Megan Liberman - Lee Enterprises Independent Director
| LEE Stock | USD 12.74 0.14 1.11% |
Director
Ms. Megan Liberman is an Independent Director of the Company. She is currently Senior Vice President, News, Talk Entertainment at SiriusXM, where she is responsible for content and strategic direction of the talk portfolio, overseeing 60 original and partner channels and managing a staff of approximately 350. Previously, she was Vice President and Editor in Chief of the Yahoo News Group from 2013 to 2017 and spent 13 years at The New York Times, most recently as Deputy News Editor for Digital Development from 2010 to 2013. since 2019.
| Age | 50 |
| Tenure | 5 years |
| Address | 4600 E 53rd Street, Davenport, IA, United States, 52807 |
| Phone | 563 383 2100 |
| Web | https://lee.net |
Lee Enterprises Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0483 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0483 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of (0.1637) %, meaning that it generated no profit with money invested by stockholders. Lee Enterprises' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Lee Enterprises manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At present, Lee Enterprises' Return On Capital Employed is projected to slightly decrease based on the last few years of reporting. At present, Lee Enterprises' Non Current Assets Total are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Other Current Assets is expected to grow to about 15.7 M, whereas Total Current Assets are forecasted to decline to about 95.6 M.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| James Barge | Scholastic | 62 | |
| Debra Sandler | Gannett Co | 60 | |
| Rebecca Dyck | New York Times | 51 | |
| John Cody | Gannett Co | 71 | |
| Steven Green | New York Times | 52 | |
| Dara Khosrowshahi | New York Times | 46 | |
| Ellen Marram | New York Times | 68 | |
| Margaret Williams | Scholastic | 62 | |
| Doreen Toben | New York Times | 71 | |
| Sherry Coutu | Pearson PLC ADR | 57 | |
| Donald Felsinger | Gannett Co | 70 | |
| Chloe Sladden | Gannett Co | 43 | |
| Brian McAndrews | New York Times | 62 | |
| Michael Lynton | Pearson PLC ADR | 61 | |
| Amanpal Bhutani | New York Times | 44 | |
| Joshua Lewis | Pearson PLC ADR | 53 | |
| Raul Cesan | New York Times | 70 | |
| John Rogers | New York Times | 62 | |
| Manuel Bronstein | New York Times | 45 | |
| Graeme Pitkethly | Pearson PLC ADR | 54 | |
| Josh Lewis | Pearson PLC ADR | 56 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | -0.16 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0483 |
Lee Enterprises rporated Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Lee Enterprises' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Lee Enterprises inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Lee. The board's role is to monitor Lee Enterprises' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Lee Enterprises' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Lee Enterprises' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Leonard Elmore, Independent Director | ||
| Paul Farrell, Vice President of Sales | ||
| Josh Rinehults, VP FPA | ||
| Robert Fleck, Vice President - Business Development | ||
| Kevin Mowbray, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| John Humenik, Vice President - News | ||
| Michael Gulledge, VP of Advter. Sales Leadership | ||
| Sam Worthington, Pres Roanoke | ||
| Margaret Liberman, Independent Director | ||
| Charles Arms, Corporate Manager | ||
| Timothy Millage, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Treasurer | ||
| Nathan Bekke, Vice President of Consumer Sales & Marketing | ||
| Douglas Ranes, Vice President - Production Operations | ||
| Herbert Moloney, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Megan Liberman, Independent Director | ||
| David Pearson, Independent Director | ||
| Ronald Mayo, CFO, VP and Treasurer | ||
| Suzanna Frank, Vice President of Audience | ||
| Richard Cole, Independent Director | ||
| Gregory Schermer, Vice President - Strategy, Director | ||
| Mary Junck, Chairman, CEO and President and Chairman of Executive Committee | ||
| Steven Fletcher, Independent Director | ||
| James Green, Vice President of Digital | ||
| Mark Vittert, Independent Director | ||
| Brent Magid, Independent Director | ||
| Deborah Anselm, Vice President - Publishing | ||
| Michele White, Vice President of Information Technology, Chief Information Officer | ||
| Nancy Donovan, Independent Director | ||
| Astrid Garcia, Vice President - Human Resources and Legal | ||
| Ray Farris, Vice President - Group Publisher | ||
| Jamie Seratt, Co Controller | ||
| Cynthia Herndon, Controller, Finance | ||
| Andrew Newman, Independent Director | ||
| Joshua Trust, President Group | ||
| William Mayer, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Eric Mayberry, President Region | ||
| Joseph Battistoni, Vice President - Local Advertising |
Lee Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Lee Enterprises a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | -0.16 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0483 | ||||
| Profit Margin | (0.01) % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.08 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 560.73 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 6.14 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 27.99 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 44.27 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 187.5 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 11.04 X |
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Lee Enterprises in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Lee Enterprises' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Lee Enterprises options trading.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Lee Enterprises Incorporated. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in income. Note that the Lee Enterprises rporated information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Lee Enterprises' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Rebalancing module to analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets.
Complementary Tools for Lee Stock analysis
When running Lee Enterprises' price analysis, check to measure Lee Enterprises' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Lee Enterprises is operating at the current time. Most of Lee Enterprises' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Lee Enterprises' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Lee Enterprises' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Lee Enterprises to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
| Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
| Sync Your Broker Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors. | |
| Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. |
Is Lee Enterprises' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Lee Enterprises. If investors know Lee will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Lee Enterprises listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.38) | Earnings Share (0.97) | Revenue Per Share 112.374 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.16) | Return On Assets 0.0483 |
The market value of Lee Enterprises rporated is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Lee that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Lee Enterprises' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Lee Enterprises' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Lee Enterprises' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Lee Enterprises' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Lee Enterprises' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Lee Enterprises is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Lee Enterprises' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.