Tupperware Brands Current Debt

TUP Stock  USD 1.33  0.20  17.70%   
Tupperware Brands has over 705.4 Million in debt which may indicate that it relies heavily on debt financing. As of 05/05/2024, Net Debt To EBITDA is likely to grow to 6.41, while Short and Long Term Debt Total is likely to drop slightly above 621.1 M. Tupperware Brands' financial risk is the risk to Tupperware Brands stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt.

Asset vs Debt

Equity vs Debt

Tupperware Brands' liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Tupperware Brands' cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Tupperware Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Tupperware Brands' stakeholders.
For most companies, including Tupperware Brands, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for the executing running Tupperware Brands the most critical issue when dealing with liquidity needs is whether the current assets are properly aligned with its current liabilities. If not, management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure that there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet in reserve to pay for obligations.
Book Value
(11.33)
Operating Margin
0.0216
Profit Margin
(0.32)
Return On Assets
0.0366
As of 05/05/2024, Net Debt To EBITDA is likely to grow to 6.41, while Short and Long Term Debt Total is likely to drop slightly above 621.1 M.
  
Check out the analysis of Tupperware Brands Fundamentals Over Time.
To learn how to invest in Tupperware Stock, please use our How to Invest in Tupperware Brands guide.

Tupperware Brands Financial Leverage Rating

Tupperware Brands bond ratings play a critical role in determining how much Tupperware Brands have to pay to access credit markets, i.e., the amount of interest on their issued debt. The threshold between investment-grade and speculative-grade ratings has important market implications for Tupperware Brands' borrowing costs.
Piotroski F Score
2  Frail
Beneish M Score

Tupperware Brands Debt to Cash Allocation

As Tupperware Brands follows its natural business cycle, the capital allocation decisions will not magically go away. Tupperware Brands' decision-makers have to determine if most of the cash flows will be poured back into or reinvested in the business, reserved for other projects beyond operational needs, or paid back to stakeholders and investors. Many companies eventually find out that there is only so much market out there to be conquered, and adding the next product or service is only half as profitable per unit as their current endeavors. Eventually, the company will reach a point where cash flows are strong, and extra cash is available but not fully utilized. In this case, the company may start buying back its stock from the public or issue more dividends.
The company has 705.4 M in debt with debt to equity (D/E) ratio of 337.5, demonstrating that the company may be unable to create cash to meet all of its financial commitments. Tupperware Brands has a current ratio of 1.3, demonstrating that it may have difficulties to pay its financial commitments when the payables are due. Debt can assist Tupperware Brands until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Tupperware Brands' shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Tupperware Brands sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Tupperware to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Tupperware Brands' use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Tupperware Brands Total Assets Over Time

Tupperware Brands Assets Financed by Debt

Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Tupperware Brands' operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Tupperware Brands, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility. Like all other financial ratios, a a Tupperware Brands debt ratio should be compared their industry average or other competing firms.

Tupperware Short Long Term Debt Total

Short Long Term Debt Total

621.06 Million

At this time, Tupperware Brands' Short and Long Term Debt Total is relatively stable compared to the past year.

Understaning Tupperware Brands Use of Financial Leverage

Tupperware Brands financial leverage ratio helps in determining the effect of debt on the overall profitability of the company. It measures Tupperware Brands's total debt position, including all of outstanding debt obligations, and compares it with the equity. In simple terms, the high financial leverage means the cost of production, together with running the business day-to-day, is high, whereas, lower financial leverage implies lower fixed cost investment in the business and generally considered by investors to be a good sign. So if creditors own a majority of Tupperware Brands assets, the company is considered highly leveraged. Understanding the composition and structure of overall Tupperware Brands debt and outstanding corporate bonds gives a good idea of how risky the capital structure of a business and if it is worth investing in it. Financial leverage can amplify the potential profits to Tupperware Brands' owners, but it also increases the potential losses and risk of financial distress, including bankruptcy, if the firm cannot cover its debt costs. The degree of Tupperware Brands' financial leverage can be measured in several ways, including by ratios such as the debt-to-equity ratio (total debt / total equity), equity multiplier (total assets / total equity), or the debt ratio (total debt / total assets).
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Short and Long Term Debt Total811.2 M621.1 M
Net Debt684.6 M507.4 M
Short Term Debt20.7 M19.7 M
Long Term Debt790.5 M553.4 M
Long Term Debt Total790.5 M606.1 M
Short and Long Term Debt16.2 M15.4 M
Net Debt To EBITDA 6.11  6.41 
Debt To Equity(4.33)(4.11)
Interest Debt Per Share 14.55  8.69 
Debt To Assets 0.67  0.34 
Long Term Debt To Capitalization 1.24  0.73 
Total Debt To Capitalization 1.23  0.62 
Debt Equity Ratio(4.33)(4.11)
Debt Ratio 0.67  0.34 
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio(0.09)(0.08)
Please read more on our technical analysis page.

Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis

When determining whether Tupperware Brands is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Tupperware Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Tupperware Brands Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Tupperware Brands Stock:
Check out the analysis of Tupperware Brands Fundamentals Over Time.
To learn how to invest in Tupperware Stock, please use our How to Invest in Tupperware Brands guide.
You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.

Complementary Tools for Tupperware Stock analysis

When running Tupperware Brands' price analysis, check to measure Tupperware Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Tupperware Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Tupperware Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Tupperware Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Tupperware Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Tupperware Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Is Tupperware Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Tupperware Brands. If investors know Tupperware will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Tupperware Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.14
Earnings Share
(8.07)
Revenue Per Share
25.166
Quarterly Revenue Growth
(0.14)
Return On Assets
0.0366
The market value of Tupperware Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Tupperware that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Tupperware Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Tupperware Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Tupperware Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Tupperware Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Tupperware Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Tupperware Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Tupperware Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

What is Financial Leverage?

Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.

Leverage and Capital Costs

The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.

Benefits of Financial Leverage

Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:
  • Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
  • It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
  • Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.
By borrowing funds, the firm incurs a debt that must be paid. But, this debt is paid in small installments over a relatively long period of time. This frees funds for more immediate use in the stock market. For example, suppose a company can afford a new factory but will be left with negligible free cash. In that case, it may be better to finance the factory and spend the cash on hand on inputs, labor, or even hold a significant portion as a reserve against unforeseen circumstances.

The Risk of Financial Leverage

The most obvious and apparent risk of leverage is that if price changes unexpectedly, the leveraged position can lead to severe losses. For example, imagine a hedge fund seeded by $50 worth of investor money. The hedge fund borrows another $50 and buys an asset worth $100, leading to a leverage ratio of 2:1. For the investor, this is neither good nor bad -- until the asset price changes. If the asset price goes up 10 percent, the investor earns $10 on $50 of capital, a net gain of 20 percent, and is very pleased with the increased gains from the leverage. However, if the asset price crashes unexpectedly, say by 30 percent, the investor loses $30 on $50 of capital, suffering a 60 percent loss. In other words, the effect of leverage is to increase the volatility of returns and increase the effects of a price change on the asset to the bottom line while increasing the chance for profit as well.