Correlation Between Ford and Cohen Steers

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ford and Cohen Steers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ford and Cohen Steers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ford Motor and Cohen Steers Infrastructure, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ford and Cohen Steers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ford with a short position of Cohen Steers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ford and Cohen Steers.

Diversification Opportunities for Ford and Cohen Steers

0.55
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ford and Cohen is 0.55. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ford Motor and Cohen Steers Infrastructure in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cohen Steers Infrast and Ford is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ford Motor are associated (or correlated) with Cohen Steers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cohen Steers Infrast has no effect on the direction of Ford i.e., Ford and Cohen Steers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ford and Cohen Steers

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Ford Motor is expected to under-perform the Cohen Steers. In addition to that, Ford is 2.52 times more volatile than Cohen Steers Infrastructure. It trades about -0.14 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Cohen Steers Infrastructure is currently generating about -0.25 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,261  in Cohen Steers Infrastructure on January 20, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (99.00) from holding Cohen Steers Infrastructure or give up 4.38% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ford Motor  vs.  Cohen Steers Infrastructure

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ford Motor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ford Motor are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unfluctuating technical and fundamental indicators, Ford may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in May 2024.
Cohen Steers Infrast 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Cohen Steers Infrastructure has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Ford and Cohen Steers Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ford and Cohen Steers

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ford and Cohen Steers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ford position performs unexpectedly, Cohen Steers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cohen Steers will offset losses from the drop in Cohen Steers' long position.
The idea behind Ford Motor and Cohen Steers Infrastructure pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
AI Investment Finder
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios