Correlation Between Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Qs Moderate Growth and Clearbridge Aggressive Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Qs Moderate with a short position of Clearbridge Aggressive. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive.

Diversification Opportunities for Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive

1.0
  Correlation Coefficient

No risk reduction

The 3 months correlation between SCGCX and Clearbridge is 1.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Qs Moderate Growth and Clearbridge Aggressive Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Clearbridge Aggressive and Qs Moderate is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Qs Moderate Growth are associated (or correlated) with Clearbridge Aggressive. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Clearbridge Aggressive has no effect on the direction of Qs Moderate i.e., Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive

Assuming the 90 days horizon Qs Moderate is expected to generate 1.72 times less return on investment than Clearbridge Aggressive. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Qs Moderate Growth is 1.86 times less risky than Clearbridge Aggressive. It trades about 0.36 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Clearbridge Aggressive Growth is currently generating about 0.34 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,831  in Clearbridge Aggressive Growth on April 21, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  762.00  from holding Clearbridge Aggressive Growth or generate 26.92% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Qs Moderate Growth  vs.  Clearbridge Aggressive Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Qs Moderate Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Strong

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Qs Moderate Growth are ranked lower than 28 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Qs Moderate showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Clearbridge Aggressive 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Strong

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Clearbridge Aggressive Growth are ranked lower than 26 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Clearbridge Aggressive showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive

The main advantage of trading using opposite Qs Moderate and Clearbridge Aggressive positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Qs Moderate position performs unexpectedly, Clearbridge Aggressive can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Clearbridge Aggressive will offset losses from the drop in Clearbridge Aggressive's long position.
The idea behind Qs Moderate Growth and Clearbridge Aggressive Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm