0.030.160.16-0.130.210.130.280.080.120.060.25-0.13-0.070.11-0.07-0.12-0.050.060.54-0.220.65
0.53-0.050.290.460.580.51-0.430.630.480.590.540.550.520.47-0.470.330.29-0.26-0.410.00.550.180.280.65
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Working Capital can be positive or negative, depending on how much of current debt the company is carrying on its balance sheet. In general terms, companies that have a lot of working capital will experience more growth in the near future since they can expand and improve their operations using existing resources. On the other hand, companies with small or negative working capital may lack the funds necessary for growth or future operation. Working Capital also shows if the company has sufficient liquid resources to satisfy short-term liabilities and operational expenses.
Competition

Restaurant Capital Lease Obligations

Capital Lease Obligations

1.64 Billion

At this time, Restaurant Brands' Capital Lease Obligations is relatively stable compared to the past year.
Based on the company's disclosures, Restaurant Brands International has a Working Capital of 29 M. This is 99.51% lower than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and 123.56% lower than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The working capital for all United States stocks is 98.04% higher than that of the company.

Restaurant Working Capital Peer Comparison

Stock peer comparison is one of the most widely used and accepted methods of equity analyses. It analyses Restaurant Brands' direct or indirect competition against its Working Capital to detect undervalued stocks with similar characteristics or determine the stocks which would be a good addition to a portfolio. Peer analysis of Restaurant Brands could also be used in its relative valuation, which is a method of valuing Restaurant Brands by comparing valuation metrics of similar companies.
Restaurant Brands is currently under evaluation in working capital category among its peers.

Restaurant Brands ESG Sustainability

Some studies have found that companies with high sustainability scores are getting higher valuations than competitors with lower social-engagement activities. While most ESG disclosures are voluntary and do not directly affect the long term financial condition, Restaurant Brands' sustainability indicators can be used to identify proper investment strategies using environmental, social, and governance scores that are crucial to Restaurant Brands' managers, analysts, and investors.
Environmental
Governance
Social

Restaurant Fundamentals

About Restaurant Brands Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Restaurant Brands International's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Restaurant Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Restaurant Brands International based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving against Restaurant Stock

  0.71CSV Carriage ServicesPairCorr
  0.7WH Wyndham Hotels ResortsPairCorr
  0.69BH Biglari HoldingsPairCorr
  0.69EAT Brinker InternationalPairCorr
  0.64EXPE Expedia GroupPairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Additional Tools for Restaurant Stock Analysis

When running Restaurant Brands' price analysis, check to measure Restaurant Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Restaurant Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Restaurant Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Restaurant Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Restaurant Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Restaurant Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.