Helmut Panke - Microsoft Independent Director
MSFT Stock | USD 420.72 0.71 0.17% |
Director
Dr. Helmut Gunter Wilhelm Panke, Ph.D. is an Independent Director of the Company. He served as Chairman of the Board of Management of BMW Bayerische Motoren Werke AG from 2002 through 2006. From 1999 to 2002, he served as a member of the Board of Management for Finance. From 1996 to 1999, Dr. Panke was a member of the Board of Management for Human Resources and Information Technology. In his role as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BMW Holding Corporationration from 1993 to 1996, he was responsible for the companys North American activities. He joined BMW in 1982. Qualifications Dr. Panke brings a global perspective to the Board. His almost 25year career at BMW culminated in leading the company from 2002 to 2006, giving him experience as chief executive officer of a major international public corporation. In addition, his extensive rsum at BMW includes leadership roles in a variety of business disciplines including finance, information technology, worldwide human resources, and operations since 2003.
Age | 71 |
Tenure | 21 years |
Address | One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, United States, 98052-6399 |
Phone | 425 882 8080 |
Web | https://www.microsoft.com |
Microsoft Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1519 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1519 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of 0.3917 %, meaning that it created $0.3917 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Microsoft's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Microsoft manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Microsoft's Return On Capital Employed is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Return On Assets is likely to gain to 0.20 in 2024, whereas Return On Equity is likely to drop 0.24 in 2024. At this time, Microsoft's Total Current Liabilities is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to gain to about 497.5 B in 2024, whereas Change To Liabilities is likely to drop slightly above 6.9 B in 2024.Similar Executives
Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
David Steiner | Vulcan Materials | 60 | |
Donald Rice | Vulcan Materials | 74 | |
Sabine Chalmers | Coty Inc | 53 | |
Erhard Schoewel | Coty Inc | 71 | |
Loudon Owen | Academy Sports OutdoorsInc | N/A | |
Douglas McGregor | Vulcan Materials | 74 | |
Robert Singer | Coty Inc | 68 | |
O Hall | Vulcan Materials | 63 | |
Michael Wilson | Vulcan Materials | 55 | |
Thomas Fanning | Vulcan Materials | 64 | |
Jack Stahl | Coty Inc | 61 | |
Anna Makanju | Coty Inc | 44 | |
Karin Ireton | Academy Sports OutdoorsInc | 59 | |
Vincent Trosino | Vulcan Materials | 74 | |
Paul Novelly | Western Metals | 73 | |
Kathleen WilsonThompson | Vulcan Materials | 59 | |
Olivier Goudet | Coty Inc | 56 | |
Adrian Reynolds | Academy Sports OutdoorsInc | N/A | |
Paul Michaels | Coty Inc | 64 | |
Lee Styslinger | Vulcan Materials | 60 | |
Kathleen Quirk | Vulcan Materials | 57 |
Management Performance
Return On Equity | 0.39 | |||
Return On Asset | 0.15 |
Microsoft Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Microsoft's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Microsoft inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Microsoft. The board's role is to monitor Microsoft's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Microsoft's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Microsoft's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Bradford LCA, President Chairman | ||
Hossein Nowbar, Chief Officer | ||
Charles Scharf, Director | ||
Sean Ventura, Vice President - Information Security, Chief Information Security Officer | ||
Christopher Young, Strategy Development | ||
Takeshi Numoto, Executive Officer | ||
Chris Suh, General Manager - Investor Relations | ||
Helmut Panke, Independent Director | ||
JeanPhilippe Courtois, Executive Vice President and President - Microsoft Global Sales, Marketing and Operations | ||
Penny Pritzker, Independent Director | ||
Judson Althoff, Executive Officer | ||
Sandra Peterson, Independent Director | ||
Frank Shaw, Corp Communications | ||
Teri ListStoll, Independent Director | ||
Charles Noski, Independent Director | ||
Christopher Capossela, Executive Vice President Chief Marketing Officer | ||
Margaret Johnson, Executive Vice President - Business Development | ||
John Thompson, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
Amy Hood, CFO and Executive VP | ||
William Gates, Founder and Technology Advisor, Director | ||
Mason Morfit, Independent Director | ||
Padmasree Warrior, Independent Director | ||
Bradford Smith, Executive Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | ||
Brett Iversen, Vice Relations | ||
Hugh Johnston, Director | ||
Arne Sorenson, Independent Director | ||
Satya Nadella, CEO and Director | ||
Kevin Scott, CTO | ||
Keith Esq, Deputy VP | ||
Keith Lorizio, Vice President - North America Sales | ||
James Scott, Executive CTO | ||
Brian Turner, COO | ||
Kathleen Hogan, Executive Vice President - Human Resources | ||
Alice Jolla, Corporate Officer | ||
John Stanton, Director | ||
Reid Hoffman, Director | ||
Ifeanyi Amah, CTO |
Microsoft Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Microsoft a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Return On Equity | 0.39 | |||
Return On Asset | 0.15 | |||
Profit Margin | 0.36 % | |||
Operating Margin | 0.44 % | |||
Current Valuation | 3.14 T | |||
Shares Outstanding | 7.43 B | |||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.05 % | |||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 73.86 % | |||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 54.21 M | |||
Price To Earning | 26.64 X |
Microsoft Investors Sentiment
The influence of Microsoft's investor sentiment on the probability of its price appreciation or decline could be a good factor in your decision-making process regarding taking a position in Microsoft. The overall investor sentiment generally increases the direction of a stock movement in a one-year investment horizon. However, the impact of investor sentiment on the entire stock market does not have solid backing from leading economists and market statisticians.
Investor biases related to Microsoft's public news can be used to forecast risks associated with an investment in Microsoft. The trend in average sentiment can be used to explain how an investor holding Microsoft can time the market purely based on public headlines and social activities around Microsoft. Please note that most equities that are difficult to arbitrage are affected by market sentiment the most.
Microsoft's market sentiment shows the aggregated news analyzed to detect positive and negative mentions from the text and comments. The data is normalized to provide daily scores for Microsoft's and other traded tickers. The bigger the bubble, the more accurate is the estimated score. Higher bars for a given day show more participation in the average Microsoft's news discussions. The higher the estimated score, the more favorable is the investor's outlook on Microsoft.
Microsoft Implied Volatility | 17.1 |
Microsoft's implied volatility exposes the market's sentiment of Microsoft stock's possible movements over time. However, it does not forecast the overall direction of its price. In a nutshell, if Microsoft's implied volatility is high, the market thinks the stock has potential for high price swings in either direction. On the other hand, the low implied volatility suggests that Microsoft stock will not fluctuate a lot when Microsoft's options are near their expiration.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Microsoft in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Microsoft's short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Microsoft options trading.
Building efficient market-beating portfolios requires time, education, and a lot of computing power!
The Portfolio Architect is an AI-driven system that provides multiple benefits to our users by leveraging cutting-edge machine learning algorithms, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling to automate the process of asset selection and portfolio construction, saving time and reducing human error for individual and institutional investors.
Try AI Portfolio ArchitectCheck out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Microsoft. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in census. For more information on how to buy Microsoft Stock please use our How to Invest in Microsoft guide.Note that the Microsoft information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Microsoft's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.
Complementary Tools for Microsoft Stock analysis
When running Microsoft's price analysis, check to measure Microsoft's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Microsoft is operating at the current time. Most of Microsoft's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Microsoft's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Microsoft's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Microsoft to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing | |
Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |
Is Microsoft's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Microsoft. If investors know Microsoft will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Microsoft listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.332 | Dividend Share 2.86 | Earnings Share 11.04 | Revenue Per Share 30.612 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.176 |
The market value of Microsoft is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Microsoft that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Microsoft's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Microsoft's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Microsoft's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Microsoft's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Microsoft's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Microsoft is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Microsoft's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.