Microsoft Company Insiders

MSFT Stock  USD 404.27  7.57  1.84%   
Slightly above 89 percent of Microsoft's insiders are activelly selling. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that a very large number of Microsoft insiders are, at present, panicking. Microsoft employs about 221 K people. The company is managed by 37 executives with a total tenure of roughly 252 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 5972.97 employees per reported executive.
Satya Nadella  CEO
CEO and Director
John Thompson  Chairman
Independent Chairman of the Board

Microsoft's Insider Buying Vs Selling

11

 
Selling
 
Buying

Latest Trades

2024-03-11Kathleen T HoganDisposed 21955 @ 403.96View
2024-02-22Corp MicrosoftDisposed 1000000 @ 1.95View
2024-02-07Pete SessionsAcquired @ 414.05
2024-02-05Bradford L SmithDisposed 3303 @ 406.12View
2024-02-02Bradford L SmithDisposed 45000 @ 411.78View
2024-01-25Shri ThanedarDisposed @ 404.87
2024-01-23Kathy E. ManningAcquired @ 398.9
2024-01-19Blake D. MooreDisposed @ 398.67
2024-01-18Josh GottheimerDisposed @ 393.87
2024-01-03Tommy TubervilleDisposed @ 370.6
2023-12-19Shelley Moore CapitoDisposed @ 373.26
2023-12-18Shelley Moore CapitoDisposed @ 372.65
2023-12-14Jerry MoranDisposed @ 365.93
2023-12-08Kathleen T HoganDisposed 24681 @ 369View
2023-12-04John R. CurtisDisposed @ 369.14
2023-11-30Shelley Moore CapitoDisposed @ 378.91
2023-11-14Josh GottheimerDisposed @ 370.27
Monitoring Microsoft's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.

Acquired vs Disposed

Filed vs Not Filed

Insider sentiment refers to the collective sentiment or feeling of Microsoft's insiders - typically its officers, directors, and beneficial owners holding more than a certain percentage of the company's stock - about the future prospects of Microsoft. This sentiment is often gauged based on the trading activities of these insiders. If insiders are purchasing more shares of their own company, it may be interpreted as a bullish sentiment, indicating that they believe Microsoft's stock will rise in value. Conversely, if insiders are selling shares, it might be seen as bearish, suggesting they expect the stock price to drop.
  
Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Microsoft. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in census.
For more information on how to buy Microsoft Stock please use our How to Invest in Microsoft guide.

Microsoft's Workforce Through the Years

Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with Microsoft's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that Microsoft will maintain a workforce of slightly above 221000 employees by May 2024.
 
Dot-com Bubble
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid

Microsoft's latest congressional trading

Congressional trading in companies like Microsoft, is subject to rigorous scrutiny to prevent conflicts of interest and insider trading. This is governed by multiple SEC regulations which were established to foster transparency and deter members of Congress from leveraging non-public information for personal gain. This oversight helps maintain public trust and ensures that investments in Microsoft by those in governmental positions are based on the same information available to the general public.
2024-01-19Representative Blake MooreDisposed Under $15KVerify
2023-10-24Representative Greg StantonDisposed $15K to $50KVerify
2023-09-11Representative C. Scott FranklinDisposed $15,001 -Verify
2022-03-08Representative Dan NewhouseAcquired Under $15KVerify
2021-05-03Representative Ed CaseAcquired $50K to $100KVerify
2020-09-10Representative Francis RooneyDisposed Under $15KVerify
2020-08-28Representative David B. McKinleyDisposed Under $15KVerify
2020-07-31Senator Ron WydenAcquired $50K to $100KVerify
2020-04-14Senator David A Perdue , JrAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2020-04-06Representative Susan W. BrooksAcquired Under $15KVerify
2020-03-19Senator Kelly LoefflerAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2020-03-18Representative Gilbert CisnerosAcquired Under $15KVerify
2020-03-03Representative Earl BlumenauerAcquired Under $15KVerify
2019-12-18Representative John B. LarsonDisposed Under $15KVerify
2019-08-26Representative Richard W. AllenAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2019-02-28Senator Jack ReedAcquired Under $15KVerify
2019-01-29Senator James M InhofeAcquired $15K to $50KVerify
2019-01-08Representative K. Michael ConawayAcquired Under $15KVerify
2016-01-06Senator Sheldon WhitehouseAcquired Under $15KVerify
2014-04-03Senator Susan M. CollinsAcquired Under $15KVerify

Microsoft Management Team Effectiveness

The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1519 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1519 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.3917 %, meaning that it created $0.3917 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Microsoft's Return On Capital Employed is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to gain to 0.20 in 2024, whereas Return On Tangible Assets are likely to drop 0.22 in 2024. At this time, Microsoft's Total Current Liabilities is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to gain to about 497.5 B in 2024, whereas Change To Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 6.9 B in 2024.
Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to gain to about 7.2 B in 2024. Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to gain to about 87.4 B in 2024

Microsoft Workforce Comparison

Microsoft is considered to be number one stock in number of employees category among related companies. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is now estimated at about 281,445. Microsoft totals roughly 221,000 in number of employees claiming about 79% of equities under Information Technology industry.

Microsoft Profit Margins

The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.36 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.44 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.44.
Current ValueLast YearChange From Last Year 10 Year Trend
Gross Profit Margin0.870.79
Significantly Up
Very volatile
Net Profit Margin0.220.31
Way Down
Slightly volatile
Operating Profit Margin0.40.48
Fairly Down
Slightly volatile
Pretax Profit Margin0.420.48
Fairly Down
Slightly volatile
Return On Assets0.20.1756
Fairly Up
Slightly volatile
Return On Equity0.240.32
Way Down
Slightly volatile

Microsoft Insider Trading History

Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Microsoft insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Microsoft's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Microsoft insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
 
Dot-com Bubble
 
Housing Crash
 
Credit Downgrade
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
Buy/Sell Ratio# Purchases Trades# Sales TradesTotal Shares PurchasedTotal Shares Sold
2024-03-01
0.8947
17
19
 2,241 
 101,663 
2023-12-01
1.5
21
14
 2,531 
 59,075 
2023-09-01
1.3077
34
26
 394,528 
 269,949 
2023-06-01
1.4286
20
14
 2,755 
 65,413 
2023-03-01
1.5385
20
13
 3,703 
 29,909 
2022-12-01
1.6154
21
13
 3,873 
 39,522 
2022-09-01
1.2143
34
28
 533,683 
 376,490 
2022-06-01
4.2
21
5
 3,444 
 3,152 
2022-03-01
1.6429
23
14
 6,708 
 113,762 
2021-12-01
0.7308
19
26
 6,731 
 965,527 
2021-09-01
1.28
32
25
 609,582 
 416,056 
2021-06-01
1.5833
19
12
 12,246 
 87,208 
2021-03-01
1.3125
21
16
 907,795 
 694,922 
2020-12-01
2.3333
21
9
 104,198 
 291,470 
2020-09-01
1.1786
33
28
 1,065,320 
 822,676 
2020-06-01
2.1
21
10
 18,210 
 81,900 
2020-03-01
0.6897
20
29
 956,967 
 821,805 
2019-12-01
1.3125
21
16
 5,692 
 106,984 
2019-09-01
1.2333
37
30
 1,180,574 
 759,805 
2019-06-01
2.0
20
10
 6,208 
 232,244 
2019-03-01
1.1
22
20
 908,758 
 756,936 
2018-12-01
1.5
21
14
 8,580 
 298,573 
2018-09-01
1.0909
36
33
 1,628,442 
 1,416,509 
2018-06-01
3.1429
22
7
 14,637 
 22,244 
2018-03-01
1.5
21
14
 9,537 
 70,167 
2017-12-01
1.4615
19
13
 9,560 
 134,914 
2017-09-01
0.7778
28
36
 415,702 
 7,435,018 
2017-06-01
0.95
19
20
 26,207 
 15,075,519 
2017-03-01
0.5333
16
30
 10,481 
 23,680,702 
2016-12-01
1.4167
17
12
 76,323 
 8,074,311 
2016-09-01
0.7941
27
34
 634,443 
 26,635,042 
2016-06-01
0.9375
15
16
 11,749 
 8,106,576 
2016-03-01
0.9474
18
19
 13,307 
 8,040,055 
2015-12-01
0.6667
12
18
 8,111 
 26,884,776 
2015-09-01
1.1053
21
19
 753,766 
 8,528,179 
2015-06-01
0.8571
12
14
 9,382 
 8,074,052 
2015-03-01
1.3571
19
14
 1,067,409 
 8,038,940 
2014-12-01
1.0
15
15
 30,341 
 51,058,987 
2014-09-01
1.0
26
26
 1,321,356 
 20,705,924 
2014-06-01
1.1875
19
16
 3,077,398 
 20,111,786 
2014-03-01
1.0
18
18
 99,242 
 20,106,840 
2013-12-01
0.72
18
25
 165,386 
 20,578,247 
2013-09-01
1.0
24
24
 1,669,222 
 20,762,103 
2013-06-01
1.6667
15
9
 196,214 
 23,016,476 
2013-03-01
1.2727
14
11
 36,191 
 20,093,335 
2012-12-01
1.25
15
12
 17,945 
 20,615,444 
2012-09-01
1.0588
36
34
 2,598,297 
 20,876,632 
2012-06-01
1.9
19
10
 47,662 
 20,006,424 
2012-03-01
1.0
15
15
 201,892 
 20,571,011 
2011-12-01
1.1538
15
13
 625,534 
 21,359,003 
2011-09-01
0.6316
24
38
 1,370,954 
 20,907,177 
2011-06-01
1.4
14
10
 70,691 
 20,085,012 
2011-03-01
0.6341
26
41
 978,685 
 22,328,453 
2010-12-01
0.463
25
54
 739,613 
 96,739,543 
2010-09-01
0.5116
22
43
 1,104,060 
 20,820,573 
2010-06-01
0.5484
17
31
 2,765,097 
 25,532,015 
2010-03-01
1.0769
14
13
 110,215 
 20,233,880 
2009-12-01
0.561
23
41
 2,941,673 
 38,280,616 
2009-09-01
0.6744
29
43
 1,275,286 
 20,636,993 
2009-06-01
0.5
15
30
 15,464 
 20,281,852 
2009-03-01
1.3636
15
11
 409,768 
 20,000,000 
2008-12-01
0.8667
13
15
 13,704 
 20,010,000 
2008-09-01
0.9362
44
47
 2,103,911 
 21,002,938 
2008-06-01
0.0366
14
382
 159,704 
 20,368,297 
2008-03-01
1.875
15
8
 94,974 
 82,060 
2007-12-01
0.0225
12
533
 544,569 
 46,643,978 
2007-09-01
0.0249
15
602
 534,054 
 20,454,002 
2007-06-01
0.0332
8
241
 371,808 
 20,948,799 
2007-03-01
0.0218
11
504
 30,586 
 20,000,000 
2006-12-01
0.0221
7
317
 211,179 
 20,913,497 
2006-09-01
0.0494
16
324
 3,381,704 
 23,266,557 
2006-06-01
0.6667
6
9
 35,099 
 5,193 
2006-03-01
0.0932
22
236
 1,038,993 
 24,078,943 
2005-12-01
0.0723
18
249
 1,873,861 
 24,818,674 
2005-09-01
0.0608
16
263
 899,154 
 22,829,384 
2005-06-01
0.0714
12
168
 704,997 
 24,358,213 
2005-03-01
0.1045
14
134
 898,333 
 32,378,957 
2004-12-01
0.0698
15
215
 1,853,259 
 25,126,162 
2004-09-01
0.0923
25
271
 575,854 
 22,356,344 
2004-06-01
0.024
8
334
 416,132 
 25,650,783 
2004-03-01
0.0484
15
310
 2,982,912 
 25,413,944 
2003-12-01
0.0173
4
231
 110,486 
 30,217,067 
2003-09-01
0.0552
36
652
 2,109,470 
 23,629,352 
2002-09-01
17.0
17
1
 11,250,000 
 320,000 
2000-06-01
0.5
1
2
 10.00 
 27,500 

Microsoft Notable Stakeholders

A Microsoft stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Microsoft often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Microsoft's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Microsoft's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Satya NadellaCEO and DirectorProfile
Bradford LCAPresident ChairmanProfile
John ThompsonIndependent Chairman of the BoardProfile
Sean VenturaVice President - Information Security, Chief Information Security OfficerProfile
JeanPhilippe CourtoisExecutive Vice President and President - Microsoft Global Sales, Marketing and OperationsProfile
Christopher CaposselaExecutive Vice President Chief Marketing OfficerProfile
Margaret JohnsonExecutive Vice President - Business DevelopmentProfile
Bradford SmithExecutive Vice President General Counsel, SecretaryProfile
Keith LorizioVice President - North America SalesProfile
Kathleen HoganExecutive Vice President - Human ResourcesProfile
Amy HoodCFO and Executive VPProfile
Brian TurnerCOOProfile
Kevin ScottCTOProfile
James ScottExecutive CTOProfile
Ifeanyi AmahCTOProfile
Charles ScharfDirectorProfile
Helmut PankeIndependent DirectorProfile
Penny PritzkerIndependent DirectorProfile
Sandra PetersonIndependent DirectorProfile
Teri ListStollIndependent DirectorProfile
Charles NoskiIndependent DirectorProfile
William GatesFounder and Technology Advisor, DirectorProfile
Mason MorfitIndependent DirectorProfile
Padmasree WarriorIndependent DirectorProfile
Hugh JohnstonDirectorProfile
Arne SorensonIndependent DirectorProfile
John StantonDirectorProfile
Reid HoffmanDirectorProfile
Hossein NowbarChief OfficerProfile
Christopher YoungStrategy DevelopmentProfile
Takeshi NumotoExecutive OfficerProfile
Chris SuhGeneral Manager - Investor RelationsProfile
Judson AlthoffExecutive OfficerProfile
Frank ShawCorp CommunicationsProfile
Brett IversenVice RelationsProfile
Keith EsqDeputy VPProfile
Alice JollaCorporate OfficerProfile

About Microsoft Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Microsoft often depends on how effective the management is. Microsoft management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Microsoft management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Microsoft management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Return On Tangible Assets 0.25  0.22 
Return On Capital Employed 0.33  0.36 
Return On Assets 0.18  0.20 
Return On Equity 0.32  0.24 
The data published in Microsoft's official financial statements usually reflect Microsoft's business processes, product offerings, services, and other fundamental events. But there are other numbers, ratios, or fundamental indicators derived from these statements that are easier to understand and visualize within the underlying realities that drive quantitative information of Microsoft. For example, before you start analyzing numbers published by Microsoft accountants, it's critical to develop an understanding of what Microsoft's liquidity, profitability, and earnings quality are in the context of the Software space in which it operates.
Please note, the presentation of Microsoft's financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Microsoft's management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Whatever the case, the imprecision that can be found in Microsoft's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Microsoft. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Microsoft's management manipulating its earnings.

Microsoft Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Microsoft use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Microsoft within its industry.

Microsoft Manpower Efficiency

Return on Microsoft Manpower

Revenue Per Employee958.9K
Revenue Per Executive5.7B
Net Income Per Employee327.4K
Net Income Per Executive2B
Working Capital Per Employee362.5K
Working Capital Per Executive2.2B
When determining whether Microsoft is a good investment, qualitative aspects like company management, corporate governance, and ethical practices play a significant role. A comparison with peer companies also provides context and helps to understand if Microsoft Stock is undervalued or overvalued. This multi-faceted approach, blending both quantitative and qualitative analysis, forms a solid foundation for making an informed investment decision about Microsoft Stock. Highlighted below are key reports to facilitate an investment decision about Microsoft Stock:
Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Microsoft. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in census.
For more information on how to buy Microsoft Stock please use our How to Invest in Microsoft guide.
Note that the Microsoft information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Microsoft's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Complementary Tools for Microsoft Stock analysis

When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Is Microsoft's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Microsoft. If investors know Microsoft will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Microsoft listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth
0.332
Dividend Share
2.86
Earnings Share
11.07
Revenue Per Share
30.612
Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.176
The market value of Microsoft is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Microsoft that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Microsoft's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Microsoft's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Microsoft's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Microsoft's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Microsoft's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Microsoft is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Microsoft's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.