Joseph Schottenstein - Designer Brands Director
| DBI Stock | USD 9.41 0.22 2.39% |
Director
Mr. Joseph A. Schottenstein is Director of the Company. Mr. Schottenstein is a director, Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President of Acquisitions and Leasing at Schottenstein Property Group and Schottenstein Realty, LLC. Mr. Schottenstein has held various positions with the Schottenstein family of companies and currently holds a position on the board of directors and as an Executive Vice President in Schottenstein Stores Corporationrationration. In addition, he holds a position on the board of directors of American Signature, Inc. Mr. Schottenstein assisted with special acquisitions for SPG from 2003 to 2006, served in the property management group of SPG from 2006 to 2008 and served as the Vice President of Leasing at SPG from 2008 through 2010. From June 2004 until joining SPG in 2006, Mr. Schottenstein served as the CoManager of Indigo Nation, LLC, a specialty denim retailer. Mr. Schottenstein brings an expertise in real estate development to our Board. since 2012.
| Age | 40 |
| Tenure | 12 years |
| Address | 810 DSW Drive, Columbus, OH, United States, 43219 |
| Phone | 614 237 7100 |
| Web | https://www.designerbrands.com |
Designer Brands Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0208 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0208 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0732 %, implying that it generated $0.0732 on every 100 dollars invested. Designer Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Designer Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. The Designer Brands' current Return On Tangible Assets is estimated to increase to 0.11. The Designer Brands' current Return On Capital Employed is estimated to increase to 0.21. As of now, Designer Brands' Return On Tangible Assets are decreasing as compared to previous years. The Designer Brands' current Fixed Asset Turnover is estimated to increase to 7.39, while Total Assets are projected to decrease to under 1.3 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Thomas Saunders | Hibbett Sports | 77 | |
| Lorna Nagler | Hibbett Sports | 61 | |
| Robert Bensoussan | Lululemon Athletica | 58 | |
| Tricia Patrick | Lululemon Athletica | 36 | |
| Emily White | Lululemon Athletica | 39 | |
| Albert Johnson | Hibbett Sports | 69 | |
| RoAnn Costin | Lululemon Athletica | 61 | |
| Jane Aggers | Hibbett Sports | 69 | |
| Anthony Crudele | Hibbett Sports | 60 | |
| William Glenn | Lululemon Athletica | 57 | |
| Carl Kirkland | Hibbett Sports | 73 | |
| Dorlisa Flur | Hibbett Sports | N/A | |
| James Hilt | Hibbett Sports | 42 | |
| Ralph Parks | Hibbett Sports | 71 | |
| Jon McNeill | Lululemon Athletica | 49 | |
| Terrance Finley | Hibbett Sports | 63 | |
| Rhoda Pitcher | Lululemon Athletica | 60 | |
| Karen Etzkorn | Hibbett Sports | 53 | |
| Alton Yother | Hibbett Sports | 64 | |
| Martha Morfitt | Lululemon Athletica | 60 | |
| Kathryn Henry | Lululemon Athletica | 51 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0732 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0208 |
Designer Brands Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Designer Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Designer Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Designer. The board's role is to monitor Designer Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Designer Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Designer Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Mary Turner, Executive Vice President and Presidentident of Designer Brands Canada Inc | ||
| Joseph Schottenstein, Director | ||
| Andrea ODonnell, Executive Brands | ||
| Drew Domecq, Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer | ||
| Margaret Standing, Director Communications | ||
| Allan Tanenbaum, Independent Director | ||
| Jay Schottenstein, Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
| Michele Love, Chief Operating Officer - Designer Shoe Warehouse, Executive Vice President | ||
| Elaine Eisenman, Independent Director | ||
| Carolee Lee, Independent Director | ||
| Joanne Zaiac, Independent Director | ||
| Roger Rawlins, Chief Executive Officer, Director, Interim President - DSW | ||
| Joanna Lau, Independent Director | ||
| Douglas Howe, CEO Director | ||
| Ekta SinghBushell, Independent Director | ||
| Simon Nankervis, Executive Vice President and President, CEO and Chief Commercial Officer of Camuto LLC d/b/a/ Camuto Group | ||
| Deborah Ferre, Vice Chairman | ||
| Mark Haley, Senior Controller | ||
| Christina Cheng, IR Contact Officer | ||
| Jared Poff, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Deborah Ferree, Vice Chairman of the Board, President of the Camuto Group | ||
| William Jordan, Executive Vice President Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Secretary | ||
| Harvey Sonnenberg, Independent Director | ||
| Michelle Krall, General VP | ||
| James Weinberg, Ex Officer | ||
| Laura Denk, Executive President | ||
| Peter Cobb, Independent Director |
Designer Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Designer Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0732 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0208 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.01 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | (0.06) % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 1.72 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 49.51 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 18.04 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 81.96 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 11.29 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 7.22 X |
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Designer Brands in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Designer Brands' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Designer Brands options trading.
Pair Trading with Designer Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Designer Stock
| 0.79 | HD | Home Depot Financial Report 21st of May 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.63 | VIPS | Vipshop Holdings Buyout Trend | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Designer Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Designer Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Designer Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Designer Brands to buy it.
The correlation of Designer Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Designer Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Designer Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Designer Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Designer Brands. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in bureau of labor statistics. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.Note that the Designer Brands information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Designer Brands' statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.
Complementary Tools for Designer Stock analysis
When running Designer Brands' price analysis, check to measure Designer Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Designer Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Designer Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Designer Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Designer Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Designer Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
| Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
| Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
| Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
| FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
| Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
| Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
| Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas |
Is Designer Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. If investors know Designer will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.74) | Dividend Share 0.2 | Earnings Share 0.46 | Revenue Per Share 50.166 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.01) |
The market value of Designer Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Designer that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Designer Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Designer Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Designer Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Designer Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.