Correlation Between Salesforce and Ford

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Salesforce and Ford at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Salesforce and Ford into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Salesforce and Ford Motor, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Salesforce and Ford and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Salesforce with a short position of Ford. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Salesforce and Ford.

Diversification Opportunities for Salesforce and Ford

0.63
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Salesforce and Ford is 0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Salesforce and Ford Motor in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ford Motor and Salesforce is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Salesforce are associated (or correlated) with Ford. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ford Motor has no effect on the direction of Salesforce i.e., Salesforce and Ford go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Salesforce and Ford

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Salesforce is expected to generate 10.42 times less return on investment than Ford. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Salesforce is 1.19 times less risky than Ford. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ford Motor is currently generating about 0.23 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,200  in Ford Motor on December 29, 2023 and sell it today you would earn a total of  128.00  from holding Ford Motor or generate 10.67% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Salesforce  vs.  Ford Motor

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Salesforce 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Low
 
High
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Salesforce are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unsteady basic indicators, Salesforce displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Ford Motor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Low
 
High
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ford Motor are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Ford may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2024.

Salesforce and Ford Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Salesforce and Ford

The main advantage of trading using opposite Salesforce and Ford positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Salesforce position performs unexpectedly, Ford can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ford will offset losses from the drop in Ford's long position.
The idea behind Salesforce and Ford Motor pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk