CMS Energy Company Insiders
CMSC Stock | USD 24.62 0.05 0.20% |
CMS Energy employs about 20 people. The company is managed by 24 executives with a total tenure of roughly 160 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 0.83 employees per reported executive. Evaluation of CMS Energy's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
Garrick Rochow CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
John Russell Chairman Independent Chairman of the Board |
CMS |
CMS Energy's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with CMS Energy's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that CMS will maintain a workforce of about 11650 employees by December 2024.CMS Energy Management Team Effectiveness
The current year's Return On Tangible Assets is expected to grow to 0.03. The current year's Return On Capital Employed is expected to grow to 0.05. At present, CMS Energy's Return On Tangible Assets are projected to slightly decrease based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Debt To Assets is expected to grow to 0.50, whereas Total Assets are forecasted to decline to about 19.7 B. CMS Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well CMS Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.As of November 19, 2024, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is expected to decline to about 199.2 M. In addition to that, Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is expected to decline to about 597.1 M
CMS Energy Workforce Comparison
CMS Energy Corp is number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Utilities industry is currently estimated at about 145,541. CMS Energy adds roughly 20.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of Utilities industry.
CMS Energy Insider Trading
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific CMS Energy insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on CMS Energy's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, CMS Energy insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Catherine Hendrian over a month ago Disposition of 2795 shares by Catherine Hendrian of CMS Energy at 63.92 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Brandon Hofmeister over two months ago Disposition of 1667 shares by Brandon Hofmeister of CMS Energy at 56.2735 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Scott McIntosh over two months ago Disposition of 449 shares by Scott McIntosh of CMS Energy subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Brian Rich over three months ago Disposition of 447 shares by Brian Rich of CMS Energy subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Brian Rich over six months ago Acquisition by Brian Rich of 3544 shares of CMS Energy subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Catherine Hendrian over six months ago Disposition of 1314 shares by Catherine Hendrian of CMS Energy subject to Rule 16b-3 |
CMS Energy Notable Stakeholders
A CMS Energy stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as CMS Energy often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. CMS Energy's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting CMS Energy's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Garrick Rochow | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
John Russell | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Scott McIntosh | Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President - Tax, Controller | Profile | |
Brian Rich | Senior Vice President - Customer Experience and Technology, Chief Customer Officer | Profile | |
Catherine Hendrian | Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Brandon Hofmeister | Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Glenn Barba | Vice President Controller, Chief Accounting Officer | Profile | |
Jean Brossoit | Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Shaun Johnson | Senior Vice President General Counsel | Profile | |
Rejji Hayes | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Venkat Rao | Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Laura Wright | Independent Director | Profile | |
William Harvey | Presiding Independent Director | Profile | |
John Sznewajs | Independent Director | Profile | |
Kurt Darrow | Independent Director | Profile | |
Myrna Soto | Independent Director | Profile | |
Deborah Butler | Independent Director | Profile | |
Suzanne Shank | Independent Director | Profile | |
Jon Barfield | Independent Director | Profile | |
Angela Thompkins | Vice President and Chief Diversity Officer | Profile | |
Norm Kapala | Vice President | Profile | |
LeeRoy Wells | Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Tonya Berry | Senior Vice President - Transformation and Engineering | Profile | |
Ronald Tanski | Independent Director | Profile |
About CMS Energy Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as CMS Energy Corp often depends on how effective the management is. CMS Energy management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of CMS management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the CMS management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.04 | 0.05 | |
Return On Assets | 0.03 | 0.03 | |
Return On Equity | 0.12 | 0.12 |
Please note, the presentation of CMS Energy's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, CMS Energy's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of CMS Energy's management manipulating its earnings.
CMS Energy Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as CMS Energy use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare CMS Energy within its industry.CMS Energy Manpower Efficiency
Return on CMS Energy Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 373.1M | |
Revenue Per Executive | 310.9M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 40.4M | |
Net Income Per Executive | 33.7M |
Complementary Tools for CMS Stock analysis
When running CMS Energy's price analysis, check to measure CMS Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy CMS Energy is operating at the current time. Most of CMS Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of CMS Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move CMS Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of CMS Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities |