Victoria EvansFaw - City Holding Senior Secretary
| CHCO Stock | USD 122.07 1.02 0.84% |
Executive
Victoria EvansFaw is Senior Secretary of City Holding
| Address | 25 Gatewater Road, Charleston, WV, United States, 25313 |
| Phone | 304 769 1100 |
| Web | https://www.bankatcity.com |
City Holding Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0185 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0185 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.1715 %, meaning that it created $0.1715 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. City Holding's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well City Holding manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 24th of December 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.01. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.02. At this time, City Holding's Total Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 24th of December 2024, Non Current Assets Total is likely to grow to about 6.3 B, while Other Assets are likely to drop about 10.1 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | EXECUTIVE Age | ||
| Julie DeHart | Oak Valley Bancorp | 50 | |
| Cindy Dabney | Sierra Bancorp | 64 | |
| Deborah Neyens | QCR Holdings | N/A | |
| Peter Brown | Magyar Bancorp | 59 | |
| Denise Jereb | Community West Bancshares | N/A | |
| Dawn Cagle | Community West Bancshares | N/A | |
| Christopher Neros | First Northwest Bancorp | N/A | |
| Theresa Roland | Oak Valley Bancorp | 45 | |
| Alexandra Blazar | Sierra Bancorp | N/A | |
| Tonia Taylor | QCR Holdings | N/A | |
| Blaine Lauhon | Community West Bancshares | 61 | |
| Jeffrey Martin | Investar Holding Corp | 58 | |
| Jamie Huynh | Plumas Bancorp | N/A | |
| Nick Anderson | QCR Holdings | 49 | |
| Monte McNew | QCR Holdings | 51 | |
| Michael Petrucelli | Oak Valley Bancorp | N/A | |
| Catherine Ghan | Oak Valley Bancorp | 63 | |
| Linda Hischier | Community West Bancshares | N/A | |
| Elizabeth Kuipers | Plumas Bancorp | 61 | |
| Charles Bennett | Colony Bankcorp | N/A | |
| Kimberly Booke | Oak Valley Bancorp | 54 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.17 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0185 |
City Holding Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the City Holding's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: City Holding inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of City. The board's role is to monitor City Holding's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. City Holding's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, City Holding's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| John DeRito, Executive VP of Commercial Banking and Executive VP of Commercial Banking for City National Bank | ||
| Jeffrey Legge, Chief Admin. Officer, CIO, Sr. VP, Chief Admin. Officer of City National Bank, CIO of City National Bank and Sr. VP of City National Bank | ||
| David CPA, CFO VP | ||
| Charles Hageboeck, CEO and President Director, Member of Executive Committee, CEO of City National Bank and President of City National Bank | ||
| Michael Quinlan, Executive Banking | ||
| Victoria EvansFaw, Senior Secretary | ||
| David Bumgarner, CFO, Chief Accounting Officer, Sr. VP, CFO of City National Bank and Sr. VP of City National Bank |
City Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is City Holding a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.17 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0185 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.40 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.51 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.97 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 14.7 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 4.00 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 71.43 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 905.34 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 19.79 X |
Pair Trading with City Holding
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if City Holding position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in City Holding will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with City Stock
| 0.94 | AX | Axos Financial | PairCorr |
| 0.92 | BY | Byline Bancorp Fiscal Year End 23rd of January 2025 | PairCorr |
| 0.93 | PB | Prosperity Bancshares Fiscal Year End 22nd of January 2025 | PairCorr |
Moving against City Stock
| 0.63 | CFG-PE | Citizens Financial | PairCorr |
| 0.53 | TFC-PR | Truist Financial | PairCorr |
| 0.48 | TFC-PO | Truist Financial | PairCorr |
| 0.32 | WF | Woori Financial Group | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to City Holding could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace City Holding when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back City Holding - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling City Holding to buy it.
The correlation of City Holding is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as City Holding moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if City Holding moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for City Holding can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in City Holding. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators. To learn how to invest in City Stock, please use our How to Invest in City Holding guide.You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.
Is Regional Banks space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of City Holding. If investors know City will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about City Holding listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.019 | Dividend Share 2.93 | Earnings Share 7.8 | Revenue Per Share 19.688 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.026 |
The market value of City Holding is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of City that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of City Holding's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is City Holding's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because City Holding's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect City Holding's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between City Holding's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if City Holding is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, City Holding's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.