Vr Etf Performance
The entity has a beta of 0.34, which indicates possible diversification benefits within a given portfolio. As returns on the market increase, VR's returns are expected to increase less than the market. However, during the bear market, the loss of holding VR is expected to be smaller as well.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days VR has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with uncertain performance in the last few months, the Etf's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in June 2024. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the ETF retail investors. ...more
VR |
VR Relative Risk vs. Return Landscape
If you would invest 2,554 in VR on February 2, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2,554) from holding VR or give up 100.0% of portfolio value over 90 days. VR is generating negative expected returns and assumes 26.732% volatility on return distribution over the 90 days horizon. Put differently, most traded equities are less volatile than VR, and majority of equities are expected to be superior in generating returns on investments over the next 90 days. Expected Return |
| Risk |
VR Market Risk Analysis
Today, many novice investors tend to focus exclusively on investment returns with little concern for VR's investment risk. Standard deviation is the most common way to measure market volatility of etfs, such as VR, and traders can use it to determine the average amount a VR's price has deviated from the expected return over a period of time. It is calculated by determining the expected price for the established period and then subtracting this figure from each price point. The differences are then squared, summed, and averaged to produce the variance.
Sharpe Ratio = -0.2665
| Best Portfolio | Best Equity | |||
| Good Returns | ||||
| Average Returns | ||||
| Small Returns | ||||
| Cash | Small Risk | Average Risk | High Risk | Huge Risk |
| Negative Returns | VR |
Estimated Market Risk
| 26.73 actual daily | 96 96% of assets are less volatile |
Expected Return
| -7.12 actual daily | 0 Most of other assets have higher returns |
Risk-Adjusted Return
| -0.27 actual daily | 0 Most of other assets perform better |
Based on monthly moving average VR is not performing at its full potential. However, if added to a well diversified portfolio the total return can be enhanced and market risk can be reduced. You can increase risk-adjusted return of VR by adding VR to a well-diversified portfolio.
VR Fundamentals Growth
VR Etf prices reflect investors' perceptions of the future prospects and financial health of VR, and VR fundamentals are critical determinants of its market performance. Overall, investors pay close attention to revenue and earnings growth, profit margins, and debt levels. These fundamentals can have a significant impact on VR Etf performance.
| Return On Equity | -8.27 | |||
| Return On Asset | -1.9 | |||
| Profit Margin | (5.05) % | |||
| Operating Margin | (14.60) % | |||
| Current Valuation | (2.5 B) | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 81.4 M | |||
| Price To Earning | 13.09 X | |||
| Price To Book | 1.54 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 1.98 X | |||
| Revenue | 2.83 B | |||
| EBITDA | (412.71 M) | |||
| Cash And Equivalents | 10.14 B | |||
| Cash Per Share | 127.88 X | |||
| Total Debt | 2.27 B | |||
| Debt To Equity | 40.00 % | |||
| Book Value Per Share | 44.14 X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | (2.13 B) | |||
| Earnings Per Share | (2.05) X | |||
| Total Asset | 1.82 M | |||
| Retained Earnings | 2.63 B | |||
| Current Asset | 10.21 B | |||
| Current Liabilities | 1.92 B | |||
About VR Performance
To evaluate VR Etf as a possible investment, you need to clearly understand its upside potential, downside risk, and overall future performance outlook. You may be satisfied when VR generates a 15% return over the last few months, but what if the market is generating 25% over the same period? In this case, it makes sense to compare VR Etf's performance with different market indexes, such as the Dow or NASDAQ Composite. These indexes can act as benchmarks that will help you to understand VR market performance in a much more refined way. The Macroaxis performance score is an integer between 0 and 100 that represents VR's market performance from a risk-adjusted return perspective. Generally speaking, the higher the score, the better is overall performance as compared to other investors. The score is normalized against the average investing universe (the best we can interpret from the data available). Within this methodology, scores of individual equity instruments will always be inferior to the scores of portfolios of equities as portfolios typically diversify a lot of unsystematic risks away. The formula to derive the Macroaxis score bases on multiple unequally-weighted factors. For more information, refer to our portfolio performance evaluation section.
Please also refer to our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.The fund invests at least 80 percent of its net assets, plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes, in the securities of the index and in American Depositary Receipts and Global Depositary Receipts based on the securities in the index. Gx Metaverse is traded on NASDAQ Exchange in the United States.| VR is not yet fully synchronised with the market data | |
| VR generated a negative expected return over the last 90 days | |
| VR has high historical volatility and very poor performance | |
| VR has some characteristics of a very speculative penny stock | |
| The company generated the yearly revenue of 2.83 B. Annual Net Loss to common stockholders was (162.12 M) with gross profit of 33.26 M. | |
| VR reports about 10.14 B in cash with (2.13 B) of positive cash flow from operations. This results in cash-per-share (CPS) ratio of 127.88. | |
| The fund keeps 99.92% of its net assets in stocks |
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any etf could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.
The market value of VR is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of VR that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of VR's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is VR's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because VR's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect VR's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between VR's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if VR is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, VR's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.