Correlation Between Microsoft and GM

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and GM at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and GM into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and General Motors, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and GM and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of GM. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and GM.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and GM

0.83
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and GM is 0.83. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and General Motors in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on General Motors and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with GM. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of General Motors has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and GM go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and GM

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to under-perform the GM. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Microsoft is 1.58 times less risky than GM. The stock trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The General Motors is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4,082  in General Motors on January 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  187.00  from holding General Motors or generate 4.58% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  General Motors

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in May 2024.
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unsteady primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Microsoft and GM Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and GM

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and GM positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, GM can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GM will offset losses from the drop in GM's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and General Motors pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk