Correlation Between Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Financial Services Portfolio and Moderately Aggressive Balanced, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Financial Services with a short position of Moderately Aggressive. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive.
Diversification Opportunities for Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive
0.98 | Correlation Coefficient |
Almost no diversification
The 3 months correlation between Financial and Moderately is 0.98. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Financial Services Portfolio and Moderately Aggressive Balanced in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Moderately Aggressive and Financial Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Financial Services Portfolio are associated (or correlated) with Moderately Aggressive. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Moderately Aggressive has no effect on the direction of Financial Services i.e., Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive
Assuming the 90 days horizon Financial Services Portfolio is expected to generate 1.71 times more return on investment than Moderately Aggressive. However, Financial Services is 1.71 times more volatile than Moderately Aggressive Balanced. It trades about 0.27 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Moderately Aggressive Balanced is currently generating about 0.38 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,082 in Financial Services Portfolio on April 20, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 184.00 from holding Financial Services Portfolio or generate 17.01% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Financial Services Portfolio vs. Moderately Aggressive Balanced
Performance |
Timeline |
Financial Services |
Moderately Aggressive |
Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive
The main advantage of trading using opposite Financial Services and Moderately Aggressive positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Financial Services position performs unexpectedly, Moderately Aggressive can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Moderately Aggressive will offset losses from the drop in Moderately Aggressive's long position.The idea behind Financial Services Portfolio and Moderately Aggressive Balanced pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Moderately Aggressive vs. Rems Real Estate | Moderately Aggressive vs. Tiaa Cref Real Estate | Moderately Aggressive vs. Tcw Global Real | Moderately Aggressive vs. Aew Real Estate |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.
Other Complementary Tools
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets |