Correlation Between Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fairfax Financial Holdings and Cohen Steers Infrastructure, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fairfax Financial with a short position of Cohen Steers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers.

Diversification Opportunities for Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fairfax and Cohen is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fairfax Financial Holdings and Cohen Steers Infrastructure in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cohen Steers Infrast and Fairfax Financial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fairfax Financial Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Cohen Steers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cohen Steers Infrast has no effect on the direction of Fairfax Financial i.e., Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Fairfax Financial Holdings is expected to generate 2.33 times more return on investment than Cohen Steers. However, Fairfax Financial is 2.33 times more volatile than Cohen Steers Infrastructure. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cohen Steers Infrastructure is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  136,587  in Fairfax Financial Holdings on January 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  11,138  from holding Fairfax Financial Holdings or generate 8.15% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Fairfax Financial Holdings  vs.  Cohen Steers Infrastructure

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Fairfax Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fairfax Financial Holdings are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating technical indicators, Fairfax Financial may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in May 2024.
Cohen Steers Infrast 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cohen Steers Infrastructure are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fairfax Financial and Cohen Steers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fairfax Financial position performs unexpectedly, Cohen Steers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cohen Steers will offset losses from the drop in Cohen Steers' long position.
The idea behind Fairfax Financial Holdings and Cohen Steers Infrastructure pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities