Affiliated Ebitda vs Cost Of Revenue Analysis
MGR Stock | USD 23.97 0.33 1.36% |
Affiliated Managers financial indicator trend analysis is way more than just evaluating Affiliated Managers prevailing accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Affiliated Managers is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Affiliated Managers Ebitda and its Cost Of Revenue accounts. Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Affiliated Managers Group. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in price.
Ebitda vs Cost Of Revenue
Ebitda vs Cost Of Revenue Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Affiliated Managers Ebitda account and Cost Of Revenue. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have very strong relationship.
The correlation between Affiliated Managers' Ebitda and Cost Of Revenue is 0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Ebitda that can explain the historical movement of Cost Of Revenue in the same time period over historical financial statements of Affiliated Managers Group, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Affiliated Managers' Ebitda and Cost Of Revenue is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Ebitda of Affiliated Managers Group are associated (or correlated) with its Cost Of Revenue. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Cost Of Revenue has no effect on the direction of Ebitda i.e., Affiliated Managers' Ebitda and Cost Of Revenue go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.81 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Strong |
Ebitda
Cost Of Revenue
Cost of Revenue is found on Affiliated Managers income statement and represents the costs associated with goods and services Affiliated Managers provides. Indirect cost, such as salaries, is not included. In other words, cost of revenue is the total cost incurred to obtain a sale. It is more than the traditional cost of goods sold, since it includes specific selling and marketing activities.Most indicators from Affiliated Managers' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Affiliated Managers current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Affiliated Managers Group. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in price. At this time, Affiliated Managers' Selling General Administrative is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/13/2024, Sales General And Administrative To Revenue is likely to grow to 0.35, while Tax Provision is likely to drop slightly above 147.5 M.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Gross Profit | 1.4B | 1.3B | 1.2B | 938.2M | Total Revenue | 2.4B | 2.3B | 2.1B | 1.5B |
Affiliated Managers fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Affiliated Managers Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Affiliated Managers fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 7.7B | 7.9B | 8.9B | 8.9B | 9.1B | 5.1B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 2.2B | 2.4B | 2.5B | 2.6B | 2.5B | 2.7B | |
Other Current Liab | 184.9M | 671.9M | 750.2M | (503.2M) | 589.4M | 618.9M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 634.6M | 712.4M | 789.1M | 778.3M | 628.5M | 448.5M | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 2.9B | 2.8B | 2.8B | 3.2B | 3.6B | 1.9B | |
Net Debt | 1.3B | 1.3B | 1.6B | 2.1B | 1.7B | 1.8B | |
Retained Earnings | 3.8B | 4.0B | 4.6B | 5.7B | 6.4B | 6.7B | |
Accounts Payable | 634.6M | 712.4M | 789.1M | 778.3M | 895.0M | 939.8M | |
Cash | 539.6M | 1.0B | 908.5M | 429.2M | 813.6M | 854.3M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 6.6B | 6.4B | 7.5B | 7.4B | 7.4B | 4.3B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | (146.2M) | (192.5M) | (272.1M) | (200.1M) | (219.9M) | (208.9M) | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 599M | 1.1B | 987M | 1.1B | 1.3B | 1.3B | |
Net Receivables | 417.1M | 421.6M | 419.2M | 316M | 368.4M | 264.4M | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 50.6M | 46.7M | 44.8M | 49M | 42.2M | 48.6M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 7.7B | 7.9B | 8.9B | 8.9B | 9.1B | 5.1B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 2.6B | 3.2B | 3.7B | 3.5B | 3.5B | 2.0B | |
Other Current Assets | (1.0B) | (1.5B) | (1.4B) | (1.5B) | (1.6B) | (1.6B) | |
Other Stockholder Equity | (4.6B) | (5.1B) | (6.3B) | (8.0B) | (9.0B) | (8.6B) | |
Total Liab | 3.2B | 3.9B | 4.5B | 4.2B | 4.1B | 2.4B | |
Total Current Assets | 1.0B | 1.5B | 1.4B | 1.5B | 1.6B | 1.7B | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (108.8M) | (98.3M) | (87.9M) | (203.4M) | (167.6M) | (159.2M) | |
Short Term Debt | 449.7M | 40.5M | 38.9M | 38.5M | 39.1M | 37.1M | |
Intangible Assets | 1.2B | 1.0B | 2.0B | 1.9B | 1.8B | 1.1B | |
Current Deferred Revenue | (576.4M) | 450M | 423M | 464.7M | 534.4M | 561.1M | |
Good Will | 2.7B | 2.7B | 2.7B | 2.6B | 2.5B | 2.2B | |
Short Term Investments | 59.4M | 74.9M | 78.5M | 716.9M | 461M | 484.1M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 20.5M | (259M) | (1.2B) | (829M) | (953.4M) | (905.7M) | |
Warrants | 916.7M | 671.5M | 673.9M | 465.4M | 418.9M | 555.7M | |
Noncontrolling Interest In Consolidated Entity | 561.6M | 537.6M | 924.2M | 945.3M | 850.8M | 653.4M | |
Other Assets | 4.4B | 1.1B | 1.4B | 265.2M | 2.1B | 2.2B | |
Long Term Debt | 1.8B | 2.3B | 2.5B | 2.5B | 2.9B | 2.2B | |
Retained Earnings Total Equity | 3.8B | 4.0B | 4.6B | 5.7B | 6.6B | 3.9B | |
Long Term Debt Total | 1.8B | 2.3B | 2.5B | 2.5B | 2.9B | 2.2B | |
Capital Surpluse | 707.2M | 728.9M | 651.6M | 695.5M | 799.8M | 797.5M | |
Deferred Long Term Liab | 450.2M | 423.4M | 503.2M | 464.7M | 418.2M | 399.6M | |
Long Term Investments | 2.4B | 2.3B | 2.5B | 2.6B | 2.9B | 2.8B | |
Treasury Stock | (1.5B) | (1.9B) | (2.3B) | (3.0B) | (2.7B) | (2.5B) |
Pair Trading with Affiliated Managers
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Affiliated Managers position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Affiliated Managers will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Affiliated Stock
Moving against Affiliated Stock
0.81 | BKKT | Bakkt Holdings Tech Boost | PairCorr |
0.77 | KSPI | Joint Stock | PairCorr |
0.64 | PRE | Prenetics Global | PairCorr |
0.63 | MOGO | Mogo Inc Tech Boost | PairCorr |
0.56 | KPLTW | Katapult Holdings Equity | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Affiliated Managers could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Affiliated Managers when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Affiliated Managers - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Affiliated Managers Group to buy it.
The correlation of Affiliated Managers is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Affiliated Managers moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Affiliated Managers moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Affiliated Managers can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Affiliated Stock Analysis
When running Affiliated Managers' price analysis, check to measure Affiliated Managers' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Affiliated Managers is operating at the current time. Most of Affiliated Managers' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Affiliated Managers' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Affiliated Managers' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Affiliated Managers to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.