Roberto Motta - Restaurant Brands Independent Director

QSR Stock  USD 67.52  0.95  1.39%   

Director

Mr. Roberto Moses Thompson Motta is an Independent Director of the Company. Mr. Thompson Motta has served on our Board since December 2014. Previously, Mr. Thompson Motta served on the board of BKW from July 2013 until December 2014. From 1986 to 1992, Mr. Thompson Motta worked in the corporate finance department of Banco Garantia, Brazils largest investment bank. From 1993 to 2004, he was the founding and managing partner of GP Investimentos and a member of its board of directors until September 2010. Mr. Thompson Motta has also served as a member of the boards of directors of Companhia de Bebidas das Amricas, or AMBEV, a Brazilian brewing company, since September 1998, Lojas Americanas since August 2001, So Carlos Empreendimentos e Participaes S.A. since September 2001 and StoneCo Ltd., a leading provider of financial technology solutions, since October 2018. From August 2004 until April 2014, Mr. Thompson Motta served on the board of directors of Anheuser Busch InBev. Mr. Thompson Motta is one of the founding partners of 3G Capital and continues to serve as a board member. since 2014.
Age 62
Tenure 10 years
Address 130 King Street West, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5X 1E1
Phone905 339 6011
Webhttps://www.rbi.com

Restaurant Brands Management Efficiency

The company has Return on Asset of 0.0586 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0586 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.3731 %, implying that it generated $0.3731 on every 100 dollars invested. Restaurant Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Restaurant Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 11/18/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.10. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.07. At this time, Restaurant Brands' Other Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/18/2024, Non Currrent Assets Other is likely to grow to about 1.3 B, while Total Assets are likely to drop slightly above 13.8 B.
Restaurant Brands International has 14.52 B in debt with debt to equity (D/E) ratio of 3.71, meaning that the company heavily relies on borrowing funds for operations. Restaurant Brands has a current ratio of 0.87, suggesting that it has not enough short term capital to pay financial commitments when the payables are due. Note however, debt could still be an excellent tool for Restaurant to invest in growth at high rates of return.

Similar Executives

Found 13 records

DIRECTOR Age

Robert KnappBarings BDC
55
Norio TakatsuChiba Bank Ltd
61
Kin YuenEmerson Radio
64
Kareem SethiEmerson Radio
41
Arihiko TotsukaChiba Bank Ltd
N/A
Mark MulhernBarings BDC
60
Thomas OkelBarings BDC
57
Tadayoshi ShinozakiChiba Bank Ltd
58
John SwitzerBarings BDC
63
Jill OlmsteadBarings BDC
56
Chigusa SaitoChiba Bank Ltd
N/A
Michael BinneyEmerson Radio
65
Tsutomu YonemotoChiba Bank Ltd
59
Restaurant Brands International Inc. operates as quick service restaurant company in Canada and internationally. Restaurant Brands International Inc. was founded in 1954 and is headquartered in Toronto, Canada. Restaurant Brands operates under Restaurants classification in the United States and is traded on New York Stock Exchange. It employs 5700 people. Restaurant Brands International (QSR) is traded on New York Stock Exchange in USA. It is located in 130 King Street West, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5X 1E1 and employs 9,000 people. Restaurant Brands is listed under Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure category by Fama And French industry classification.

Management Performance

Restaurant Brands Leadership Team

Elected by the shareholders, the Restaurant Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Restaurant Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Restaurant. The board's role is to monitor Restaurant Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Restaurant Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Restaurant Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Alexandre Behring, Executive Chairman, Chairman of Compensation Committee and Chairman of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Matthew Dunnigan, Chief Financial Officer
Axel Schwan, President - Tim Hortons Americas
Thecla Sweeney, Independent Director
Daniel Schwartz, Executive Chairman of the Board, Co-Chairman
Joshua Kobza, Chief Operating Officer
Thomas Curtis, President Canada
Sami Siddiqui, President - Popeyes Americas
Jacqueline Friesner, Principal Accounting Officer, Controller
Christopher Finazzo, President - Burger King Americas
Fernando Machado, Chief Marketing Officer
Jeff Housman, Chief Officer
Golnar Khosrowshahi, Independent Director
Roberto Motta, Independent Director
Patrick Doyle, Executive Chairman
Marc Lemann, Independent Director
Carlos Sicupira, Independent Director
Jill Granat, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary
David Shear, President - International
Duncan Fulton, Chief Corporate Officer
Felipe Athayde, President - Popeyes Americas
Maximilien Stirum, Independent Director
Jason Melbourne, Independent Director
Paul Fribourg, Lead Independent Director
Stephen Lichtner, Director Relations
Neil Golden, Independent Director
Jose Cil, President of Burger King(R) Brand
Kendall Peck, Head Relations
Ali Hedayat, Independent Director
Chris Brigleb, Head IR
Joao CastroNeves, Independent Director
Giovanni Prato, Independent Director

Restaurant Stock Performance Indicators

The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Restaurant Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Moving against Restaurant Stock

  0.56SCI Service International Sell-off TrendPairCorr
  0.48CSV Carriage ServicesPairCorr
  0.43XPOF Xponential FitnessPairCorr
  0.41BTBDW BT Brands WarrantPairCorr
  0.4BTCTW BTC DigitalPairCorr
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Additional Tools for Restaurant Stock Analysis

When running Restaurant Brands' price analysis, check to measure Restaurant Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Restaurant Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Restaurant Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Restaurant Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Restaurant Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Restaurant Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.