Harris DeLoach - Duke Energy Independent Director
| DUK Stock | USD 94.50 1.63 1.76% |
Director
Mr. Harris E. DeLoach is no longer Independent Director of Duke Energy Corporationration Mr. DeLoach qualifications for election include his knowledge of the environmental regulations particularly in Duke Energy South Carolina service territory as a result of his experience leading a public company with global manufacturing operations headquartered in South Carolina. His familiarity with the economic and business development issues facing the communities we serve is also extremely valuable to the Board and its committees. As a former practicing attorney and a board member of other public and privately held companies he also brings indepth legal and board governance experience. Mr. DeLoach has served as Executive Chairman of Sonoco Products Company a manufacturer of paperboard and paper and plastic packaging products since March 2013. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Sonoco Products Company from July 2000 to March 2013 and Chairman of the Sonoco Products Board of Directors from April 2005 to March 2013. Prior to joining Sonoco Products in 1986 Mr. DeLoach was in a private law practice and served as an outside counsel to Sonoco Products for 15 years. since 2012.
| Age | 70 |
| Tenure | 12 years |
| Address | 525 South Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC, United States, 28202 |
| Phone | 800 488 3853 |
| Web | https://www.duke-energy.com |
Duke Energy Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0254 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0254 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0849 %, implying that it generated $0.0849 on every 100 dollars invested. Duke Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Duke Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is expected to rise to 0.03 this year. Return On Capital Employed is expected to rise to 0.06 this year. At this time, Duke Energy's Non Current Liabilities Total is quite stable compared to the past year. Change To Liabilities is expected to rise to about 760.7 M this year, although the value of Total Current Liabilities will most likely fall to about 10.2 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Mauricio Carvalho | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | 54 | |
| Marcelo Freitas | Centrais Eltricas Brasileiras | 47 | |
| Jose Rangel | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | 77 | |
| Mario Espada | Central Puerto SA | N/A | |
| Luiz Ferreira | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | 61 | |
| John Sznewajs | CMS Energy | 53 | |
| Juan Salas | Central Puerto SA | N/A | |
| Bruno Carvalho | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | N/A | |
| Walter Malieni | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | 62 | |
| Luiz Monteiro | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | N/A | |
| Mozart Araujo | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | N/A | |
| Samuel Hanan | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | 67 | |
| Jorge Villegas | Central Puerto SA | N/A | |
| Marcelo Freitas | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | 47 | |
| Justo Senz | Central Puerto SA | 66 | |
| Elena Landau | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | N/A | |
| Jailson Alves | Centrais Electricas Brasileiras | 39 | |
| Amelia Murisi | Central Puerto SA | N/A | |
| Diego Petracchi | Central Puerto SA | N/A | |
| Suzanne Shank | CMS Energy | 59 | |
| Stephen Ewing | CMS Energy | 74 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.0849 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0254 |
Duke Energy Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Duke Energy's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Duke Energy inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Duke. The board's role is to monitor Duke Energy's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Duke Energy's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Duke Energy's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Marya Rose, Independent Director | ||
| W Dunbar, Independent Director | ||
| Harris DeLoach, Independent Director | ||
| Keith Butler, Senior Vice President Chief Security Officer | ||
| Brian Woody, Managing Management | ||
| R Glenn, Senior Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy Florida and Midwest | ||
| Steven Young, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Kodwo GharteyTagoe, Executive Vice President, Corporate Secretary, Chief Legal Officer | ||
| E McKee, Independent Director | ||
| James Hance, Independent Director | ||
| Julia JD, Executive Carolinas | ||
| Franklin Yoho, Executive Vice President and President - Natural Gas | ||
| Dwight Jacobs, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, Tax and Controller | ||
| Harry Sideris, Senior Vice President - Customer Experience and Services | ||
| Jack Sullivan, VP Relations | ||
| Bonnie Titone, Chief Information Officer | ||
| James Rhodes, Independent Director | ||
| Nicholas Fanandakis, Independent Director | ||
| Daniel DiMicco, Independent Director | ||
| Barbara Higgins, Senior Vice President Chief Customer Officer | ||
| Marie McKee, Independent Director | ||
| Julie Janson, Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy Carolinas | ||
| Alex Glenn, Senior Vice President - State and Federal Regulatory Legal Support | ||
| Caroline Dorsa, Independent Director | ||
| Kelvin Henderson, Senior Vice President Chief Nuclear Officer | ||
| Ben Waldrep, Senior Vice President - North Carolina Nuclear Operations | ||
| Abby Motsinger, Vice Relations | ||
| Robert Davis, Independent Director | ||
| Paul Draovitch, Senior Vice President - Environmental Health and Safety | ||
| Brian Savoy, Senior Vice President, Chief Transformation and Administrative Officer | ||
| Melody Birmingham, Senior Vice President Chief Administrative Officer | ||
| Ann Gray, Chairman of the Board | ||
| Katherine Neebe, Senior Officer | ||
| Tom Skains, Director | ||
| Michael Browning, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Lynn Good, Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | ||
| John Herron, Independent Director | ||
| Cameron Mcdonald, Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer and Vice president | ||
| Annette Clayton, Independent Director | ||
| Melissa Feldmeier, Chief Ethics and Compliance Officer, Vice President | ||
| Clark Gillespy, Senior Vice President - Economic Development | ||
| Charles Moorman, Independent Director | ||
| Katie Aittola, Chief Risk Officer, Vice President - Global Risk Management | ||
| Regis Repko, Senior Vice President and Chief Fossil/Hydro Officer | ||
| Thomas Skains, Independent Director | ||
| Oscar Suris, Senior Officer | ||
| Theodore Craver, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Joseph Crapster, Manager-Shareholder Communications | ||
| John Forsgren, Independent Director | ||
| Carlos Saladrigas, Independent Director | ||
| Melissa Anderson, Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President - Administration | ||
| Dhiaa Jamil, Executive VP and President of Regulated Generation and Transmission | ||
| T Gillespie, Senior Vice President Chief Generation Office | ||
| William Currens, Senior Vice President Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | ||
| Idalene Kesner, Independent Director | ||
| William Webster, Independent Director | ||
| Jennifer Weber, Chief Human Resource Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Peter Toomey, Senior Strategy | ||
| Michael Angelakis, Director | ||
| Louis Renjel, Senior Vice President - External Affairs and Communications | ||
| Douglas Esamann, Executive Vice President - Energy Solutions and President, Midwest or Florida Regions and Natural Gas Business | ||
| Nelson Peeler, Fuels Transmission | ||
| Anette Clayton, Independent Director | ||
| Preston Gillespie, Senior Vice President Chief Generation Office | ||
| Ronald Reising, Chief Human Resource Officer, Senior Vice President | ||
| William Kennard, Independent Director | ||
| James Hyler, Independent Director | ||
| Cynthia Lee, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President Controller | ||
| Lloyd Yates, Executive Vice President - Customer and Delivery Operations and President - Carolinas Region | ||
| Michael Pacilio, Independent Director | ||
| Derrick Burks, Independent Director | ||
| Amy Hunter, VP Officer | ||
| Karl Newlin, Senior Treasurer | ||
| A Mullinax, Executive Vice President-Strategic Services | ||
| Henry Sideris, Executive Vice President, Customer Experience, Solutions and Services | ||
| Richard Meserve, Director |
Duke Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Duke Energy a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.0849 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0254 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.1 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.29 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 155.99 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 771.46 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.14 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 66.61 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 8.4 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 56.97 X |
Pair Trading with Duke Energy
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Duke Energy position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Duke Energy will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Duke Stock
| 0.87 | ED | Consolidated Edison Buyout Trend | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Duke Energy could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Duke Energy when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Duke Energy - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Duke Energy to buy it.
The correlation of Duke Energy is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Duke Energy moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Duke Energy moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Duke Energy can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Duke Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. For more information on how to buy Duke Stock please use our How to buy in Duke Stock guide.You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
Complementary Tools for Duke Stock analysis
When running Duke Energy's price analysis, check to measure Duke Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Duke Energy is operating at the current time. Most of Duke Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Duke Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Duke Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Duke Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
| Portfolio Optimization Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
| Global Markets Map Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes | |
| Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
| Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios |
Is Duke Energy's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Duke Energy. If investors know Duke will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Duke Energy listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.12) | Dividend Share 4.06 | Earnings Share 5.35 | Revenue Per Share 37.097 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.02) |
The market value of Duke Energy is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Duke that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Duke Energy's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Duke Energy's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Duke Energy's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Duke Energy's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Duke Energy's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Duke Energy is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Duke Energy's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.