Rejji Hayes - CMS Energy Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
| CMS Stock | USD 59.55 1.07 1.83% |
President
Mr. Rejji P. Hayes is Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President of the Company. Hayes Prior to joining CMS Energy and Consumers, Mr. Hayes was executive vice president and CFO for ITC Holdings Corporationration, a nonaffiliated company, from May 2014 through November 2016. Mr. Hayes started with ITC Holdings Corporationration in 2012 as vice president of finance and treasurer. since 2017.
| Age | 49 |
| Tenure | 7 years |
| Address | One Energy Plaza, Jackson, MI, United States, 49201 |
| Phone | 517 788 0550 |
| Web | https://www.cmsenergy.com |
CMS Energy Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0273 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0273 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1027 %, implying that it generated $0.1027 on every 100 dollars invested. CMS Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well CMS Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to gain to 0.03 in 2024. Return On Capital Employed is likely to gain to 0.05 in 2024. At this time, CMS Energy's Return On Tangible Assets are comparatively stable compared to the past year. Intangibles To Total Assets is likely to gain to 0.09 in 2024, whereas Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 17.1 B in 2024.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | PRESIDENT Age | ||
| Miguel Arechabala | Nextera Energy | 59 | |
| Lana Hillebrand | American Electric Power | 58 | |
| Charles Patton | American Electric Power | 60 | |
| Deborah Caplan | Nextera Energy | 58 | |
| Mark McCullough | American Electric Power | 60 | |
| Jeffrey LaFleur | American Electric Power | 56 | |
| Anthony Kavanagh | American Electric Power | N/A | |
| Andrew Reis | American Electric Power | N/A | |
| Charles Zebula | American Electric Power | 63 | |
| Julie Sloat | American Electric Power | 45 | |
| Daniel Groff | American Electric Power | 52 | |
| Terrell Crews | Nextera Energy | 42 | |
| Dennis Welch | American Electric Power | 62 | |
| Stephan Haynes | American Electric Power | 63 | |
| Raja Sundararajan | American Electric Power | 40 | |
| Benjamin III | American Electric Power | 66 | |
| Thomas Kirkpatrick | American Electric Power | 59 | |
| Charles Sieving | Nextera Energy | 51 | |
| Lisa Barton | American Electric Power | 54 | |
| Stanley Partlow | American Electric Power | N/A | |
| Chris Beam | American Electric Power | 46 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.1 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0273 |
CMS Energy Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the CMS Energy's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: CMS Energy inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of CMS. The board's role is to monitor CMS Energy's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. CMS Energy's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, CMS Energy's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Melissa Gleespen, Vice President Corporate Secretary | ||
| Laura Wright, Independent Director | ||
| Angela Thompkins, Vice President and Chief Diversity Officer | ||
| William Harvey, Presiding Independent Director | ||
| John Sznewajs, Independent Director | ||
| Catherine Reynolds, Sr. VP and General Counsel | ||
| Catherine Hendrian, Senior Vice President | ||
| David Mengebier, Chief Compliance Officer, Sr. VP of Gov.al and Public Affairs and Chief Compliance Officer of Consumers Energy Company | ||
| Myrna Soto, Independent Director | ||
| Norm Kapala, Vice President | ||
| Tamara Faber, VP Officer | ||
| Glenn Barba, Vice President Controller, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| LeeRoy Wells, Senior Vice President - Operations | ||
| TRAVIS UPHAUS, Director Investor Relations | ||
| Jason Shore, Treasurer Relations | ||
| Stephen Ewing, Independent Director | ||
| Richard Gabrys, Independent Director | ||
| Daniel Malone, Sr. VP | ||
| John Russell, CEO and President Director, Member of Audit Committee and Member of Fin. Committee | ||
| Garrick Rochow, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Shaun Johnson, Senior Vice President General Counsel | ||
| Ronald Tanski, Independent Director | ||
| Deborah Butler, Independent Director | ||
| Suzanne Shank, Independent Director | ||
| Srikanth Maddipati, VP Treasurer | ||
| David Joos, Non-Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
| Scott McIntosh, Chief Accounting Officer, Vice President - Tax, Controller | ||
| Shaun JD, Senior Counsel | ||
| Patricia Poppe, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Kurt Darrow, Independent Director | ||
| Brian Rich, Senior Vice President - Customer Experience and Technology, Chief Customer Officer | ||
| Christine Wisniewski, Vice President - Operations Performance | ||
| Philip Lochner, Presiding Independent Director | ||
| Brandon Hofmeister, Senior Vice President | ||
| Tonya Berry, Senior Vice President - Transformation and Engineering | ||
| Jean Brossoit, Senior Vice President | ||
| Thomas Webb, CFO and Executive VP | ||
| John Butler, Sr. VP | ||
| Amanda Wagenschutz, Vice President - People and Culture Operations | ||
| Jon Barfield, Independent Director | ||
| PHILLIP McANDREWS, Director - Investor Relations | ||
| Rejji Hayes, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | ||
| Venkat Rao, Senior Vice President | ||
| Jim Beechey, VP Officer |
CMS Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is CMS Energy a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.1 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0273 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.12 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.23 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 33 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 298.62 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.48 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 96.24 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 11.66 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 20.03 X |
Pair Trading with CMS Energy
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if CMS Energy position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CMS Energy will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with CMS Stock
| 0.8 | D | Dominion Energy Financial Report 3rd of May 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.84 | ES | Eversource Energy Financial Report 1st of May 2024 | PairCorr |
| 0.79 | FE | FirstEnergy Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
Moving against CMS Stock
| 0.66 | HE | Hawaiian Electric Buyout Trend | PairCorr |
| 0.44 | EDN | Empresa Distribuidora Financial Report 9th of May 2024 | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to CMS Energy could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace CMS Energy when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back CMS Energy - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling CMS Energy to buy it.
The correlation of CMS Energy is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as CMS Energy moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if CMS Energy moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for CMS Energy can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in CMS Energy. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in population. For more information on how to buy CMS Stock please use our How to Invest in CMS Energy guide.You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.
Complementary Tools for CMS Stock analysis
When running CMS Energy's price analysis, check to measure CMS Energy's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy CMS Energy is operating at the current time. Most of CMS Energy's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of CMS Energy's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move CMS Energy's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of CMS Energy to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
| AI Investment Finder Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
| Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
| Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Sync Your Broker Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors. | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
| Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
| Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
| Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
| Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format |
Is CMS Energy's industry expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of CMS Energy. If investors know CMS will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about CMS Energy listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.805 | Dividend Share 1.95 | Earnings Share 3.01 | Revenue Per Share 25.625 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.14) |
The market value of CMS Energy is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of CMS that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of CMS Energy's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is CMS Energy's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because CMS Energy's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect CMS Energy's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between CMS Energy's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if CMS Energy is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, CMS Energy's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.