Correlation Between Citigroup and VeriSign

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and VeriSign at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and VeriSign into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and VeriSign, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and VeriSign and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of VeriSign. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and VeriSign.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and VeriSign

-0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and VeriSign is -0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and VeriSign in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on VeriSign and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with VeriSign. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of VeriSign has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and VeriSign go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and VeriSign

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 1.22 times more return on investment than VeriSign. However, Citigroup is 1.22 times more volatile than VeriSign. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. VeriSign is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,399  in Citigroup on February 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,755  from holding Citigroup or generate 39.9% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  VeriSign

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
VeriSign 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days VeriSign has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in June 2024. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.

Citigroup and VeriSign Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and VeriSign

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and VeriSign positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, VeriSign can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in VeriSign will offset losses from the drop in VeriSign's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and VeriSign pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm