Ingersoll Rand Company Insiders
IR Stock | USD 93.50 1.47 1.60% |
Ingersoll Rand's insiders are aggressively selling. The analysis of insiders' sentiment of trading Ingersoll Rand stock suggests that virtually all insiders are panicking at this time. Ingersoll Rand employs about 18 K people. The company is managed by 58 executives with a total tenure of roughly 420 years, averaging almost 7.0 years of service per executive, having 310.34 employees per reported executive.
Michael Lamach Chairman Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer |
Gary Michel President Senior Vice President and President - Residential HVAC |
Ingersoll Rand's Insider Buying Vs Selling
0
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-03-11 | Andrew R Schiesl | Disposed 35000 @ 89.46 | View | ||
2024-02-28 | Vicente Reynal | Disposed 240000 @ 90.16 | View | ||
2024-02-22 | Andrew R Schiesl | Disposed 10421 @ 89.95 | View | ||
2024-02-21 | Michael J Scheske | Disposed 7590 @ 88 | View | ||
2023-12-05 | Andrew R Schiesl | Disposed 13000 @ 71.89 | View | ||
2023-11-03 | Andrew R Schiesl | Disposed 9532 @ 66.22 | View | ||
2023-09-20 | Sheldon Whitehouse | Disposed @ 65.02 | |||
2023-09-06 | Vikram Kini | Disposed 169153 @ 69.43 | View | ||
2023-06-21 | Daniel S. Goldman | Disposed @ 64.13 | |||
2023-06-16 | Vicente Reynal | Disposed 27169 @ 65 | View | ||
2023-06-08 | Kathleen M Keene | Disposed 4003 @ 62.5 | View | ||
2023-06-05 | Gary E Gillespie | Disposed 27487 @ 60.73 | View |
Monitoring Ingersoll Rand's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Ingersoll |
Ingersoll Rand's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Ingersoll Rand's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Ingersoll will maintain a workforce of slightly above 18000 employees by May 2024.Ingersoll Rand's latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like Ingersoll Rand, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Ingersoll Rand by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2023-09-20 | Senator Sheldon Whitehouse | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2023-06-21 | Representative Daniel Goldman | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2021-05-11 | Representative Bob Gibbs | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-11-19 | Representative Kenny Marchant | Acquired $15K to $50K | Verify | ||
2020-07-22 | Representative Gilbert Cisneros | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-03-05 | Representative Lois Frankel | Disposed Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-03-02 | Representative Dean Phillips | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2020-02-29 | Senator Jacky Rosen | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2019-06-03 | Senator Mitch McConnell | Acquired $250K to $500K | Verify |
Ingersoll Rand Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.0512 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.0512. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.0822 %, which means that it produced $0.0822 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. Ingersoll Rand's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Ingersoll Rand manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Ingersoll Rand's Return On Tangible Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 04/26/2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.05, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.07. At this time, Ingersoll Rand's Other Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 04/26/2024, Other Current Assets is likely to grow to about 280.5 M, while Intangible Assets are likely to drop slightly above 3.4 B.As of 04/26/2024, Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to grow to about 2.1 B, while Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop slightly above 294.7 M.
Ingersoll Rand Workforce Comparison
Ingersoll Rand is rated second overall in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Industrials industry is currently estimated at about 45,900. Ingersoll Rand totals roughly 18,000 in number of employees claiming about 39% of equities under Industrials industry.
Ingersoll Rand Profit Margins
The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 0.11 %, which suggests that even a small decline in it sales will erase profits and may result in a net loss, or a negative profit margin. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 0.2 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of $0.2.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.3 | 0.3657 |
|
|
Ingersoll Rand Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Ingersoll Rand insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Ingersoll Rand's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Ingersoll Rand insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-03-01 | 1.0 | 75 | 75 | 1,062,099 | 836,298 |
2023-12-01 | 1.3333 | 4 | 3 | 6,375 | 22,532 |
2023-09-01 | 0.4118 | 7 | 17 | 185,887 | 376,844 |
2023-06-01 | 0.5 | 5 | 10 | 59,699 | 146,444 |
2023-03-01 | 0.8764 | 78 | 89 | 877,275 | 499,144 |
2022-12-01 | 0.3333 | 2 | 6 | 1,746 | 48,149 |
2022-09-01 | 0.4444 | 4 | 9 | 6,005 | 30,144 |
2022-06-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 2,365 | 5,153 |
2022-03-01 | 0.8283 | 82 | 99 | 602,022 | 354,074 |
2021-12-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 11,974 | 28,303 |
2021-09-01 | 0.9 | 9 | 10 | 176,924 | 264,114 |
2021-06-01 | 0.3125 | 5 | 16 | 44,709 | 30,017,190 |
2021-03-01 | 0.9024 | 74 | 82 | 507,498 | 287,537 |
2020-12-01 | 0.4444 | 8 | 18 | 369,200 | 658,829 |
2020-09-01 | 0.4118 | 7 | 17 | 196,594 | 395,034 |
2020-06-01 | 0.2105 | 4 | 19 | 84,682 | 52,145,877 |
2020-03-01 | 1.7797 | 105 | 59 | 1,578,059 | 501,424 |
2019-12-01 | 0.7 | 7 | 10 | 537,338 | 830,756 |
2019-09-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 152,890 | 304,623 |
2019-06-01 | 0.5455 | 12 | 22 | 23,286 | 61,730 |
2019-03-01 | 1.4595 | 54 | 37 | 1,689,489 | 763,029 |
2018-12-01 | 0.0909 | 1 | 11 | 50,274 | 40,187,256 |
2018-09-01 | 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 44,008 | 90,745,605 |
2018-06-01 | 0.75 | 9 | 12 | 19,328 | 60,890,023 |
2018-03-01 | 1.76 | 44 | 25 | 1,485,883 | 566,464 |
2017-12-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 11,138 | 50,502,687 |
2017-06-01 | 0.2188 | 7 | 32 | 95,541 | 2,302,530 |
2017-03-01 | 0.7857 | 22 | 28 | 757,215 | 611,637 |
2016-12-01 | 0.4615 | 6 | 13 | 352,706 | 77,568 |
2016-06-01 | 0.6667 | 6 | 9 | 12,900 | 24,458 |
2016-03-01 | 1.05 | 21 | 20 | 989,108 | 364,457 |
2015-12-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 35,243 | 18,229 |
2015-06-01 | 2.0 | 6 | 3 | 12,450 | 14,038 |
2015-03-01 | 0.7188 | 23 | 32 | 935,993 | 488,810 |
2014-12-01 | 0.5 | 3 | 6 | 59,428 | 75,990 |
2014-09-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 21,380 | 46,260 |
2014-06-01 | 0.2222 | 2 | 9 | 92,300 | 270,132 |
2014-03-01 | 0.9268 | 38 | 41 | 663,386 | 431,669 |
2013-12-01 | 0.7368 | 28 | 38 | 1,348,593 | 2,659,345 |
2013-09-01 | 1.0513 | 41 | 39 | 1,399,960 | 2,659,364 |
2013-06-01 | 2.3846 | 31 | 13 | 68,599 | 226,176 |
2013-03-01 | 0.7647 | 39 | 51 | 629,836 | 396,991 |
2012-12-01 | 8.0 | 16 | 2 | 26,177 | 50,592 |
2012-09-01 | 9.0 | 36 | 4 | 32,789 | 55,280 |
2012-06-01 | 6.6 | 33 | 5 | 16,452 | 50,731 |
2012-03-01 | 2.3333 | 42 | 18 | 269,875 | 28,779 |
2011-09-01 | 2.1111 | 19 | 9 | 3,681 | 25,137 |
2011-06-01 | 0.7143 | 10 | 14 | 45,941 | 74,896 |
2011-03-01 | 1.1875 | 19 | 16 | 364,370 | 63,288 |
2010-12-01 | 1.6667 | 5 | 3 | 20,328 | 8,098 |
2010-09-01 | 0.1111 | 2 | 18 | 7,201 | 118,695 |
2010-06-01 | 1.25 | 5 | 4 | 67,270 | 123,188 |
2010-03-01 | 1.3684 | 26 | 19 | 1,280,796 | 170,836 |
2009-12-01 | 0.3889 | 7 | 18 | 211,554 | 621,503 |
2009-09-01 | 0.8824 | 15 | 17 | 80,117 | 238,440 |
2009-03-01 | 6.8 | 34 | 5 | 1,612,312 | 41,829 |
2008-09-01 | 2.0 | 16 | 8 | 11,394 | 191,624 |
2008-06-01 | 1.6154 | 21 | 13 | 130,986 | 72,641 |
2008-03-01 | 14.0 | 28 | 2 | 779,964 | 21,780 |
2007-06-01 | 3.75 | 15 | 4 | 63,708 | 175,084 |
2007-03-01 | 5.5 | 22 | 4 | 407,718 | 18,000 |
2006-12-01 | 7.0 | 14 | 2 | 11,372 | 9,000 |
2006-03-01 | 7.0 | 21 | 3 | 433,394 | 13,500 |
2005-12-01 | 3.3333 | 10 | 3 | 31,757 | 16,000 |
2005-03-01 | 2.2857 | 16 | 7 | 382,009 | 91,666 |
2004-12-01 | 1.6667 | 15 | 9 | 36,318 | 65,000 |
2004-09-01 | 6.5 | 13 | 2 | 21,608 | 4,500 |
2004-06-01 | 3.25 | 13 | 4 | 21,082 | 32,500 |
2004-03-01 | 5.0 | 15 | 3 | 284,009 | 37,000 |
2003-12-01 | 5.5 | 11 | 2 | 17,790 | 26,000 |
2003-09-01 | 2.0 | 14 | 7 | 37,430 | 75,126 |
Ingersoll Rand Notable Stakeholders
An Ingersoll Rand stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Ingersoll Rand often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Ingersoll Rand's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Ingersoll Rand's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Michael Lamach | Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
Vicente Reynal | Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | Profile | |
Vikram Kini | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Gary Michel | Senior Vice President and President - Residential HVAC | Profile | |
Donald Simmons | President - Commercial HVAC North America and EMEA | Profile | |
David Regnery | President, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Andrew Schiesl | Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer, General Counsel, Secretary | Profile | |
Richard Daudelin | Vice President Treasurer | Profile | |
Emily Weaver | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Keith Sultana | Senior Vice President - Global Operations and Integrated Supply Chain | Profile | |
Francesco Incalza | Vice President of Treasury | Profile | |
Michael Weatherred | Senior Vice President - IR Execution Excellence (IRX), Strategy & Business Development | Profile | |
Evan Turtz | Senior Vice President General Counsel | Profile | |
Todd Wyman | Senior Vice President - Global Operations and Integrated Supply Chain | Profile | |
Susan Carter | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Paul Camuti | Senior Vice President - Innovation, Chief Technology Officer | Profile | |
Maria Green | Senior Vice President General Counsel | Profile | |
Christopher Kuehn | Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer | Profile | |
Didier Teirlinck | Executive VP of Climate Segment | Profile | |
Robert Zafari | Executive VP of Industrial Segment | Profile | |
Marcia Avedon | Sr. VP of HR, Communications and Corporate Affairs and Member of Advisory Council | Profile | |
John Bruton | Independent Director | Profile | |
Constance Horner | Independent Director | Profile | |
Kirk Arnold | Independent Director | Profile | |
Karen Peetz | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Surma | Independent Director | Profile | |
Elaine Chao | Independent Director - Nominee | Profile | |
Richard Swift | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Jared Cohon | Independent Director | Profile | |
Tony White | Independent Director | Profile | |
Linda Hudson | Independent Director - Nominee | Profile | |
Ann Berzin | Independent Director | Profile | |
Myles Lee | Independent Director | Profile | |
Gary Forsee | Independent Director | Profile | |
Heather Howlett | Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President | Profile | |
Peter Stavros | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Kathryn Freytag | VP Officer | Profile | |
Kate Keene | Senior Vice President of Human Resources, Talent, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion | Profile | |
Michael Scheske | VP Officer | Profile | |
Joshua Weisenbeck | Independent Director | Profile | |
Mark Wagner | Vice President General Manager of the Specialty Vehicle Technologies Business Unit | Profile | |
Marc Jones | Independent Director | Profile | |
William Donnelly | Independent Director | Profile | |
Arnold Li | AsiaPacific, Services | Profile | |
Gary Gillespie | Vice President General Manager for Industrial Americas of Gardner Denver | Profile | |
Chris Miorin | Vice President of Investor Relations | Profile | |
Sia Abbaszadeh | Senior Vice President of strategy and Technology | Profile | |
Matthew Emmerich | Senior Officer | Profile | |
Enrique Viseras | Vice President General Manager, Industrials Segment EMEA | Profile | |
James Mundy | Ex Officer | Profile | |
Kimberly Rubottom | Vice President - Human Resources | Profile | |
Elizabeth Centoni | Independent Director | Profile | |
Elizabeth Hepding | Senior Vice President - Business Development | Profile | |
Kristen ActisGrande | Vice President of Investor Relations and Financial Planning and Analysis | Profile | |
Craig Mundy | Senior Vice President of Human Resources | Profile | |
John Humphrey | Independent Director | Profile | |
Nicholas KendallJones | Vice President General Manager of the Precision and Science Technologies Business Unit | Profile | |
Kathleen Keene | Talent, Resources | Profile |
About Ingersoll Rand Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Ingersoll Rand often depends on how effective the management is. Ingersoll Rand management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Ingersoll management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Ingersoll management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.15 | 0.15 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.08 | 0.07 | |
Return On Assets | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
Return On Equity | 0.08 | 0.08 |
The data published in Ingersoll Rand's official financial statements usually reflect Ingersoll Rand's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Ingersoll Rand. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Ingersoll accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Ingersoll Rand's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Machinery space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Ingersoll Rand's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Ingersoll Rand's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Ingersoll Rand's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Ingersoll Rand. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Ingersoll Rand's management manipulating its earnings.
Ingersoll Rand Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Ingersoll Rand use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Ingersoll Rand within its industry.Ingersoll Rand Manpower Efficiency
Return on Ingersoll Rand Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 382K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 118.6M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 43.3K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 13.4M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 123.5K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 38.3M |
Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Ingersoll Rand. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in metropolitan statistical area. To learn how to invest in Ingersoll Stock, please use our How to Invest in Ingersoll Rand guide.You can also try the Funds Screener module to find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges.
Complementary Tools for Ingersoll Stock analysis
When running Ingersoll Rand's price analysis, check to measure Ingersoll Rand's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Ingersoll Rand is operating at the current time. Most of Ingersoll Rand's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Ingersoll Rand's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Ingersoll Rand's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Ingersoll Rand to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges |
Is Ingersoll Rand's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Ingersoll Rand. If investors know Ingersoll will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Ingersoll Rand listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.046 | Dividend Share 0.08 | Earnings Share 1.9 | Revenue Per Share 16.986 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.122 |
The market value of Ingersoll Rand is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Ingersoll that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Ingersoll Rand's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Ingersoll Rand's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Ingersoll Rand's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Ingersoll Rand's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Ingersoll Rand's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Ingersoll Rand is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Ingersoll Rand's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.