Laura Unger - Xtrackers California Independent Director
CA Etf | USD 25.23 0.02 0.08% |
Ms. Laura S. Unger is Independent Director of the Company. She was a special advisor to Promontory Financial Group, a global consulting firm for financial services companies. She served as the Independent Consultant to JPMorgan Chase Co., a global securities, investment banking and retail banking firm for the global analyst conflict settlement from 2003 to 2010. From 2002 to 2003, Ms. Unger was employed by CNBC, a satellite and cable television business news channel. Ms. Unger was a Commissioner of the SEC from 1997 to 2002, and served as Acting Chairperson of the SEC from February to August 2001. Ms. Unger served as Counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs from 1990 to 1997. Prior to working on Capitol Hill, Ms. Unger was an attorney with the Enforcement Division of the SEC. Ms. Unger has served as a director and member of the nominating and governance committee of CIT Group, Inc., a provider of financing to small businesses and middle market companies, since 2010. She also serves as a director of Childrens National Medical Center Foundation
Age | 56 |
Tenure | 20 years |
Professional Marks | MBA |
Phone | 800 225-5224 |
Web | www.ca.com |
Issuer | DWS |
Inception Date | 2023-12-14 |
Benchmark | ICE AMT-Free Broad Liquid California Municipal Index |
Entity Type | Regulated Investment Company |
Asset Under Management | 22.62 Million |
Asset Type | Fixed Income |
Category | Municipals |
Focus | Investment Grade |
Market Concentration | Developed Markets |
Region | North America |
Xtrackers California Management Efficiency
Xtrackers California's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Xtrackers California manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Similar Fund Executives
Found 13 records | One Year Return | ||
William Gates | Microsoft | 62 | |
Teri ListStoll | Microsoft | 55 | |
Sandra Peterson | Microsoft | 59 | |
Charles Noski | Microsoft | 65 | |
Arne Sorenson | Microsoft | 59 | |
John Stanton | Microsoft | 62 | |
Hugh Johnston | Microsoft | 56 | |
Penny Pritzker | Microsoft | 57 | |
Mason Morfit | Microsoft | 40 | |
Padmasree Warrior | Microsoft | 57 | |
Charles Scharf | Microsoft | 52 | |
Helmut Panke | Microsoft | 71 | |
Reid Hoffman | Microsoft | 50 |
Management Performance
Return On Equity | 0.0014 | |||
Return On Asset | 6.0E-4 |
Xtrackers California Money Managers
Gerard Lavinay, Member of the Executive Committee, Executive Director Italy | ||
Philippe Houze, Lead Director | ||
Anthony Radesca, Principal Accounting Officer | ||
Jaime Ysmael, Chairman of the Board and Presidentident | ||
Jacob Lamm, Executive Vice President - Strategy and Corporate Development | ||
Jeffrey Katz, Director | ||
Ayman Sayed, Executive Vice President Chief Product Officer | ||
Eric Uzan, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Southern Europe (Spain and Italy) | ||
Noel Prioux, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Latin America (Brazil and Argentina) | ||
Asuncion Padilla, Director | ||
Jeffrey Lim, Director | ||
Michael Bauer, IR Contact Officer | ||
Traci Tsuchiguchi, Vice President - Investor Relations | ||
Thierry Garnier, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Asia (China and Taiwan) | ||
Adam Elster, Executive VP and Group Executive of Worldwide Sales and Services | ||
Thierry Faraut, Director Representing Employees | ||
Richard Beckert, CFO and Executive VP | ||
Patricia Lemoine, Director | ||
Paul Pronsati, Executive Vice President - Global Operations and Information Technology | ||
Jose Evangelista, Corporate Secretary, Compliance Officer | ||
Marie Cheval, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Customers, Services and Digital Transformation | ||
Raymond Bromark, Independent Director | ||
Mathilde Lemoine, Independent Director | ||
Francois Polignac, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Merchandise, Supply and Formats | ||
Pascal Clouzard, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director France | ||
Samson Lazo, Independent Director | ||
Thierry Breton, Independent Director | ||
Guillaume Colonges, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Northern and Eastern Europe (Belgium, Poland and Romania) | ||
Matthieu Malige, Member of the Group Executive Committee, CFO | ||
Rami Baitieh, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Spain | ||
Rohit Kapoor, Independent Director | ||
Jerome Nanty, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Human Resources for the Group and France | ||
Alexandre Arnault, Director | ||
Laurent Vallee, Member of the Group Executive Committee, General Secretary | ||
MarieLaure Chalon, Independent Director | ||
Laura Unger, Independent Director | ||
Amelie OudeaCastera, Independent Director | ||
Richard Sulpizio, Independent Director | ||
Aurore Domont, Independent Director | ||
Flavia Almeida, Director | ||
Nicolas Bazire, Director | ||
Lauren Flaherty, Chief Marketing Officer and Executive VP | ||
Otto Berkes, CTO | ||
Claudia Silva, Independent Director | ||
Rich Sulpizio, Independent Director | ||
Kay Koplovitz, Independent Director | ||
Stephane Israel, Independent Director | ||
Frederic Haffner, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Strategy and M&A | ||
Christopher Lofgren, Independent Director | ||
Ceasar Buenaventura, Head of Finance | ||
Martine SaintCricq, Director Representing Employees | ||
Michael Gregoire, CEO, Global Pres and Director | ||
Jose Sio, Director | ||
Michael Bisignano, Executive Vice President General Counsel | ||
Ronilo Quiat, Assistant Vice President Head - Special Projects | ||
Bernard Arnault, Director | ||
Abilio Diniz, Director | ||
Laurent Glepin, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Communication for the Group and France | ||
Davee Zuniga, CFO, Treasurer | ||
Jose Jalandoni, Director | ||
JeanLaurent Bonnafe, Director | ||
Stephane Courbit, Independent Director | ||
Lan Yan, Independent Director | ||
Arthur Weinbach, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
Neil Manna, | ||
Jean Hobby, Independent Director | ||
Dominique BenneteauWood, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Communication for the Group and France | ||
Isagani Elacio, Assistant Corporate Secretary | ||
Jens Alder, Independent Director | ||
Jacques Ehrmann, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Assets, International Development and Innovation | ||
Renato Zambonini, Independent Director | ||
Michael Abundo, General Manager | ||
Stephane Maquaire, Member of the Group Executive Committee, Executive Director, Argentina | ||
Gary Fernandes, Independent Director | ||
Kieran McGrath, Interim CFO, Senior Vice President | ||
Alexandre Bompard, Chairman of the Board, CEO, Chairman of the Executive Committee | ||
Charles Edelstenne, Independent Director |
Xtrackers Etf Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right etf is not an easy task. Is Xtrackers California a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Return On Equity | 0.0014 | |||
Return On Asset | 6.0E-4 | |||
Profit Margin | 0 % | |||
Operating Margin | 30.23 % | |||
Current Valuation | 17.94 B | |||
Shares Outstanding | 418.17 M | |||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 25.01 % | |||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 71.66 % | |||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 27.42 M | |||
Price To Earning | 40.11 X |
Pair Trading with Xtrackers California
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Xtrackers California position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Xtrackers California will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to Xtrackers California could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Xtrackers California when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Xtrackers California - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Xtrackers California Municipal to buy it.
The correlation of Xtrackers California is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Xtrackers California moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Xtrackers California moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Xtrackers California can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Trending Equities to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Xtrackers California Municipal. Also, note that the market value of any etf could be tightly coupled with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in nation. Note that the Xtrackers California information on this page should be used as a complementary analysis to other Xtrackers California's statistical models used to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.
Complementary Tools for Xtrackers Etf analysis
When running Xtrackers California's price analysis, check to measure Xtrackers California's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Xtrackers California is operating at the current time. Most of Xtrackers California's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Xtrackers California's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Xtrackers California's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Xtrackers California to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites |
The market value of Xtrackers California is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Xtrackers that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Xtrackers California's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Xtrackers California's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Xtrackers California's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Xtrackers California's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Xtrackers California's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Xtrackers California is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Xtrackers California's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.