Public Service Company Top Insiders
PEG Stock | USD 86.68 0.89 1.04% |
Public Service's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Public Service Enterprise stock suggests that almost all insiders are panicking at this time. Public Service employs about 13 K people. The company is managed by 32 executives with a total tenure of roughly 149 years, averaging almost 4.0 years of service per executive, having 407.72 employees per reported executive.
Ralph Izzo Chairman Chairman, CEO and President and Chairman of Executive Committee |
Tamara Linde President Executive Vice President, General Counsel |
Insider Sentiment 0
Mostly Selling
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2025-07-01 | Ralph A Larossa | Disposed 1387 @ 83.12 | View | ||
2025-05-01 | Ralph A Larossa | Disposed 1378 @ 79.26 | View | ||
2025-04-01 | Ralph A Larossa | Disposed 1378 @ 82.88 | View | ||
2025-02-03 | Ralph A Larossa | Disposed 1378 @ 83.1 | View | ||
2025-01-02 | Ralph A Larossa | Disposed 1378 @ 84.91 | View | ||
2024-11-19 | Kim C Hanemann | Disposed 956 @ 90.09 | View | ||
2024-11-11 | Richard T Thigpen | Disposed 5900 @ 87.95 | View | ||
2024-10-09 | Tamara Louise Linde | Disposed 9564 @ 90.61 | View | ||
2024-10-01 | Ralph A Larossa | Disposed 1378 @ 90.2 | View | ||
2024-09-09 | Tamara Louise Linde | Disposed 9563 @ 79.54 | View | ||
2024-09-04 | John James | Disposed @ 81 | |||
2024-09-03 | Ralph A Larossa | Disposed 1378 @ 80.69 | View | ||
2024-08-15 | Tamara Louise Linde | Disposed 19127 @ 80.26 | View |
Monitoring Public Service's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Public Service Enterprise. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in income. Public Service's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Public Service's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Public will maintain a workforce of roughly 13050 employees by August 2025.Public Service Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0294 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0294 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.114 %, implying that it generated $0.114 on every 100 dollars invested. Public Service's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Public Service manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Public Service's Return On Capital Employed is most likely to slightly decrease in the upcoming years. The Public Service's current Return On Equity is estimated to increase to 0.13, while Return On Tangible Assets are projected to decrease to 0.03. The Public Service's current Asset Turnover is estimated to increase to 0.35, while Total Assets are projected to decrease to roughly 35.7 B.The current Common Stock Shares Outstanding is estimated to decrease to about 518.5 M. The current Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is estimated to decrease to about 1.3 B
Public Service Workforce Comparison
Public Service Enterprise is regarded fourth in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Utilities industry is at this time estimated at about 99,504. Public Service retains roughly 13,047 in number of employees claiming about 13% of Utilities industry.
Public Service Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin of 0.17 %, which implies that it may need a different competitive strategy as even a very small decline in it revenue may erase profits and result in a net loss. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows Net Operating Margin of 0.25 %, which entails that for every 100 dollars of revenue, it generated $0.25 of operating income.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.52 | 0.3441 |
|
|
Public Service Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Public Service insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Public Service's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Public Service insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025-06-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 22,890 | 4,134 |
2025-03-01 | 0.5758 | 19 | 33 | 329,939 | 174,621 |
2024-06-01 | 2.5 | 10 | 4 | 25,790 | 4,321 |
2024-03-01 | 0.68 | 17 | 25 | 138,815 | 51,418 |
2023-12-01 | 0.1667 | 1 | 6 | 1,920 | 6,096 |
2023-03-01 | 1.0 | 17 | 17 | 125,071 | 43,473 |
2022-09-01 | 0.125 | 1 | 8 | 22,444 | 32,363 |
2022-06-01 | 2.1667 | 13 | 6 | 33,995 | 30,249 |
2022-03-01 | 0.64 | 16 | 25 | 206,059 | 143,973 |
2021-12-01 | 0.125 | 1 | 8 | 819.24 | 45,119 |
2021-09-01 | 0.1667 | 1 | 6 | 885.65 | 15,870 |
2021-06-01 | 1.375 | 11 | 8 | 21,627 | 45,367 |
2021-03-01 | 0.64 | 16 | 25 | 371,468 | 199,576 |
2020-12-01 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | 945.97 | 6,157 |
2020-09-01 | 0.1667 | 1 | 6 | 992.98 | 6,557 |
2020-06-01 | 2.5 | 10 | 4 | 25,713 | 7,607 |
2020-03-01 | 0.7826 | 18 | 23 | 350,704 | 71,260 |
2019-09-01 | 0.1429 | 2 | 14 | 57,984 | 178,361 |
2019-06-01 | 0.8 | 12 | 15 | 107,648 | 263,930 |
2019-03-01 | 0.9545 | 21 | 22 | 330,043 | 275,000 |
2018-12-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 87,921 | 272,077 |
2018-09-01 | 0.2222 | 2 | 9 | 29,944 | 128,285 |
2018-06-01 | 3.0 | 12 | 4 | 27,916 | 78,899 |
2018-03-01 | 1.6 | 16 | 10 | 293,878 | 77,231 |
2017-12-01 | 0.3889 | 7 | 18 | 233,743 | 530,669 |
2017-09-01 | 0.3333 | 3 | 9 | 54,449 | 116,290 |
2017-06-01 | 1.4 | 14 | 10 | 122,009 | 206,591 |
2017-03-01 | 1.1739 | 27 | 23 | 451,238 | 261,752 |
2016-12-01 | 0.625 | 5 | 8 | 92,060 | 222,371 |
2016-09-01 | 0.7692 | 10 | 13 | 146,918 | 288,668 |
2016-06-01 | 0.8333 | 15 | 18 | 149,240 | 299,830 |
2016-03-01 | 0.6944 | 25 | 36 | 481,258 | 353,126 |
2015-12-01 | 0.0428 | 8 | 187 | 122,599 | 245,476 |
2015-09-01 | 0.0264 | 7 | 265 | 179,510 | 369,076 |
2015-06-01 | 2.75 | 11 | 4 | 27,405 | 22,215 |
2015-03-01 | 0.7692 | 20 | 26 | 462,502 | 238,077 |
2014-12-01 | 0.1429 | 4 | 28 | 79,461 | 119,450 |
2014-09-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 3,234 | 1,000.00 |
2014-06-01 | 5.5 | 11 | 2 | 28,266 | 6,462 |
2014-03-01 | 0.2055 | 15 | 73 | 359,997 | 256,437 |
2013-12-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 2,590 | 4,780 |
2013-09-01 | 0.2308 | 3 | 13 | 23,515 | 40,075 |
2013-06-01 | 0.5 | 11 | 22 | 28,640 | 60,000 |
2013-03-01 | 2.1429 | 15 | 7 | 204,353 | 53,487 |
2012-12-01 | 0.0548 | 4 | 73 | 75,860 | 152,477 |
2012-09-01 | 0.0781 | 5 | 64 | 79,197 | 136,097 |
2012-06-01 | 0.5714 | 16 | 28 | 112,375 | 136,181 |
2012-03-01 | 0.2571 | 18 | 70 | 259,938 | 160,024 |
2011-12-01 | 0.3396 | 18 | 53 | 141,304 | 134,930 |
2011-09-01 | 0.8889 | 16 | 18 | 29,238 | 44,725 |
2011-06-01 | 10.3333 | 31 | 3 | 98,505 | 5,000 |
2011-03-01 | 2.5 | 10 | 4 | 1,971 | 1,291 |
2010-12-01 | 20.0 | 40 | 2 | 171,369 | 15,227 |
2010-06-01 | 41.0 | 41 | 1 | 183,985 | 4,000 |
2010-03-01 | 4.0 | 16 | 4 | 5,044 | 33,934 |
2009-12-01 | 8.5 | 34 | 4 | 663,385 | 3,421 |
2009-09-01 | 12.0 | 24 | 2 | 3,436 | 6,100 |
2009-06-01 | 10.5 | 42 | 4 | 174,978 | 106,800 |
2009-03-01 | 4.0 | 20 | 5 | 54,192 | 120,963 |
2008-12-01 | 3.0 | 33 | 11 | 1,030,549 | 44,277 |
2008-09-01 | 21.0 | 21 | 1 | 57,196 | 0.00 |
2008-06-01 | 4.4444 | 40 | 9 | 37,277 | 35,200 |
2008-03-01 | 1.0909 | 12 | 11 | 14,449 | 35,032 |
2007-12-01 | 1.7143 | 24 | 14 | 200,475 | 24,395 |
2007-09-01 | 2.0 | 10 | 5 | 17,412 | 42,597 |
2007-06-01 | 1.0 | 24 | 24 | 65,116 | 101,450 |
2007-03-01 | 1.1212 | 37 | 33 | 537,105 | 458,213 |
2006-12-01 | 1.1622 | 43 | 37 | 220,580 | 404,387 |
2006-09-01 | 3.0 | 24 | 8 | 150,690 | 300,000 |
2006-06-01 | 0.9714 | 34 | 35 | 557,522 | 1,088,284 |
2006-03-01 | 0.7091 | 39 | 55 | 669,993 | 1,356,966 |
2005-12-01 | 0.9556 | 43 | 45 | 781,644 | 1,276,767 |
2005-09-01 | 1.0182 | 56 | 55 | 755,193 | 1,421,136 |
2005-06-01 | 0.8788 | 29 | 33 | 481,283 | 974,119 |
2005-03-01 | 2.4667 | 37 | 15 | 388,845 | 482,239 |
2004-12-01 | 4.5556 | 41 | 9 | 1,845 | 256,337 |
2004-06-01 | 13.75 | 55 | 4 | 390,020 | 20,200 |
2004-03-01 | 2.8 | 28 | 10 | 72,729 | 142,668 |
2003-12-01 | 8.3333 | 25 | 3 | 2,275 | 35,600 |
2003-06-01 | 2.0 | 4 | 2 | 579.12 | 75,000 |
2001-12-01 | 5.0 | 5 | 1 | 810,000 | 25,000 |
2000-12-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 1,040,000 | 15,000 |
1999-12-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 350,000 | 8,000 |
Public Service Notable Stakeholders
A Public Service stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Public Service often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Public Service's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Public Service's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Ralph Izzo | Chairman, CEO and President and Chairman of Executive Committee | Profile | |
Tamara Linde | Executive Vice President, General Counsel | Profile | |
Kim Hanemann | President Gas | Profile | |
Shahid Malik | President ERT | Profile | |
Daniel Cregg | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
David Daly | President of PSE&G, President and Chief Operating Officer of PSEG Utilities and Clean Energy Ventures - Service | Profile | |
Charles McFeaters | President LLC | Profile | |
Ralph LaRossa | President of Public Service Electric and Gas Company and Chief Operating Offcicer of Public Service Electric and Gas Company | Profile | |
Rose Chernick | Vice President, Controller | Profile | |
Shirley Jackson | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Alfred Zollar | Independent Director | Profile | |
Barry Ostrowsky | Independent Director | Profile | |
Willie Deese | Independent Director | Profile | |
Laura Sugg | Independent Director | Profile | |
David Lilley | Independent Director | Profile | |
Susan Tomasky | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Derek DiRisio | Principal Accounting Officer, VP and Controller | Profile | |
Tamara Esq | Executive Counsel | Profile | |
Courtney McCormick | Enterprise Audit | Profile | |
Justin Incardone | Corporate Cyber | Profile | |
Michael Hyun | Senior Partnerships | Profile | |
Zeeshan Sheikh | Senior Vice President Chief Information and Digital Officer | Profile | |
Richard Thigpen | Senior Citizenship | Profile | |
Karen Cleeve | Vice Communications | Profile | |
Carlotta Chan | Vice Relations | Profile | |
Valerie Smith | Independent Director | Profile | |
Grace Park | Executive Counsel | Profile | |
Joe Forline | Vice President - Gas Operations | Profile | |
Scott Stephenson | Independent Director | Profile | |
Sheila Rostiac | Chief Resources | Profile | |
Jamie Gentoso | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Surma | Independent Director | Profile |
About Public Service Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Public Service Enterprise often depends on how effective the management is. Public Service management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Public management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Public management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.05 | 0.09 | |
Return On Assets | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
Return On Equity | 0.11 | 0.13 |
Public Service Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Public Service use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Public Service within its industry.Public Service Manpower Efficiency
Return on Public Service Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 788.7K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 321.6M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 135.8K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 55.4M |
Complementary Tools for Public Stock analysis
When running Public Service's price analysis, check to measure Public Service's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Public Service is operating at the current time. Most of Public Service's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Public Service's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Public Service's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Public Service to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios |