Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Income Growth

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Income Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Income Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs E and Income Growth Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Income Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Income Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Income Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Income Growth

0.84

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Income Growth

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GOLDMAN and Income is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs E and Income Growth Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Income Growth and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs E are associated (or correlated) with Income Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Income Growth has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Income Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Income Growth

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs E is expected to generate 0.26 times more return on investment than Income Growth. However, Goldman Sachs E is 3.79 times less risky than Income Growth. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Income Growth Fund is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  931.00  in Goldman Sachs E on August 4, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2.00  from holding Goldman Sachs E or generate 0.21% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs E  vs.  Income Growth Fund

Goldman Sachs E

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Fair

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs E are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Income Growth

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Income Growth Fund are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Income Growth may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2025.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Income Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Income Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Income Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Income Growth will offset losses from the drop in Income Growth's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs E and Income Growth Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.