United States Company Insiders
X Stock | USD 39.13 1.17 2.90% |
Slightly above 86 percent of United States' insiders are activelly selling. The current insiders' sentiment regarding investing in United States Steel stock implies that a very large number of insiders are panicking. United States employs about 21.8 K people. The company is managed by 56 executives with a total tenure of roughly 354 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 389.34 employees per reported executive.
David Burritt CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
Mario Longhi CEO CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee |
United States' Insider Buying Vs Selling
14
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2023-12-18 | Daniel R Brown | Disposed 5000 @ 49.77 | View | ||
2023-11-24 | Daniel R Brown | Disposed 5000 @ 35 | View | ||
2023-11-07 | Tommy Tuberville | Acquired @ 34.18 | |||
2023-10-11 | Tommy Tuberville | Disposed @ 33.53 | |||
2023-10-02 | Daniel R Brown | Disposed 4860 @ 33 | View | ||
2023-09-05 | Scott D Buckiso | Disposed 8970 @ 31.16 | View | ||
2023-08-30 | Kenneth E Jaycox | Disposed 10756 @ 30.75 | View | ||
2023-08-14 | Duane D Holloway | Disposed 23406 @ 31 | View | ||
2023-06-20 | Tommy Tuberville | Disposed @ 23.47 | |||
2023-06-14 | Tommy Tuberville | Disposed @ 23.56 | |||
2023-06-08 | Tommy Tuberville | Disposed @ 22.74 | |||
2023-05-19 | Tommy Tuberville | Disposed @ 21.82 | |||
2023-05-08 | Tommy Tuberville | Disposed @ 21.59 | |||
2023-05-03 | Alicia J Davis | Acquired 1000 @ 22.64 | View |
Monitoring United States' insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Acquired vs Disposed
Filed vs Not Filed
Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of United States' insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of United States Steel. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe United States' stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
United |
United States' Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with United States' future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that United will maintain a workforce of slightly above 22000 employees by May 2024.United States' latest congressional trading
Congressional trading in companies like United States Steel, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in United States by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2023-11-07 | Senator Thomas H Tuberville | Acquired Under $15K | Verify | ||
2023-04-24 | Senator Tommy Tuberville | Acquired $50K to $100K | Verify | ||
2023-04-10 | Representative Daniel Goldman | Disposed Under $15K | Verify |
United States Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset of 0.0314 % which means that for every 100 dollars spent on assets, it generated a profit of $0.0314. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.0835 %, implying that it made 0.0835 on every $100 invested by shareholders. United States' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well United States manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, United States' Return On Tangible Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to rise to 0.05 in 2024, despite the fact that Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to (0.02). At this time, United States' Non Currrent Assets Other are fairly stable compared to the past year. Net Tangible Assets is likely to rise to about 10.7 B in 2024, whereas Total Assets are likely to drop slightly above 11.9 B in 2024.Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to rise to about 3 B in 2024, whereas Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop slightly above 143.2 M in 2024.
United States Workforce Comparison
United States Steel is rated first in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Materials industry is at this time estimated at about 98,282. United States totals roughly 21,803 in number of employees claiming about 22% of all equities under Materials industry.
United States Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin of 0.05 %, which indicates that it operates at a low-profit margin and even a small decline in sales will erase profits resulting in a net loss, or a negative margin. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin of (0.02) %, which implies that for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated an operating loss of $0.02.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.0139 | 0.0147 |
|
|
United States Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific United States insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on United States' material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, United States insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-03-01 | 2.5238 | 53 | 21 | 742,303 | 103,971 |
2023-12-01 | 0.3103 | 9 | 29 | 497,256 | 580,101 |
2023-09-01 | 0.25 | 2 | 8 | 17,240 | 76,097 |
2023-06-01 | 4.0 | 16 | 4 | 109,781 | 40,909 |
2023-03-01 | 0.875 | 28 | 32 | 612,054 | 380,529 |
2022-12-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 7,240 | 14,480 |
2022-06-01 | 0.9286 | 13 | 14 | 71,759 | 221,999 |
2022-03-01 | 0.6415 | 34 | 53 | 763,276 | 475,356 |
2021-12-01 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 181,820 | 21,640 |
2021-09-01 | 0.1667 | 1 | 6 | 45,000 | 92,667 |
2021-06-01 | 0.4286 | 3 | 7 | 48,451 | 125,148 |
2021-03-01 | 1.5909 | 35 | 22 | 935,796 | 180,340 |
2020-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 7,004 | 0.00 |
2020-06-01 | 0.75 | 3 | 4 | 40,059 | 7,276 |
2020-03-01 | 0.8333 | 20 | 24 | 967,034 | 38,954 |
2019-09-01 | 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 3,977 | 1,107 |
2019-06-01 | 0.3333 | 5 | 15 | 10,197 | 24,970 |
2019-03-01 | 1.04 | 26 | 25 | 595,057 | 96,459 |
2018-12-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 20,000 | 12,000 |
2018-06-01 | 0.3571 | 5 | 14 | 32,800 | 48,388 |
2018-03-01 | 0.6471 | 44 | 68 | 347,653 | 288,298 |
2017-12-01 | 0.5238 | 11 | 21 | 51,938 | 97,997 |
2017-06-01 | 0.2593 | 7 | 27 | 90,510 | 84,500 |
2017-03-01 | 1.6667 | 45 | 27 | 845,102 | 414,408 |
2016-12-01 | 0.4348 | 10 | 23 | 509,596 | 1,018,367 |
2016-06-01 | 1.6667 | 30 | 18 | 683,204 | 29,116 |
2016-03-01 | 0.7333 | 11 | 15 | 210,795 | 35,302 |
2015-09-01 | 0.6667 | 2 | 3 | 8,054 | 28,533 |
2015-03-01 | 29.0 | 58 | 2 | 913,406 | 1,080 |
2014-12-01 | 1.48 | 37 | 25 | 109,658 | 115,614 |
2014-06-01 | 0.6486 | 24 | 37 | 519,490 | 50,650 |
2014-03-01 | 3.5714 | 25 | 7 | 111,461 | 4,179 |
2013-09-01 | 2.25 | 9 | 4 | 477,982 | 3,835 |
2013-06-01 | 0.7297 | 27 | 37 | 677,643 | 104,552 |
2013-03-01 | 6.5 | 13 | 2 | 48,602 | 189.85 |
2012-09-01 | 1.0 | 6 | 6 | 96,939 | 2,771 |
2012-06-01 | 0.5161 | 16 | 31 | 467,600 | 128,235 |
2012-03-01 | 10.0 | 10 | 1 | 42,328 | 10,000 |
2011-06-01 | 0.9032 | 28 | 31 | 237,900 | 75,642 |
2011-03-01 | 4.3333 | 13 | 3 | 68,358 | 105,951 |
2010-12-01 | 0.4 | 2 | 5 | 36,723 | 76,301 |
2010-09-01 | 3.0 | 12 | 4 | 42,332 | 77,939 |
2010-06-01 | 0.6757 | 25 | 37 | 322,280 | 82,111 |
2010-03-01 | 6.0 | 12 | 2 | 39,104 | 38,770 |
2009-09-01 | 0.0385 | 1 | 26 | 20,000 | 40,681 |
2009-06-01 | 0.4762 | 20 | 42 | 321,538 | 81,115 |
2008-09-01 | 1.5 | 3 | 2 | 2,565 | 1,129 |
2008-06-01 | 0.3519 | 38 | 108 | 233,059 | 223,284 |
2008-03-01 | 0.4231 | 11 | 26 | 38,635 | 67,452 |
2007-12-01 | 0.0625 | 3 | 48 | 50,000 | 101,832 |
2007-06-01 | 0.3276 | 38 | 116 | 340,927 | 349,050 |
2007-03-01 | 0.4194 | 13 | 31 | 90,733 | 163,746 |
2006-12-01 | 0.0512 | 15 | 293 | 234,751 | 445,817 |
2006-09-01 | 0.2 | 5 | 25 | 74,500 | 143,346 |
2006-06-01 | 2.1818 | 24 | 11 | 256,600 | 23,234 |
2005-09-01 | 0.5313 | 17 | 32 | 325,092 | 776,216 |
2005-06-01 | 1.3889 | 25 | 18 | 486,500 | 61,492 |
2005-03-01 | 0.5417 | 39 | 72 | 304,569 | 919,462 |
2004-12-01 | 0.2813 | 9 | 32 | 243,462 | 906,269 |
2004-09-01 | 0.2647 | 18 | 68 | 726,175 | 2,996,701 |
2004-06-01 | 1.3846 | 18 | 13 | 1,094,050 | 144,630 |
2004-03-01 | 0.3556 | 64 | 180 | 3,276,539 | 8,225,790 |
2003-12-01 | 0.3 | 3 | 10 | 117,190 | 350,733 |
United States Notable Stakeholders
An United States stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as United States often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. United States' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting United States' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
David Burritt | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
Mario Longhi | CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee | Profile | |
David Sutherland | Non-Executive Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Duane Holloway | Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
Sara Greenstein | Senior Vice President - Consumer Solutions | Profile | |
Joseph Scherrbaum | Vice President - Industrial Solutions | Profile | |
Douglas Matthews | Senior Vice President – Chief Commercial & Technology Officer, Tubular & Mining Solutions | Profile | |
Kevin Bradley | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Christine Breves | Senior Vice President - Manufacturing Support, Chief Supply Chain Officer | Profile | |
Daniel Brown | Senior Vice President - Advanced Technology Steelmaking, Chief Operating Officer of Big River Steel Works | Profile | |
David Britten | CTO, Sr. VP and President of U. S. Steel Engineering and Consultants, Inc. | Profile | |
Barry Melnkovic | Chief Human Resource Officer, Vice President | Profile | |
James Bruno | Senior Vice President - European Solutions and President, U. S. Steel Kosice | Profile | |
David Rintoul | Senior Vice President - Tubular Business | Profile | |
Scott Buckiso | Senior Vice President and Chief Manufacturing Officer North American Flat-Rolled | Profile | |
Mark Tabler | Vice President - Global Quality and Manufacturing Processing | Profile | |
Nancy Sykes | Vice President of Human Resources | Profile | |
Sara UlbrichGreenstein | Senior Vice President - Consumer Solutions | Profile | |
James Dudek | Vice President - Asset Revitalization & Manufacturing Excellence | Profile | |
Larry Brockway | Senior Vice President Chief Risk Officer, Treasurer | Profile | |
Richard Fruehauf | Senior Vice President – Strategic Planning and Chief Strategy and Development Officer | Profile | |
Pipasu Soni | Vice President – Performance analytics | Profile | |
Jessica Graziano | Senior CFO | Profile | |
Christian Gianni | Senior CTO | Profile | |
Suzanne Folsom | Chief Compliance Officer, Sr. VP of Gov.al Affairs and General Counsel | Profile | |
Michael Williams | Sr. VP of Bus. Intelligence | Profile | |
Eric Linn | DirectorofInvestor Relations | Profile | |
John Faraci | Independent Director | Profile | |
Eugene Sperling | Independent Director | Profile | |
Terry Dunlap | Independent Director | Profile | |
Stephen Girsky | Independent Director | Profile | |
Dan Dinges | Independent Director | Profile | |
Glenda McNeal | Independent Director | Profile | |
Murry Gerber | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Drosdick | Independent Director | Profile | |
Paul Mascarenas | Independent Director | Profile | |
Michael McGarry | Independent Director | Profile | |
Patricia Dennis | Independent Director | Profile | |
Patricia Tracey | Independent Director | Profile | |
John Engel | Independent Director | Profile | |
Tracy Atkinson | Independent Director | Profile | |
Robert Stevens | Director | Profile | |
Dan Lesnak | GM - Investor Relations | Profile | |
Malisa Sommers | Managing Excellence | Profile | |
Meghan Cox | Mang Communications | Profile | |
A Melnkovic | Chief Human Resource Officer, Senior Vice President | Profile | |
Steve Bugajski | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Kimberly Fast | Acting Principal Accounting Officer and Controller | Profile | |
Kenneth Jaycox | Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer | Profile | |
Christine CPM | Exec Transformation | Profile | |
Jeh Johnson | Independent Director | Profile | |
Manpreet Grewal | Principal Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | Profile | |
Tara Carraro | Senior Officer | Profile | |
Emily CFA | Investor Officer | Profile | |
Colleen Darragh | Acting Controller | Profile | |
Kevin Lewis | General Manager - Investor Relations | Profile |
About United States Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as United States Steel often depends on how effective the management is. United States management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of United management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the United management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.05 | 0.05 | |
Return On Capital Employed | (0.02) | (0.02) | |
Return On Assets | 0.04 | 0.05 | |
Return On Equity | 0.08 | 0.09 |
The data published in United States' official financial statements usually reflect United States' business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of United States Steel. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by United accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what United States' liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Metals & Mining space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of United States' financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, United States' management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in United States' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of United States Steel. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of United States' management manipulating its earnings.
United States Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as United States use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare United States within its industry.United States Manpower Efficiency
Return on United States Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 735.6K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 286.4M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 41K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 16M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 137.4K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 53.5M |
Check out Your Current Watchlist to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in United States Steel. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in interest. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.
Complementary Tools for United Stock analysis
When running United States' price analysis, check to measure United States' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy United States is operating at the current time. Most of United States' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of United States' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move United States' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of United States to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data | |
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum |
Is United States' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of United States. If investors know United will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about United States listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.35) | Dividend Share 0.2 | Earnings Share 3.56 | Revenue Per Share 80.321 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.04) |
The market value of United States Steel is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of United that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of United States' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is United States' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because United States' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect United States' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between United States' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if United States is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, United States' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.