Decisionpoint Systems Stock Beneish M Score
| DPSI Stock | USD 10.01 0.01 0.1% |
DecisionPoint | Beneish M Score |
At this time, it appears that DecisionPoint Systems is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if DecisionPoint Systems' top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by DecisionPoint Systems executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of DecisionPoint Systems' earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
-2.35
Beneish M Score - Unlikely Manipulator
DecisionPoint Systems Beneish M-Score Indicator Trends
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if DecisionPoint Systems' auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net Receivables | 25 M | 23.8 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Revenue | 121.4 M | 115.6 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Assets | 79.7 M | 75.9 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Assets | 18.1 M | 30.8 M |
|
| |||||
| Non Current Assets Total | 47.4 M | 45.1 M |
|
| |||||
| Property Plant Equipment | 5.4 M | 5.2 M |
|
| |||||
| Depreciation And Amortization | 3.1 M | 3 M |
|
| |||||
| Selling General Administrative | 14.8 M | 14.1 M |
|
| |||||
| Total Current Liabilities | 22.9 M | 38.7 M |
|
| |||||
| Non Current Liabilities Total | 18.5 M | 17.7 M |
|
| |||||
| Short Term Debt | 2.7 M | 1.9 M |
|
| |||||
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.17 | 0.2494 |
|
|
DecisionPoint Systems Beneish M-Score Driver Matrix
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between DecisionPoint Systems' different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards DecisionPoint Systems in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find DecisionPoint Systems' degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
About DecisionPoint Systems Beneish M Score
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
Total Assets |
|
DecisionPoint Systems Earnings Manipulation Drivers
Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as DecisionPoint Systems. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
| 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
| Net Receivables | 8.7M | 16.4M | 12.3M | 17.1M | 23.8M | 25.0M | |
| Total Revenue | 43.9M | 63.4M | 65.9M | 97.4M | 115.6M | 121.4M | |
| Total Assets | 31.7M | 39.4M | 35.7M | 55.6M | 75.9M | 79.7M | |
| Total Current Assets | 17.6M | 21.1M | 19.3M | 32.3M | 30.8M | 18.1M | |
| Net Debt | 1.6M | 1.2M | (2.1M) | (4.3M) | 5.6M | 2.9M | |
| Short Term Debt | 3.5M | 1.5M | 260K | 532K | 1.9M | 2.7M | |
| Operating Income | 1.9M | 4.2M | 398K | 4.4M | 4.8M | 5.0M |
About DecisionPoint Systems Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze DecisionPoint Systems's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of DecisionPoint Systems using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of DecisionPoint Systems based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards DecisionPoint Systems in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, DecisionPoint Systems' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from DecisionPoint Systems options trading.
Pair Trading with DecisionPoint Systems
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if DecisionPoint Systems position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in DecisionPoint Systems will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against DecisionPoint Stock
| 0.68 | DT | Dynatrace Holdings LLC Financial Report 15th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.66 | WK | Workiva | PairCorr |
| 0.61 | U | Unity Software Aggressive Push | PairCorr |
| 0.59 | EB | Eventbrite Class A Financial Report 14th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.57 | DV | DoubleVerify Holdings Financial Report 8th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to DecisionPoint Systems could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace DecisionPoint Systems when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back DecisionPoint Systems - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling DecisionPoint Systems to buy it.
The correlation of DecisionPoint Systems is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as DecisionPoint Systems moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if DecisionPoint Systems moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for DecisionPoint Systems can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out DecisionPoint Systems Piotroski F Score and DecisionPoint Systems Altman Z Score analysis. For more detail on how to invest in DecisionPoint Stock please use our How to Invest in DecisionPoint Systems guide.You can also try the Transaction History module to view history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance.
Complementary Tools for DecisionPoint Stock analysis
When running DecisionPoint Systems' price analysis, check to measure DecisionPoint Systems' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy DecisionPoint Systems is operating at the current time. Most of DecisionPoint Systems' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of DecisionPoint Systems' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move DecisionPoint Systems' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of DecisionPoint Systems to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
| Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
| FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
| Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
| Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
| Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital |
Is DecisionPoint Systems' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of DecisionPoint Systems. If investors know DecisionPoint will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about DecisionPoint Systems listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.13) | Earnings Share 0.32 | Revenue Per Share 15.3 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.246 | Return On Assets 0.0454 |
The market value of DecisionPoint Systems is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of DecisionPoint that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of DecisionPoint Systems' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is DecisionPoint Systems' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because DecisionPoint Systems' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect DecisionPoint Systems' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between DecisionPoint Systems' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if DecisionPoint Systems is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, DecisionPoint Systems' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.