Louis Raspino - Chesapeake Energy Independent Director
Director
Mr. Louis A. Raspino is an Independent Director of Chesapeake Energy Corporationration since March 2013. Mr. Raspino was President and Chief Executive Officer of Pride International Inc. an international provider of contract drilling and related services to oil and natural gas companies from 2005 until the sale of the company in 2011. He was the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pride International Inc. from 2003 until 2005. Before joining Pride International in 2003 he was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Grant Prideco Inc. a manufacturer of drilling and completion products supplying the energy industry from 2001 until 2003. Previously he was Vice President of Finance for Halliburton Company Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Louisiana Land Exploration Company and began his career with Ernst Young. He was a director of DresserRand Group Inc. since 2005 and a director of Forum Energy Technologies Inc. since 2012. Mr. Raspino is a certified public accountant since 2013.
| Age | 61 |
| Tenure | 11 years |
| Professional Marks | MBA |
| Phone | 405-848-8000 |
| Web | http://www.chk.com |
Chesapeake Energy Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 4.41 % which means that it generated a profit of $4.41 on every $100 spent on assets. This is normal as compared to the sector avarege. Chesapeake Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Chesapeake Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.The company has accumulated 9.67 B in total debt. Chesapeake Energy has a current ratio of 0.42, indicating that it has a negative working capital and may not be able to pay financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Chesapeake Energy until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Chesapeake Energy's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Chesapeake Energy sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Chesapeake to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Chesapeake Energy's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.
Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Alfred Gilman | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | 72 | |
| Barry Buckland | Dyadic International | 67 | |
| Richard Rodgers | Ardelyx | 49 | |
| Frank Gerardi | Dyadic International | 62 | |
| Joseph Goldstein | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | 77 | |
| Mark Schober | Black Hills | 65 | |
| Michael Tarnok | Dyadic International | 59 | |
| Jan Lundberg | Ardelyx | 63 | |
| Huda Zoghbi | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | 63 | |
| Teresa Taylor | Black Hills | 57 | |
| Michael Madison | Black Hills | 70 | |
| Andre Klaassen | Dyadic International | N/A | |
| Geoffrey Block | Ardelyx | N/A | |
| Christine Poon | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | 65 | |
| Charles Baker | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | 84 | |
| Annalisa Jenkins | Ardelyx | 51 | |
| Robert Otto | Black Hills | 61 | |
| Anthony Coles | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | 57 | |
| Thomas Zeller | Black Hills | 70 | |
| Linda Massman | Black Hills | 50 | |
| Seth Herbst | Dyadic International | N/A | |
Management Performance
| Return On Asset | 4.41 |
Chesapeake Energy Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Chesapeake Energy's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Chesapeake Energy inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Chesapeake. The board's role is to monitor Chesapeake Energy's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Chesapeake Energy's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Chesapeake Energy's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Thomas Ryan, Independent Director | ||
| Chris Doyle, Executive Vice President - Operations, Northern Division | ||
| John Lipinski, Independent Director | ||
| Merrill Miller, Independent Director | ||
| Vincent Intrieri, Independent Director | ||
| David Hayes, Independent Director | ||
| Gloria Boyland, Director | ||
| Brad Martin, Non-Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
| Cathlyn Tompkins, Senior Vice President - Information Technology and CIO | ||
| William Buergler, Senior Vice President Chief Accounting Officer | ||
| Robert Lawler, President CEO, Director | ||
| Christopher Doyle, Executive Vice President - Operations, Northern Division | ||
| Archie Dunham, Independent Non-Executive Chairman of the Board | ||
| Frank Patterson, Executive Vice President - Exploration, Land and Subsurface Technology | ||
| Robert Martin, Chairman of the Board | ||
| Frederic Poses, Independent Director | ||
| James Webb, Executive Vice President General Counsel, Secretary | ||
| Leslie Keating, Director | ||
| Luke Corbett, Director | ||
| Mark Edmunds, Director | ||
| Michael Johnson, Senior Vice President - Accounting, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | ||
| Louis Raspino, Independent Director | ||
| Mikell Pigott, Executive Vice President - Operations, Southern Division | ||
| Kimberly Querrey, Director | ||
| Domenic DellOsso, CFO, Executive Vice President |
Chesapeake Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right pink sheet is not an easy task. Is Chesapeake Energy a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Asset | 4.41 | |||
| Profit Margin | 6.49 % | |||
| Operating Margin | 9.39 % | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 891.38 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 56.31 % | |||
| Price To Earning | 17.34 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 47.98 X | |||
| Revenue | 9.1 B | |||
| Gross Profit | 2.87 B | |||
| EBITDA | 1.98 B |
Pair Trading with Chesapeake Energy
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Chesapeake Energy position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Chesapeake Energy will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to Molson Coors could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Molson Coors when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Molson Coors - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Molson Coors Brewing to buy it.
The correlation of Molson Coors is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Molson Coors moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Molson Coors Brewing moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Molson Coors can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios. Also, note that the market value of any company could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in real. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.
Other Consideration for investing in Chesapeake Pink Sheet
If you are still planning to invest in Chesapeake Energy check if it may still be traded through OTC markets such as Pink Sheets or OTC Bulletin Board. You may also purchase it directly from the company, but this is not always possible and may require contacting the company directly. Please note that delisted stocks are often considered to be more risky investments, as they are no longer subject to the same regulatory and reporting requirements as listed stocks. Therefore, it is essential to carefully research the Chesapeake Energy's history and understand the potential risks before investing.
| Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
| Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
| Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
| Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
| USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA |