John Cywinski - Dine Brands President of Applebee's Business Unit
DIN Stock | USD 46.48 0.30 0.65% |
President
Mr. John C. Cywinski is President of Applebee, a subsidiary of the Company. Mr. Cywinksi served as Executive Vice President of Strategic Innovation and Marketing at Brinker International, Inc. from March 2016 to March 2017. Mr. Cywinski was previously with Yum Brands, Inc. in several roles from August 2010 to April 2014, including as President, KFC Corporation U.S. from November 2011 to April 2014. since 2017.
Age | 61 |
Tenure | 7 years |
Address | 10 West Walnut Street, Pasadena, CA, United States, 91103 |
Phone | 818 240 6055 |
Web | https://www.dinebrands.com |
Dine Brands Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0652 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0652 of profit. This is way below average. Dine Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Dine Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 29th of March 2024, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.14. In addition to that, Return On Assets is likely to drop to 0.04. At this time, Dine Brands' Other Current Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 29th of March 2024, Deferred Long Term Asset Charges is likely to grow to about 57.6 M, while Total Assets are likely to drop about 1.6 B.Similar Executives
Showing other executives | PRESIDENT Age | ||
Clyde Tuggle | The Coca Cola | 55 | |
Steven Mizell | Merck Company | 60 | |
Michael Holston | General Electric | 62 | |
James Kapenstein | Walt Disney | N/A | |
George Davis | Intel | 66 | |
Irving Tan | Cisco Systems | 47 | |
Zenia Mucha | Walt Disney | 64 | |
Steven Whaley | Walmart | 56 | |
Julie Gerberding | Merck Company | 64 | |
Karen McKee | Exxon Mobil Corp | 56 | |
Philip Musser | The Boeing | 44 | |
Mark Chandler | Cisco Systems | 61 | |
Daniel Bartlett | Walmart | 48 | |
Willie Deese | Merck Company | 59 | |
Robert Franklin | Exxon Mobil Corp | 59 | |
Sandra Rivera | Intel | 58 | |
William Colton | Exxon Mobil Corp | 62 | |
Randy Cleveland | Exxon Mobil Corp | 53 | |
Patrick Shanahan | The Boeing | 53 | |
Sanat Chattopadhyay | Merck Company | 61 | |
Carolina Happe | General Electric | 52 |
Management Performance
Return On Asset | 0.0652 |
Dine Brands Global Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Dine Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Dine Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Dine. The board's role is to monitor Dine Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Dine Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Dine Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Christine Son, Senior Vice President Legal, General Counsel, Company Secretary | ||
Richard Dahl, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
Lilian Tomovich, Independent Director | ||
Gregory Bever, VP Officer | ||
Jay Johns, President - IHOP Business Unit | ||
Sarah CannonFoster, Chief Officer | ||
Darren Rebelez, President IHOP Business Unit | ||
Tony Moralejo, President Development | ||
Michael Hyter, Independent Director | ||
Brett Levy, Vice Treasury | ||
Larry Kay, Independent Director | ||
Vance Chang, Chief Financial Officer | ||
Douglas Pasquale, Independent Director | ||
Susan Nelson, Vice Affairs | ||
Stephen Joyce, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
Allison Hall, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
Charles Scaccia, Senior Operations | ||
Caroline Nahas, Independent Director | ||
John Cywinski, President of Applebee's Business Unit | ||
Howard Berk, Independent Director | ||
Thomas Song, Chief Financial Officer | ||
Thomas Emrey, CFO | ||
John Jakubek, Sr. VP of HR | ||
Ken Diptee, Executive Director | ||
Susan Collyns, Independent Director | ||
Greggory Kalvin, Senior Vice President Corporate Controller | ||
John Peyton, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
Justin Skelton, Chief Officer | ||
Julia Stewart, Chairman and CEO | ||
Gilbert Ray, Independent Director | ||
Daniel Brestle, Independent Director | ||
Martha Poulter, Independent Director | ||
Patrick Rose, Independent Director | ||
Bryan Adel, Senior Vice President - Legal, General Counsel, Secretary | ||
Daniel Olmo, President of International |
Dine Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Dine Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Return On Asset | 0.0652 | ||||
Profit Margin | 0.12 % | ||||
Operating Margin | 0.22 % | ||||
Current Valuation | 2.14 B | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 15.25 M | ||||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 2.62 % | ||||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 94.71 % | ||||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 999.59 K | ||||
Price To Earning | 13.57 X | ||||
Price To Sales | 0.85 X |
Dine Brands Investors Sentiment
The influence of Dine Brands' investor sentiment on the probability of its price appreciation or decline could be a good factor in your decision-making process regarding taking a position in Dine. The overall investor sentiment generally increases the direction of a stock movement in a one-year investment horizon. However, the impact of investor sentiment on the entire stock market does not have solid backing from leading economists and market statisticians.
Investor biases related to Dine Brands' public news can be used to forecast risks associated with an investment in Dine. The trend in average sentiment can be used to explain how an investor holding Dine can time the market purely based on public headlines and social activities around Dine Brands Global. Please note that most equities that are difficult to arbitrage are affected by market sentiment the most.
Dine Brands' market sentiment shows the aggregated news analyzed to detect positive and negative mentions from the text and comments. The data is normalized to provide daily scores for Dine Brands' and other traded tickers. The bigger the bubble, the more accurate is the estimated score. Higher bars for a given day show more participation in the average Dine Brands' news discussions. The higher the estimated score, the more favorable is the investor's outlook on Dine Brands.
Some investors attempt to determine whether the market's mood is bullish or bearish by monitoring changes in market sentiment. Unlike more traditional methods such as technical analysis, investor sentiment usually refers to the aggregate attitude towards Dine Brands in the overall investment community. So, suppose investors can accurately measure the market's sentiment. In that case, they can use it for their benefit. For example, some tools to gauge market sentiment could be utilized using contrarian indexes, Dine Brands' short interest history, or implied volatility extrapolated from Dine Brands options trading.
Pair Trading with Dine Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Dine Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to Dine Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Dine Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Dine Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Dine Brands Global to buy it.
The correlation of Dine Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Dine Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Dine Brands Global moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Dine Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Investing Opportunities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Dine Brands Global. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in gross domestic product. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.
Complementary Tools for Dine Stock analysis
When running Dine Brands' price analysis, check to measure Dine Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Dine Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Dine Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Dine Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Dine Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Dine Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals |
Is Dine Brands' industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Dine Brands. If investors know Dine will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Dine Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 1.978 | Dividend Share 2.04 | Earnings Share 6.22 | Revenue Per Share 54.557 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.01) |
The market value of Dine Brands Global is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Dine that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Dine Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Dine Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Dine Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Dine Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Dine Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Dine Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Dine Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.