Correlation Between PING and UPP

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PING and UPP at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PING and UPP into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between PING and UPP, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PING and UPP and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PING with a short position of UPP. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PING and UPP.

Diversification Opportunities for PING and UPP

0.0

Correlation Coefficient

PING  UPP

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between PING and UPP is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PING and UPP in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on UPP and PING is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PING are associated (or correlated) with UPP. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of UPP has no effect on the direction of PING i.e., PING and UPP go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between PING and UPP

If you would invest  16.00  in PING on January 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding PING or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Flat
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	4.76%
Values	Daily Returns

PING  vs.  UPP

PING

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days PING has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, PING is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

UPP

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in UPP are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather weak basic indicators, UPP exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with PING and UPP

The main advantage of trading using opposite PING and UPP positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PING position performs unexpectedly, UPP can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in UPP will offset losses from the drop in UPP's long position.

The idea behind PING and UPP pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.